We do have two serious regressions in QPID-3214 & QPID-3216

But I don't think we should stop the release as I don't believe we can
fix them quickly and safely enough to make this release viable.
We are trying very hard to release often and I don't want to jeopardize that.
Since we do have another release coming in another 2 months, there is
no point delaying this release any further.

Therefore IMO we should "release-note" these issues and go ahead.
Another option is to do an errata just for the java client (or any
other component with a similar problem) as soon as we are confident
about the fixes.

Regards,

Rajith

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Robbie Gemmell
<[email protected]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Robbie
>
> On 14 April 2011 15:39, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello, everyone.  The blocker issue raised earlier this week has been
>> resolved.  There's more information, including release notes, at the release
>> page[1].
>>
>> The proposed final distribution of Qpid 0.10 is available from the link
>> below.  It's from revision 1091571 of the 0.10 branch.
>>
>>  http://people.apache.org/~astitcher/dist/qpid-0.10/
>>
>> Andrew has graciously generated and signed this distro.  It therefore meets
>> the requirements for a vote.
>>
>> If you favor releasing this distribution as Qpid 0.10, vote +1.
>>
>> If you are aware of problems that ought to prevent this distribution from
>> being released, vote -1.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>> ---
>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/0.10+Release
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
>> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
>> Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to