Hi David,
Well, that's because this is the "dev@pivot.apache.org" list.
You unsubscribed from the "u...@pivot.apache.org" list....
~Roger Whitcomb
-----Original Message-----
From: David Ray [mailto:david....@barchart.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 12:38 PM
To: dev@pivot.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 2.0.3 - Round 4
I received your email today after receiving a "Goodbye" message from the
server on the 7/18/2003
I didn't realize I was that "liked" around here that the server refuses
to let me go? :)
Anyway, thought I'd let you know that "ezmlm" has attained consciousness
and is taking over...
David
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the u...@pivot.apache.org
mailing list.
Acknowledgment: I have removed the address
david....@barchart.com
from the user mailing list. This address is no longer a subscriber.
On Jul 23, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Roger L. Whitcomb
<roger.whitc...@actian.com> wrote:
> Based on two previous rounds of testing (and verifying that the
> artifacts haven't changed):
>
> First set of tests done (on 2013-04-07):
> - Verified the text RAT reports
> - Compared SVN tags/2.0.3 with current branches/2.0.x contents.
> - Downloaded .tar.gz and .zip files and verified MD5 and SHA-1
> checksums
> - Untar the sources and compare to current SVN "branches/2.0.x"
> - Build (using "ant") the sources to verify no errors (using Java
> 1.6.0_43 on OSX)
> - Check the generated Javadoc (selected pages)
> - Check the Javadoc generated from source vs. Javadoc packaged in the
> binary distribution:
> * Some non-date differences noted in the following files:
> - index-all.html
> - package-tree.html
> - class-use/Dictionary.html
> - class-use/Group.html
> - class-use/List.ItemIterator.html
> - and some others
> * I'm going to discount these as due to slightly different JDK
> versions used
> - Verify the correct version number in the README file
> - Quick verify of the fixed bugs in RELEASE-NOTES
> - Untar the binary distribution, unjar the files and verify selected
> files same as the source .class build
> - Plug the binary distribution files into our application and verified
> correct operation of a number of things
>
> Second set of tests done (on 2013-06-03):
> * System is OSX 10.6.8, JDK 1.6.0_45 (x86_64)
> * Download all .zip and .tar.gz files, check MD5 checksums.
> * Compare contents of .zip files with contents of .tar.gz files and
> verified they are identical.
> * Run "clean", "package", "doc", "test" targets on both source
> directories.
> * Tested .jar files built from source with our application.
> * Tested binary .jar files with our application.
> * Browsed Javadoc in all four locations (generated from source
> directories and from shipped binary files).
> * Browsed text RAT reports.
> * Compared 2.0.3 tag with current branches/2.0.x code and found only
> expected differences.
> * Compare both source downloads with contents of tags/2.0.3 and
> verified they are identical.
>
> So my vote is:
> [ X ] +1 Publish
>
> ~Roger Whitcomb
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandro Martini [mailto:sandro.mart...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 8:49 AM
> To: dev@pivot.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pivot 2.0.3 - Round 4
>
> Hi All,
>
> the Pivot 2.0.3 release candidate has been tagged, packaged, and is
> ready for a vote.
> The artifacts, RAT reports, and KEYS file can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~smartini/pivot-2.0.3_release/
>
> Note that just for convenience there are even Maven bundles for
> installing them in a real Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~smartini/pivot-2.0.3_maven/
>
>
> The tag from which the release artifacts were generated can be found
> here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pivot/tags/2.0.3/
>
> In addition, my PGP public code signing key can be found at the MIT
> key server (http://pgp.mit.edu/), but just for convenience that key is
> even
> here:
> http://people.apache.org/~smartini/F9EDAF10.asc , and
> smartini_apache.asc is only a copy of it with a better name.
>
> Please vote to publish this release by Wednesday , July 31 at 23:00
GMT.
> Note that voting may conclude early if people have the time to look
> earlier (but in any case, minimum 72 hours).
>
> Remember that the Apache Voting Process requires a minimum of 3
> Bindings
> +1 vote for the release to be successful (see the "Votes on Package
> Release"
> paragraph).
>
> In your vote, please include the testing you performed to arrive at
> your vote.
>
> [ ] +1 Publish
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 Don't publish
>
> Thanks,
> Sandro
