> ... Hope it can be completed before the May Day holiday.

Do you mean the first week of May?  If you are in a hurry, please feel free
to roll a release without waiting for anything.  We could roll another
release (say 3.2.0) afterward.

> Do you have any more recommended commits for 3.1.4?

For 3.1.4, how about we first remove the gRPC zero-copy from the master [1]
?  Just have checked the master-tmp branch [2].  It seems that all the
commits should be included in 3.1.4.  What do you think?

Tsz-Wo

[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/27b2518ytpbkwknfpg6orzqd9vx1olxt
[2] https://github.com/szetszwo/ratis/tree/master-tmp


On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 2:52 AM Xinyu Tan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, Tsz-Wo
>
> Thanks a lot! We will wait for the thirdparty to release. Hope it can be
> completed before the May Day holiday.
>
> Do you have any more recommended commits for 3.1.4?
>
> Best
> -------------
> Xinyu Tan
>
> On 2025/04/25 04:31:19 Tsz-Wo Nicholas Sze wrote:
> > Hi Xinyu,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for bringing up the next Ratis release!
> >
> > For Ratis 3.1.3, the slowness was due to the underlying gRPC and Netty
> > versions.  We have tested various gRPC and Netty version combinations.
> It
> > seems that we have found some combinations work well.  There is a
> > ratis-thirdparty release VOTE going on [1].
> >
> > For Ratis 3.1.4 (the π version), it is probably good to wait for the
> > ratis-thirdparty VOTE.  Unfortunately, it currently only has two binding
> > votes.  Let me ping the other PMC members to cast their vote.
> >
> > BTW, thanks RkGrit for fixing the stability issues!
> >
> > Tsz-Wo
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/mp19fwh7l53f5fk4t72ls3093t13rkoq
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:35 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Attila found Ozone MapReduce tests were much slower using Ratis 3.1.3
> > > HDDS-12103 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12103>
> > > Was the regression fixed in 3.1.4?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:19 PM Xinyu Tan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Recently, we’ve fixed a series of stability issues related to Ratis
> > > > membership changes, including 6 commits from RkGrit.
> > > >
> > > > Now, the new release of IoTDB would like to depend on a Ratis release
> > > that
> > > > includes these fixes. I’d like to know if community has suggestions
> or
> > > > feedback if I take on the role of release manager to publish version
> > > 3.1.4,
> > > > mainly consisting of these small bug fixes.
> > > >
> > > > If there are no major concerns, I plan to start the voting process
> before
> > > > the May Day holiday in China.
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > --------------
> > > > Xinyu Tan
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to