Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Carl Trieloff <[email protected]> wrote:
If we could agree to get 0-10 into the Java Broker in a timely fashion and
then change then
go to 1.0, I am fine with that. However, the 'M' is a pain and if we don't
reach that point for
the next release I would prefer to go to 0.5 for the next release.
I don't think that adding 0-10 support to the Java broker is the only
step necessary before we declare ourselves 1.0. I'm not sure that
there's a consensus around what would be Qpid 1.0 just now.
I don't care when we decide to call it 1.0, but a would like to get rid
of the 'M'
Carl.
