> I just observed something that gave me a bit of a start; it appears to me > that bindings in the teaching languages are still parsed as top-level > bindings, and not as module bindings. This is weird, because I'm pretty > confident that the definitions get wrapped in a module before expansion. > However, I'm seeing #f as the value for the 'identifier-binding' on variables > in my beginner-language stepper test cases, and in fact in the real stepper > as well.
When I was messing with the stepper, the bindings in the teaching languages were not top-level (this was back in April). I dont know if anything has changed since. I did add something to the lazy language because the stepper doesnt work with module languages, so its bindings are top-level, but I wanted them to get a break-wrap, but this should not have affected the beginning languages. And all the tests were passing at the time. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
