ahh… but there's still hope for esmlm yet isn't there? :)
David On Jul 23, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Roger L. Whitcomb <roger.whitc...@actian.com> wrote: > Hi David, > Well, that's because this is the "dev@pivot.apache.org" list. > You unsubscribed from the "u...@pivot.apache.org" list.... > > ~Roger Whitcomb > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Ray [mailto:david....@barchart.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 12:38 PM > To: dev@pivot.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 2.0.3 - Round 4 > > I received your email today after receiving a "Goodbye" message from the > server on the 7/18/2003 > > I didn't realize I was that "liked" around here that the server refuses > to let me go? :) > > Anyway, thought I'd let you know that "ezmlm" has attained consciousness > and is taking over... > > David > > > Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the u...@pivot.apache.org > mailing list. > > Acknowledgment: I have removed the address > > david....@barchart.com > > from the user mailing list. This address is no longer a subscriber. > > > > On Jul 23, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Roger L. Whitcomb > <roger.whitc...@actian.com> wrote: > >> Based on two previous rounds of testing (and verifying that the >> artifacts haven't changed): >> >> First set of tests done (on 2013-04-07): >> - Verified the text RAT reports >> - Compared SVN tags/2.0.3 with current branches/2.0.x contents. >> - Downloaded .tar.gz and .zip files and verified MD5 and SHA-1 >> checksums >> - Untar the sources and compare to current SVN "branches/2.0.x" >> - Build (using "ant") the sources to verify no errors (using Java >> 1.6.0_43 on OSX) >> - Check the generated Javadoc (selected pages) >> - Check the Javadoc generated from source vs. Javadoc packaged in the >> binary distribution: >> * Some non-date differences noted in the following files: >> - index-all.html >> - package-tree.html >> - class-use/Dictionary.html >> - class-use/Group.html >> - class-use/List.ItemIterator.html >> - and some others >> * I'm going to discount these as due to slightly different JDK >> versions used >> - Verify the correct version number in the README file >> - Quick verify of the fixed bugs in RELEASE-NOTES >> - Untar the binary distribution, unjar the files and verify selected >> files same as the source .class build >> - Plug the binary distribution files into our application and verified > >> correct operation of a number of things >> >> Second set of tests done (on 2013-06-03): >> * System is OSX 10.6.8, JDK 1.6.0_45 (x86_64) >> * Download all .zip and .tar.gz files, check MD5 checksums. >> * Compare contents of .zip files with contents of .tar.gz files and >> verified they are identical. >> * Run "clean", "package", "doc", "test" targets on both source >> directories. >> * Tested .jar files built from source with our application. >> * Tested binary .jar files with our application. >> * Browsed Javadoc in all four locations (generated from source >> directories and from shipped binary files). >> * Browsed text RAT reports. >> * Compared 2.0.3 tag with current branches/2.0.x code and found only >> expected differences. >> * Compare both source downloads with contents of tags/2.0.3 and >> verified they are identical. >> >> So my vote is: >> [ X ] +1 Publish >> >> ~Roger Whitcomb >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sandro Martini [mailto:sandro.mart...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 8:49 AM >> To: dev@pivot.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pivot 2.0.3 - Round 4 >> >> Hi All, >> >> the Pivot 2.0.3 release candidate has been tagged, packaged, and is >> ready for a vote. >> The artifacts, RAT reports, and KEYS file can be found here: >> http://people.apache.org/~smartini/pivot-2.0.3_release/ >> >> Note that just for convenience there are even Maven bundles for >> installing them in a real Maven Repository: >> http://people.apache.org/~smartini/pivot-2.0.3_maven/ >> >> >> The tag from which the release artifacts were generated can be found >> here: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pivot/tags/2.0.3/ >> >> In addition, my PGP public code signing key can be found at the MIT >> key server (http://pgp.mit.edu/), but just for convenience that key is > >> even >> here: >> http://people.apache.org/~smartini/F9EDAF10.asc , and >> smartini_apache.asc is only a copy of it with a better name. >> >> Please vote to publish this release by Wednesday , July 31 at 23:00 > GMT. >> Note that voting may conclude early if people have the time to look >> earlier (but in any case, minimum 72 hours). >> >> Remember that the Apache Voting Process requires a minimum of 3 >> Bindings >> +1 vote for the release to be successful (see the "Votes on Package >> Release" >> paragraph). >> >> In your vote, please include the testing you performed to arrive at >> your vote. >> >> [ ] +1 Publish >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -0 >> [ ] -1 Don't publish >> >> Thanks, >> Sandro >
