On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:53 PM, David Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
>  On Apr 22, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> > While I, too, can't speak FOR Microsoft, I am quite willing to speak
> > WITH Microsoft.  Particularly if the request was modestly scoped, and
> > if doing so would sort the issue right from the start.
>
>  It looks like someone from Microsoft has shown up to discuss our issues
> with the OSP, patent grants, etc. Should we respond with a clear list as
> distilled from this very long and often emotional discussion, or should we
> wait until they come back with answers.
>
>  I think that it would help us to have a list of statements. Its clear to me
> that you might be the best person to make that list.
>
>  I propose a vote of consensus - Do we (A) present a list of questions as a
> reply to Sam Ramji's posting "ApachePOI Email", or (B) wait for Microsoft's
> answers as Sam Ramji promises?
>
>  If (A) becomes our choice, then I think we should reach a consensus about
> the list, one that is rather inclusive. I certainly think we should make
> sure to ask all of Andy's questions. I also am not sure that his are all the
> questions that need to be asked.
>
>  I am (A) +1. and (B) 0.

I find it mildly disconcerting that this email is posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and yet refers to Sam Ramji in the third person.  I'd suggest that a
reasonable precursor to either questions or answers would be a dialog.

My hope is that longer term that the dialog continues.  Sam has
indicated (on this very list -- hi Sam!) that his personal goal is to
make the specification easy to adopt by open source projects.  Well,
I've never met a spec that I didn't have questions on.  If this
mailing list could become the place where developers and spec authors
were to discuss any questions of interpretation that may arise: that
would, in my opinion, be a good outcome.

- Sam Ruby

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to