On 17 January 2013 22:19, Rajith Attapattu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Robbie Gemmell > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ( ( ...and in continuation of this one-thought-per-email demonstration, > it > > further occurs to me that you can reset 'read only' messages and then use > > them again so I guess thats going back to the original question hehe ) ) > > The default behavior we provide guards against all these things. > If a user make a conscious decision to alter the default behavior (i.e > to preserve the original ID) then they should also consider the > implications of such an approach. > It would be impossible to make software completely idiot proof. > > Ideally the documentation that describes this config option should > have a warning about the perils of reusing the message as it can send > a number of messages with the same message id. > > Rajith > > > I was actually asking Hiram what ActiveMQ does...
