Curiosity: Anyone know the license on the javax.servlet.jar that is in the java stuff? The MANIFEST notes its built by JBOSS so it's not the Sun CDDL one or the Geronimo specs Apache licensed one. I'd personally suggest flipping to the geronimo-specs version.
Also bin/qpidd doesn't have the apache header or the various qpid?.conf files. The Jython license seems to be missing from the LICENSE/NOTICE files. Bunch of files don't have apache headers such as the 010ExcludeList, *.testprofile, Bunch of stuff in dotnet also are missing headers. (default.build, App.config, build-*, etc...) Bunch of stuff in examples/**/verify-*. gentool/* Another curiosity question: should the java distro really have all the test jars? Not a big deal, but slightly unusual. Not a blocker. Just curious. In general, for something being voted on, this isn't in very good shape. The headers/licenses really need to be checked by the release managers. Dan On Thursday 11 December 2008 11:17:48 pm Rafael Schloming wrote: > M4 RC3 can be found here: > > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-M4-RC3/ > > I don't know of any outstanding blockers, so I think we're ready for a > vote. > > FYI I'm on holiday starting tomorrow through next week, so RC4 if needed > won't be till the 22nd, however the release build is fairly well > scripted now, so if anyone is impatient an RC4 can be produced by > choosing an svn revision and running the release script in trunk/qpid/bin: > > release.sh <svn-revision> M4 > > This will automatically export the specified revision into the current > directory, do a full release build, and place the results in the > artifacts directory. > > Here's my vote: > > +1 for releasing RC3 as M4 > > --Rafael -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog
