The certs aren't encoded in the codebase annotation, but sent in packets as 
strings and bytes that are used to reconstruct the certificates during 
discovery.

The certs are also included in the jar file. If Download permission hasn't been 
granted, the classes can't be defined.  DownloadPermission is incorrectly 
named, it should be called DefineClassPermission.

Regards,

Peter.

Sent from my Samsung device.
 
  Include original message
---- Original message ----
From: Michał Kłeczek <mic...@kleczek.org>
Sent: 14/02/2017 01:45:43 am
To: dev@river.apache.org
Subject: Re: OSGi NP Complete Was: OSGi - deserialization remote invocation 
strategy

Peter wrote: 
> The codebase is signed and download permission is granted only to the signed 
>codebase. 
What is "signed codebase"? How do you encode the signature in the  
codebase annotation? 

Codebase of what service? 
All of them? 

Thanks, 
Michal 

> 
> 
> Sent from my Samsung device. 
>    
>    Include original message 
> ---- Original message ---- 
> From: Michał Kłeczek<mic...@kleczek.org> 
> Sent: 14/02/2017 01:27:09 am 
> To: dev@river.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: OSGi NP Complete Was: OSGi - deserialization remote invocation 
>strategy 
> 
> See below. 
> 
> Peter wrote: 
>>   Using one of the secure discovery providers with authentication and input 
>>validation.  Download and deserialization permissions are granted dynamically 
>>just after authentication, but before download. 
> But now you just moved trust decisions to SafeServiceRegistrar  
> implementation. 
> It is even worse than with "CodeDownloadingSmartProxyWrapper" because 
> SafeServiceRegistrar implementation classes are dynamically downloaded 
> while the CodeDownloadingSmartProxyWrapper class is local. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Michal 
> 
> 


Reply via email to