Hi Alex, I'll see other options. In fact that part of the home was done only as something temporal and I want to replace for other material
2018-01-04 18:46 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > Carlos, > > Even if we "can" use ET-Line on the website, can we replace it now with > something ALv2 compatible? That way we won't have to revisit this topic > later, and I can make my mockup look more like your site, which might help > me continue to keep working on Royale full-time. > > Please? > -Alex > > On 1/4/18, 8:14 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" > <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > > >Hi Justin, > > > >as stated by apache legal in the ticket where we discussed the website, is > >perfectly legal, since our website is only a marketing tool and no > >something that users will download as part of Apache Royale technology > >that > >we build. > > > >In case we want to make a website build with royale and provide the code, > >I > >think we should not use it since in that case the website will be part of > >the code we deliver. But that's not the case at least in the next several > >months or years. > > > >Thanks > > > >Carlos > > > >2018-01-04 13:59 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>: > > > >> > >> But the ET lines font used in the site [1] is not from Google Fonts and > >> under a GPL license (AFAICS). Can we use that in a offical Apache TLP > >>web > >> site? I’m not sure and IMO it would be best to ask on legal discuss to > >>see > >> if it’s OK OR select another icon font that is compatible with ALv2. > >> > >> -- > >> Carlos Rovira > >> > >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me% > >>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > 7Ccb76299385a14b989b3208 > >>d5538e52ae%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > 7C63650679309204496 > >>6&sdata=BylxbJRt5WKFmo6GNzwrJMhm6YD%2BpBzVfbohnq8qzOg%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> > >> > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
