+1 I have checked: [OK ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the source package. [OK ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK ] License and Notice are correct in the source package.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 2:01 PM qiaoao <qiao...@foxmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > > 2023年9月22日 15:10，L K <xdk...@outlook.com> 写道： > > > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > > This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ. > > > > This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. > > > > The artifacts: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/ > > > > The staging repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248 > > > > Git tag for the release: > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4 > > > > > > Hash for the release tag: > > 1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9 > > > > Release Notes: > > https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4 > > > > > > The artifacts have been signed with Key : > > 29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys > file: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS > > > > Checklist for reference, > > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking > releases. > > Fill in the following: > > > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > > [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > release. > > [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > > [] License and Notice are correct in source package. > > [] License and Notice are correct in binary package. > > [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > > [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > > [] The code can be built success in the source package. > > [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start > > [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct > > > > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to > this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of > votes are reached. > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > The Apache RocketMQ Team > >
