2009/1/20 Aidan Skinner <[email protected]>:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jonathan Robie
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Lahiru Gunathilake wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>> Yeah, we did that explicitly to get some more Google hits :-)
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> And it also helps anyone who happens to get a mail from our list or find it
>> on the Internet, and wants to know where to go for more.
>
> -1
>
> It's really ugly and the list info is already in the message headers.
>
> - Aidan
>
> --
> Apache Qpid - World Domination through Advanced Message Queueing
> http://qpid.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
>
>

Whilst I'm not totally against a footer per say the enabling of the
footer without a vote or much discussion on the content is what is
most against the Apache way in my view.

If the point of the change is to game Google then I would be very
surprised if Google actually farmed mailing lists sites for urls.
Sending few 100,000 emails to a list to gain page rank sounds like
something Google would have already caught on to.

If we are to have a footer I would at least suggest the following two
links on both lists. The number of people that ask how to unsubscribe
is > 0 so having the details in the email would be most useful.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <list>[email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: <list>[email protected]

As for having the project name and url my quick look through the
mailing lists I'm subscribed to go both ways (for those that have
footers).

For me it really a burning issue more a waste of my Gmail storage as
Gmail will automatically hide the footer.

Regards

Martin

-- 
Martin Ritchie

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to