Hello, I wish and recommend to handle it in the best way which is possible at each task.
Let us try to find the best way. All tries with the alias are better than the way in the past. Let's start working on it Kind regards Mechtilde Am 22.05.2010 02:41, schrieb Peter Junge: > Thorsten Behrens wrote: >> Peter Junge wrote: >>> Kendy has been suggesting to assign distro specific issues to an >>> appropriate alias while Thorsten prefers to see these issues closed, >>> which seems reasonable. IMHO both approaches can be combined, by >>> flagging such issue indeed as 'Invalid/Closed', but reassigning it >>> to a distro-specific alias at the same time. As a result Thorstens >>> statistic will be clean, no black hole, while the distro maintainer >>> has a single point of access to the issues that might be interesting >>> for him. >> I'm not sure I like this proposal, especially in the light of how a >> reporter feels, who has his or her issue closed as invalid - if this >> is only about statistics, surely those can be amended to list distro >> bugs separately? > > Hi Thorsten, > this is a good point and of course an issue, but I think we have to find > a solution that is feasible and practicable four everyone. It should be > best practice anyway that such actions will be explained, just with a > boilerplate like: "This issue is only reproducible with <distro X.Y>, > hence it should be followed by <distro> QA." The ideal case would be to > also add a link pointing to the issue ID in the tracking system where it > is handled. > > Best regards, > Peter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Dipl. Ing. Mechtilde Stehmann ## http://de.openoffice.org ## Ansprechpartnerin für die deutschsprachige QA ## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows, Solaris ## Meine Seite http://www.mechtilde.de ## PGP encryption welcome! Key-ID: 0x53B3892B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
