This is for doc, not code so I'm not sure the issue I raised matters. That said, I've been reading this [1] and it seems like we should be able to set up a few templates sort of like we did flex.a.o and not worry so much about customizing a third-party theme.
[1] https://jekyllrb.com/docs On 1/18/18, 5:28 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]> wrote: >Carlos, > >I like your findings jeckyll theme doc. > >It looks like we may have again similar issue with license as we have in >MDLExample. > >Can someone raise jira for both cases? Alex raises question on legal >couple >of days ago. No responses. Let's not wait block us with it - push things >forward. Jira could be better to do this. > >Thanks, >Piotr > >On Fri, Jan 19, 2018, 02:08 Justin Mclean <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > I think this looks very good and seems to be responsive >> > >> > >>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmistic >>100.github.io%2Fjekyll-bootstrap-doc&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C >>9c168d0de9074f2fc06108d55edbea4f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7 >>C0%7C636519220978547047&sdata=cUfWYBGYEBBEd%2FpwSfe9bxwJd6N%2BmnyMC0pK%2F >>EepY8o%3D&reserved=0 >> > [2] >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>om%2Fallejo%2Fjekyll-docs-theme&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9c168 >>d0de9074f2fc06108d55edbea4f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C >>636519220978547047&sdata=hY3xQXdzTO8RFF7COWVNJtd%2BzoXqck04VV68TxcIKFs%3D >>&reserved=0 >> >> From a quick look this contains CSS code licensed under CC-BY-3.0 (looks >> like it comes from bootstrap docs). That may or may not be an issue, >> depending on the current conversation around this on legal discuss, and >> what you want to do with it. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin
