+1

zhouxzhan <zhouxz...@apache.org> 于2023年9月26日周二 13:55写道:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:44 PM fuyou <fuyou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org> 于2023年9月24日周日 18:20写道:
> >
> > > +1(Non-binding)
> > > I've checked:
> > >
> > > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > > [OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > > release.
> > > [OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > > [OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > > [OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > > [OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > > [OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xdk...@outlook.com> wrote:
> > > >Hello RocketMQ Community,
> > > >
> > > >This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
> > > >
> > > >This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> > > >
> > > >The artifacts:
> > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
> > > >
> > > >The staging repo:
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
> > > >
> > > >Git tag for the release:
> > > >https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Hash for the release tag:
> > > >1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
> > > >
> > > >Release Notes:
> > > >https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> > > >29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys
> > > file:
> > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> > > >
> > > >Checklist for reference,
> > > >Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking
> > releases.
> > > >Fill in the following:
> > > >
> > > >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > > >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > > >[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > release.
> > > >[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > > >[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > > >[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > > >[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > > >[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > > >[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > > >[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > > >[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > > >[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> > > >
> > > >And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> > > this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> > > >
> > > >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> > > votes are reached.
> > > >
> > > >Please vote accordingly:
> > > >
> > > >[ ] +1 approve
> > > >
> > > >[ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >
> > > >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Thanks,
> > > >The Apache RocketMQ Team
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >    =============================================
> >
> >   fuyou001
> > Best Regards
> >

Reply via email to