+1 We should keep the behavior of the Admin API consistent with the Pulsar Client.
> I think we should think about why we can not add a new schema of BYTES. > The users use the byte schema to send or consume messages. But the schema > registry has never stored the BYTES schema and we always need some special > compatibility checks for the BYTES schema. > I mean it is strange for users and difficult to maintain for developers. We don't need to put the BYTES schema in the schema registry. A topic without schema represents the topic with BYTES schema. Thanks, Penghui On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 2:37 PM Xiangying Meng <xiangy...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, Donglai: > Thanks for your discussion. > I think we should think about why we can not add a new schema of BYTES. > The users use the byte schema to send or consume messages. But the schema > registry has never stored the BYTES schema and we always need some special > compatibility checks for the BYTES schema. > I mean it is strange for users and difficult to maintain for developers. > Thanks, > Xiangying >
