Carlos, Even if we "can" use ET-Line on the website, can we replace it now with something ALv2 compatible? That way we won't have to revisit this topic later, and I can make my mockup look more like your site, which might help me continue to keep working on Royale full-time.
Please? -Alex On 1/4/18, 8:14 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Hi Justin, > >as stated by apache legal in the ticket where we discussed the website, is >perfectly legal, since our website is only a marketing tool and no >something that users will download as part of Apache Royale technology >that >we build. > >In case we want to make a website build with royale and provide the code, >I >think we should not use it since in that case the website will be part of >the code we deliver. But that's not the case at least in the next several >months or years. > >Thanks > >Carlos > >2018-01-04 13:59 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean <[email protected]>: > >> >> But the ET lines font used in the site [1] is not from Google Fonts and >> under a GPL license (AFAICS). Can we use that in a offical Apache TLP >>web >> site? I’m not sure and IMO it would be best to ask on legal discuss to >>see >> if it’s OK OR select another icon font that is compatible with ALv2. >> >> -- >> Carlos Rovira >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me% >>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccb76299385a14b989b3208 >>d5538e52ae%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63650679309204496 >>6&sdata=BylxbJRt5WKFmo6GNzwrJMhm6YD%2BpBzVfbohnq8qzOg%3D&reserved=0 >> >> >>
