On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is still an issue we need to resolve. Microsoft signing the CLA-C, > appropriately clarifying the OSP, or developing a standard for judging > "conformance" (which should extend to running POI on devices where it is not > possible to fully "conform") would satisfy me. > > I'm not trying to be intractable here, but POI needs to stay open source. > I'm still -1 until the issue is resolved. I'm comfortable reverting it > (given GR's statement w/regards to copyright) once this issue is > appropriately resolved.
Given that POI is CURRENTLY open source, how EXACTLY does a document which grants us (a possibly empty set of) ADDITIONAL rights make it any less so? - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
