Hi Asaf

There is a link to introduce the dynamic configuration.
https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/2.10.x/admin-api-brokers/#dynamic-broker-configuration

Best,
Mattison
On Feb 14, 2023, 17:06 +0800, Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 3:46 AM <mattisonc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Asaf
> >
> > Welcome to join this discussion.
> > > > You mean that allows the *system* to use it when it's a partitioned
> > topic?
> > Sorry, I didn't get your point. What do you mean by *system*?
> >
>
> This sentence was a reply to:
>
> 2. Make the `-partition-` string the keyword. That allows the user to use
> > it when it's a partitioned topic.
> >
>
> I wanted to say that this sentence should be:
> Make the `-partition-` string the keyword, that allows the *system* to use
> it when it's a partitioned topic.
>
>
>
> > > > Why postfix of `__`?Why uppercase ?Maybe `__system__<name>`?
> > Yes, That is a key point that I want to discuss in this
> > thread. `__system__<name>` is good for me.
> > > > Can you please elaborate what it means to make it dynamic exactly?
> > Sorry, I will refine it. it means we can update this configuration
> > dynamically. (using rest api or sth)
> >
>
> I'm unfamiliar with how Pulsar supports dynamic configuration. I would
> love it if you can share a link or explain it briefly, thus explaining what
> exactly you are going to change to support dynamic configuration.
>
> > General question: In the last thread you said something about
> > configurablerules, etc? You decided not to use this idea?
> > IMO, That idea is an advanced feature. we may need more time to discuss
> > the details and for the topic name restriction, maybe we don't have strong
> > reason to use that.
> >
> > We can introduce this advanced feature when we have a need for it.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
>
> I agree. Future PIP and discussion.
>
>
> >
> > Best,
> > Mattison
> > On Feb 13, 2023, 22:21 +0800, Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > > > You mean that allows the *system* to use it when it's a partitioned
> > topic?
> >

Reply via email to