[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14066883#comment-14066883
]
Keith Wall commented on QPID-5615:
----------------------------------
Looks like quite of lot if not all of this work is done, however it is not
clear to me if Rob's last question has been addressed.
> [Java Broker] Broker and VirtualHost should use the same API for
> configuration stores
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-5615
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5615
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Java Broker
> Reporter: Rob Godfrey
> Assignee: Rob Godfrey
> Fix For: 0.29
>
>
> Currently there are two different interfaces for the persisting of configured
> object, one which is used by objects that live directly under the broker, and
> one which is used by objects underneath the virtual host.
> The two APIs should be unified, the recovery process should me made generic,
> and a standardised way of differentiating between objects which inherit their
> parents store and those which manage their own should be made (Broker and
> VirtualHost should not be special-cased in any store logic).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
