Hi, Tsz-Wo Thanks a lot! We will wait for the thirdparty to release. Hope it can be completed before the May Day holiday.
Do you have any more recommended commits for 3.1.4? Best ------------- Xinyu Tan On 2025/04/25 04:31:19 Tsz-Wo Nicholas Sze wrote: > Hi Xinyu, > > Thanks a lot for bringing up the next Ratis release! > > For Ratis 3.1.3, the slowness was due to the underlying gRPC and Netty > versions. We have tested various gRPC and Netty version combinations. It > seems that we have found some combinations work well. There is a > ratis-thirdparty release VOTE going on [1]. > > For Ratis 3.1.4 (the π version), it is probably good to wait for the > ratis-thirdparty VOTE. Unfortunately, it currently only has two binding > votes. Let me ping the other PMC members to cast their vote. > > BTW, thanks RkGrit for fixing the stability issues! > > Tsz-Wo > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/mp19fwh7l53f5fk4t72ls3093t13rkoq > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:35 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Attila found Ozone MapReduce tests were much slower using Ratis 3.1.3 > > HDDS-12103 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12103> > > Was the regression fixed in 3.1.4? > > > > Thanks > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:19 PM Xinyu Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Recently, we’ve fixed a series of stability issues related to Ratis > > > membership changes, including 6 commits from RkGrit. > > > > > > Now, the new release of IoTDB would like to depend on a Ratis release > > that > > > includes these fixes. I’d like to know if community has suggestions or > > > feedback if I take on the role of release manager to publish version > > 3.1.4, > > > mainly consisting of these small bug fixes. > > > > > > If there are no major concerns, I plan to start the voting process before > > > the May Day holiday in China. > > > > > > Best > > > -------------- > > > Xinyu Tan > > > > > >
