[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13960508#comment-13960508
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-5615:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit 1584931 from [~godfrer] in branch 'qpid/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1584931 ]
QPID-5615 : [Java Broker] Migrate broker config store to use same API as
VirtualHost config store
> [Java Broker] Broker and VirtualHost should use the same API for
> configuration stores
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-5615
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5615
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Java Broker
> Reporter: Rob Godfrey
> Assignee: Rob Godfrey
>
> Currently there are two different interfaces for the persisting of configured
> object, one which is used by objects that live directly under the broker, and
> one which is used by objects underneath the virtual host.
> The two APIs should be unified, the recovery process should me made generic,
> and a standardised way of differentiating between objects which inherit their
> parents store and those which manage their own should be made (Broker and
> VirtualHost should not be special-cased in any store logic).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
