[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14075504#comment-14075504 ]
Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-5615: ----------------------------------- Commit 1613739 from [~godfrer] in branch 'qpid/trunk' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1613739 ] Removes the old ConfigurationEntryStore(s) and migrates all code to using the same set of generic stores, enabling the broker to use Derby, Memory, JDBC, etc as well as a JSON store > [Java Broker] Broker and VirtualHost should use the same API for > configuration stores > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: QPID-5615 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5615 > Project: Qpid > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Java Broker > Reporter: Rob Godfrey > Assignee: Rob Godfrey > Fix For: 0.29 > > > Currently there are two different interfaces for the persisting of configured > object, one which is used by objects that live directly under the broker, and > one which is used by objects underneath the virtual host. > The two APIs should be unified, the recovery process should me made generic, > and a standardised way of differentiating between objects which inherit their > parents store and those which manage their own should be made (Broker and > VirtualHost should not be special-cased in any store logic). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org