Thorsten, Jan, > > >>> Do you think it might work for you, please? > >> If a process of handling such issues (I wrote about it some mails > >> ago) exists and the alias aren't a black hole where nothing > >> happen, than it might work. But it still costs resources in the > >> mother-project OOo. And this I want to avoid. > > > > No, it is not going to be a black hole. I just hope my proposal is > > the least work for you, with potential benefits for all of us. > > You will get more than 100 issues per month on the alias. If you do > not have a QA team for evaluating this issues adequately the alias > will be a black hole. From my experience with doing QA and organize > QA processes for a very long time I can tell you, the alias will be a > black hole very quickly.
May I propose something? If we try to stay pragmatical, here's what we have today: - an alias Kendy set up. - a discussion on whether the potential usage of this alias will generate a black hole :-) So how about we see what the alias will "catch" for a month and continue this discussion on these first metrics in one month? Thanks, Charles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
