Hi yufan. Can you describe a bit the usage scenario of byte schema in flink-connector-pulsa?
Thanks, sinan Yufan Sheng <syh...@gmail.com> 于 2023年3月28日周二 上午9:53写道： > As the flink-connector-pulsar developer, I don't want to disable the > BYTES schema upload. In my opinion, using BYTES schema means the users > want to bypass the schema check and handle the schema validation by > themselves. > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 8:58 AM SiNan Liu <liusinan1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, everyone. > > When a user uploads bytes schema. We can warn the user and skip uploading > > bytes schema. > > Also check to see if the topic has a schema other than bytes. > > 1. If yes, warn the user that it is not necessary to upload bytes schema. > > You can subscribe to a topic using bytes schema. > > 2. If there is no schema, warn the user that the topic does not have a > > schema. The default is bytes schema, and there is no need to upload it. > > Rather than simply throwing an exception rejecting the upload bytes > schema. > > > > > > Thanks, > > sinan > > > > > > Christophe Bornet <bornet.ch...@gmail.com> 于 2023年3月28日周二 上午1:15写道： > > > > > This change broke the Flink SQL Pulsar connector: > > > https://github.com/streamnative/flink/issues/270 > > > So I propose to revert it. > > > > > > Le ven. 9 déc. 2022 à 11:57, labuladong <labulad...@foxmail.com> a > écrit : > > > > > > > > Hi pulsar community, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to discuss the behavior of schema uploading, for more > context > > > see https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18825 > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that forbidding users to upload `BYTES` schema is a > recommended > > > way to solve this issue. But this may change the existing behavior, so > do > > > you have any suggestion about this issue? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Donglai > > > >
