It’s a question of priority. Let’s not let the low priority stuff block the important stuff. Moving source control is urgent. I haven’t yet heard a reason why CI should delay moving source control.
> On May 10, 2016, at 3:15 PM, Jignesh Patel <jipa...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > Dear Julian, > > You do make a good point, but we have a very heavy reliance on the CI and it > will certainly help the transition. > > Since other Apache projects do have a Travis CI, Zuyu has reached out to > Roman to see if we can set this up. > > Agreed about the points that both you and Roman are making — we do need to > move fully to ASF soon. Thanks for your patience. > > Cheers, > Jignesh > >> On May 9, 2016, at 1:27 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> On May 8, 2016, at 8:39 PM, Zuyu Zhang <zzh...@pivotal.io> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, we need fix QUICKSTEP-2 before transiting to ASF. >> >> I disagree. It is much more important that you use ASF infrastructure for >> source control than for CI, and the one does not block the other. >> >> At Calcite it took a long time before we had CI running on ASF >> infrastructure. We continued to use Travis-CI, which we’d used before ASF. >> >> As Roman says, it is important for IP hygiene that commits are made directly >> to ASF git, and the sooner you switch over the better. I think you can do >> that before you transition CI. >> >> Julian >
