Gordon Sim wrote:
For me the first part of the process is a protocol independent API and some thinking around how to support multiple protocols in the broker (allowing messages published over one protocol to be delivered over another etc).
You mean an internal support API into which the 1.0 and 0.10 bits etc can be plugged?

Another important aspect is ensuring that adding support for 1.0 doesn't break previously supported versions.
How important is that, really? There is no version overlap in the Java and C++ brokers currently. You aren't at v1.0 yet, of AMQP or QPid.

Is anyone actually in production?

Thank you very much for investing your time in the project, it is great to have your interest!
You could read to much into it. I'm trying to warn that my interest isn't realistically going to result in coding. I can think about things, comment, and play. But I can't contribute in a 'show me the code' way. Some projects can't accomodate that. I can see why there is a preference for action rather than bike-shed design, but it does limit the sort of contribution that people can make - after all, even a prioritisation of features from potential users is a contribution at some level.

James


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to