Robert Godfrey wrote:
2009/2/10 Aidan Skinner <[email protected]>:
(moving this to another thread so as to make tallying the vote easier)
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Robert Greig <[email protected]> wrote:
2009/2/9 Robert Godfrey <[email protected]>:
I'd rather stay on M5 and work towards a release which can be > 1.0
I think it would be good to have a discussion - hopefully leading to
consensus (!) - on what people think we need to have achieved to merit
a 1.x release. To my mind, if people agree those items and they are
different from what is in scope in our next release, that implies we
don't have the correct focus for our next release(s).
I think that's a separate issue. We do need to talk about our release
process a bit more, but that's probably best done in another thread.
Possibly this one: http://markmail.org/message/5bxobdc23rgbmqu7
I think we need to have a rationale for changing the release numbering
scheme at *this* release.
Given the lack of interoperability between components if I were only
given the choice of 0.5 and 1.5 then I would have to pick 0.5 right
now. I really don't want to do that as I think 0.5 significantly
understates the maturity of the product.
However given we are currently scheduling the work to bring the Java
Broker up to 0-10 support I would rather hold off changing the
numbering scheme until that work has been done. At that point I would
think we could move to a version numbering scheme with a major version
If we could agree to get 0-10 into the Java Broker in a timely fashion
and then change then
go to 1.0, I am fine with that. However, the 'M' is a pain and if we
don't reach that point for
the next release I would prefer to go to 0.5 for the next release.
Carl
