Hi Xinyu,

Thanks a lot for bringing up the next Ratis release!

For Ratis 3.1.3, the slowness was due to the underlying gRPC and Netty
versions.  We have tested various gRPC and Netty version combinations.  It
seems that we have found some combinations work well.  There is a
ratis-thirdparty release VOTE going on [1].

For Ratis 3.1.4 (the π version), it is probably good to wait for the
ratis-thirdparty VOTE.  Unfortunately, it currently only has two binding
votes.  Let me ping the other PMC members to cast their vote.

BTW, thanks RkGrit for fixing the stability issues!

Tsz-Wo
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/mp19fwh7l53f5fk4t72ls3093t13rkoq



On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:35 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Attila found Ozone MapReduce tests were much slower using Ratis 3.1.3
> HDDS-12103 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12103>
> Was the regression fixed in 3.1.4?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:19 PM Xinyu Tan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Recently, we’ve fixed a series of stability issues related to Ratis
> > membership changes, including 6 commits from RkGrit.
> >
> > Now, the new release of IoTDB would like to depend on a Ratis release
> that
> > includes these fixes. I’d like to know if community has suggestions or
> > feedback if I take on the role of release manager to publish version
> 3.1.4,
> > mainly consisting of these small bug fixes.
> >
> > If there are no major concerns, I plan to start the voting process before
> > the May Day holiday in China.
> >
> > Best
> > --------------
> > Xinyu Tan
> >
>

Reply via email to