> Aidan Skinner wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Carl Trieloff > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> If we could agree to get 0-10 into the Java Broker in a > timely fashion and > >> then change then > >> go to 1.0, I am fine with that. However, the 'M' is a pain > and if we don't > >> reach that point for > >> the next release I would prefer to go to 0.5 for the next release. > > > > I don't think that adding 0-10 support to the Java broker > is the only > > step necessary before we declare ourselves 1.0. I'm not sure that > > there's a consensus around what would be Qpid 1.0 just now. > > What else do you feel is necessary?
I think the API consistency/ease-of-use is more of an issue than the protocol compatibility. > For me it's all about interop across > the different languages, and the biggest part of that is 0-10 > support in the Java broker. Ok. > I'd also like to see some progress on protocol neutral > APIs in other languages, but I actually think thats an area > where we can whip things into shape with relatively little work. I think that protocol-neutral API is going to end up a larger effort than protocol implementation/interop. It ripples very far. It's also what most newcomers will be affected most by as they start to look at how to use Qpid for projects. -Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
