I'd much prefer eliminating such function calls.
On Jul 11, 2011, at 6:28 PM, Guillaume Marceau wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> * ASL incorrectly specifies >= 1 arguments required for functions and >> function calls (i.e., functions and call are not common syntax at >> that point). >> > > Stephen pointed out that function calls in BSL can invoke functions of > zero arguments. You can't define such a function, but if you get it > from a library, it works fine. > > Should I document the grammar for function calls as (name expression > ...) thorough? > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
