Don't worry, no problem :-) . Bye
2014-11-02 16:28 GMT+01:00 Roger Whitcomb <rogerandb...@rbwhitcomb.com>: > Yeah I thought about that right after I fired off my earlier response. So > that's fine to merge the change to 2.0.x branch (or I can do it easily also). > > Thanks, > ~Roger > >> On Nov 2, 2014, at 3:47 AM, Sandro Martini <sandro.mart...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> but usually now we run 2.0.x applets/applications with Java 7 updated jre, >> so I don't think it's so bad. >> Unless objections I'll do the merge and create a related issue, to track it. >> >> Bye >> Il 01/nov/2014 01:43 "Roger Whitcomb" <rogerandb...@rbwhitcomb.com> ha >> scritto: >> >>> I don't think it is necessary for 2.0.x because we don't build there with >>> 1.7 by default, but in trunk we do. >>> >>> ~Roger Whitcomb >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 1:42 AM, Sandro Martini <sandro.mart...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ciao Roger, >>>> just see the commit for the change in build files in trunk ... what do >>>> you think on a merge even to 2.0.x ? >>>> If it's ok I can do it, tell me ... and add an issue for this (2.1.0 and >>> 2.0.5). >>>> >>>> Bye >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-10-29 13:14 GMT+01:00 Sandro Martini <sandro.mart...@gmail.com>: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>>> We've now started to deploy our app as an applet using Pivot, and to >>> address the new security considerations in Java 7, we needed to set the >>> "Permissions" attribute in "pivot-wtk.jar" to "all-permissions". I did >>> this by manually modifying the "build.xml" in "trunk". Doesn't seem like a >>> good solution going forward. So, anyone have a thought as to how best to >>> resolve this? >>>>>> Should this be in "build.properties"? >>>>> yes >>>>>> Should it be set to "all-permissions" always? Should it be set to >>> "sandbox" instead? Should it be up to users (i.e., they would have to >>> build the code themselves in order to set this)? >>>>> I'd set it to "all-permissions" directly in build.properties file >>>>> (maybe with a commented line on possible values), so anyone that needs >>>>> a different value can change it and rebuild. >>>>> >>>>>> Anyone know how others are addressing this in their applet code? >>>>> no, sorry ... maybe forward this mail even to users could help us to >>>>> get a better idea. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Note that in our Web Start demo files in the web site, we set the >>>>> security tag to all-permissions (inside jnlp files) to make those >>>>> requiring additional permissions work. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, these are related issues (our and at Infra) to track this: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-920 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3991 >>>>> >>>>> and we should start soon to take a look (once we receive signing info) >>>>> ... Roger could you ask to enable us ? >>>>> >>>>> Note that if possible we could make the same even for 2.0.x ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As a side note, on Applets and Java 8, did you tried (I fear that some >>>>> classes that we refer are are no more usable, it's already in todo >>>>> list in a related issue) ? >>>>> >>>>> Bye, >>>>> Sandro >>>
