+1

Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org> 于2023年9月24日周日 18:20写道:

> +1(Non-binding)
> I've checked:
>
> [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> [OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> [OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> [OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> [OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> [OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
>
>
> At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xdk...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >
> >This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
> >
> >This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> >
> >The artifacts:
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
> >
> >The staging repo:
> >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
> >
> >Git tag for the release:
> >https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
> >
> >
> >Hash for the release tag:
> >1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
> >
> >Release Notes:
> >https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
> >
> >
> >The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> >29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys
> file:
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> >
> >Checklist for reference,
> >Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> >Fill in the following:
> >
> >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> >[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> >[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> >[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> >[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> >[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> >[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> >[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> >[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> >[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> >[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> >
> >And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> >
> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> >
> >Please vote accordingly:
> >
> >[ ] +1 approve
> >
> >[ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


-- 
   =============================================

  fuyou001
Best Regards

Reply via email to