OK, current status: * I'll take a look at the patch on TIKA-2058, if it's low-risk it can go in * I could do with input from those who use HSLF about whether to hold up another RC for the issue below.
I may not have time to roll RC3 tonight; if not I'll do it tomorrow night which gives us all the weekend to try it out. Thanks, David On 14/09/16 21:39, Javen O'Neal wrote: > The HSLF footer text regression is still open. > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2013 > > On Sep 14, 2016 12:43 PM, "Dominik Stadler" <dominik.stad...@gmx.at> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd also rather keep it as is to not break it multiple times. >> >> Dominik. >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Javen O'Neal <javenon...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> CellValue#getCellType was changed to return an enum after the 3.14 >> release. >>> I reverted that signature change in r1760607 (see bug 59791 comment 13). >>> >>> For bug 59907, I broke backwards compatibility for ClientAnchor (both >> HSSF >>> and XSSF) in r1716313 (first appeared in POI 3.14 beta 1 and included in >>> POI 3.14 final) without the usual 2 release deprecation warning. The >>> question is do I restore the behavior of 3.13 (breaking code a second >> time >>> for anyone who upgraded their code to 3.14, and a third time whenever we >>> retire the int code), or do we leave it as is and ask users to upgrade to >>> the enum getter now? >>> >>> Looking at the code example from bug 59907 comment 1, the fix for them is >>> simple: delete ".getValue()". >>> >>> On Sep 13, 2016 09:06, "Javen O'Neal" <javenon...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I will commit a fix for this today with the goal for backwards >>>> compatibility. >>>> >>>> Here's the plan: >>>> getX() returns int >>>> getXEnum() returns enum >>>> setX(int) >>>> setX(enum) >>>> >>>> I will also take a look at bug 59907 (client anchor enum) >>>> >>>> On Sep 13, 2016 6:58 AM, "David North" <dtn-...@corefiling.co.uk> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Javen, any thoughts on this one? >>>>> >>>>> On 13/09/16 12:14, Dominik Stadler wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I really hate to delay this further, but unfortunately we have a >>> similar >>>>>> problem in class CellValue as we tried to fix in Cell in RC2, the >>>>>> getCellType() is now an enum whereas it was an int before, so >>> something >>>>>> like the following in user-code does break in POI 3.15: >>>>>> >>>>>> CellValue cellValue = checkAndGetCellValue(evaluator, sheet, line); >>>>>> >>>>>> switch (cellValue.getCellType()) { >>>>>> case Cell.CELL_TYPE_STRING: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am sorry that I did not see this earlier but this can lead to the >>> same >>>>>> incompatibility as we had in Cell before. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dominik. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:46 PM, David North <dno...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My apologies for going AWOL in the middle of the last release >>> attempt. >>>>> I >>>>>>> didn't anticipate that we'd find problems in review twice in a row, >>> and >>>>>>> things have been very busy for me at work lately. However, I've now >>>>>>> rolled a second RC for 3.15. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC2/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Areas to review: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Does it work? >>>>>>> * Are the sigs and hashes valid? >>>>>>> * Have the issues with the last RC been fixed? >>>>>>> * Are the release notes now in good shape? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The vote starts now and ends at 20:55 BST on Tuesday 13 September >>> 2016. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is my +1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> After this release is done, I'll try and find some time to profile >>> the >>>>>>> build & tests - 15 minutes is quite a wait on an SSD (it's possible >>> we >>>>>>> might want some multi-threaded options on the tests). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> David North | www.dnorth.net >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
