Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote:
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Also bin/qpidd doesn't have the apache header or the various qpid?.conf
files.
I've added the license to the conf files and the qpidd init script and a
.cpp that was missing it. Also fixed a minor typo in the license included
for the management schema generators python scripts.
We shoud really integrate RAT into our release process.
Are there defined rules for what must, should, may etc have the license
included? Rat seems not to require it for READMEs or generated files? (I
tried running it for the first time today, so not sure if that
assumption is entirely correct.
The generated c++ API docs don't contain the license, but the source
they are generated from does. Should they have the license in them? What
about the Makefile.am files (i.e the inputs to automake) which currently
don't have them either?
