That seems reasonable to me, Marnie.

-Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marnie McCormack [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 5:37 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 0.10
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> I've had a look at the details and I'd like to propose the 
> release go ahead now, rather than be delayed any further.
> 
> The reasoning is that the Java items highlighted are not 
> strictly regressions (existing largely in Qpid 0.8) and more 
> importantly the fixes for them, and associated issues, are 
> likely best measured in weeks and 0.12 seems a realistic 
> target for them. If they are fixed earlier, we could consider 
> bringing forward the schedule for 0.12.
> 
> Thoughts ?
> Regards,
> Marnie
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Rajith Attapattu 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
> > We do have two serious regressions in QPID-3214 & QPID-3216
> >
> > But I don't think we should stop the release as I don't 
> believe we can 
> > fix them quickly and safely enough to make this release 
> viable. We are 
> > trying very hard to release often and I don't want to 
> jeopardize that.
> > Since we do have another release coming in another 2 
> months, there is
> > no point delaying this release any further.
> >
> > Therefore IMO we should "release-note" these issues and go ahead. 
> > Another option is to do an errata just for the java client (or any 
> > other component with a similar problem) as soon as we are confident 
> > about the fixes.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rajith
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Robbie Gemmell 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Robbie
> > >
> > > On 14 April 2011 15:39, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello, everyone.  The blocker issue raised earlier this week has 
> > >> been resolved.  There's more information, including 
> release notes, 
> > >> at the
> > release
> > >> page[1].
> > >>
> > >> The proposed final distribution of Qpid 0.10 is 
> available from the 
> > >> link below.  It's from revision 1091571 of the 0.10 branch.
> > >>
> > >>  http://people.apache.org/~astitcher/dist/qpid-0.10/
> > >>
> > >> Andrew has graciously generated and signed this distro.  It 
> > >> therefore
> > meets
> > >> the requirements for a vote.
> > >>
> > >> If you favor releasing this distribution as Qpid 0.10, vote +1.
> > >>
> > >> If you are aware of problems that ought to prevent this 
> > >> distribution
> > from
> > >> being released, vote -1.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Justin
> > >>
> > >> ---
> > >> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/0.10+Release
> > >>
> > >> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --
> > >> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> > >> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> > >> Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> > Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
> >
> >
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to