OK, I got the CSS to load. You can hit this link: https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/test/test.html
I'm going to look into automatic TOC generation next. IMO, we should decide what kind of header/footer we want not only for the docs on this site, but for ASDoc and Olaf's TryItNow as well and start implementing it. Like this page, it may not look great right away, but we can iterate towards making it look good. My 2 cents, -Alex On 1/19/18, 1:10 AM, "Alex Harui" <[email protected]> wrote: >I'm out of time for today, but I tested templates and jekyll and started >to get something to work. > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.gi >thub.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ftest%2Ftest.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >%7C8d9c2ab112564497fb2608d55f1c7c23%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0 >%7C0%7C636519498299260185&sdata=2egj2BghYos4ur%2FUSpvN4Vrzh8IOj6rPngvyAJe8 >ZqM%3D&reserved=0 > >You can see the test/test.md and _layouts/docpage.html in the royals-docs >repo. The CSS file didn't load for some reason. Feel free to figure it >out or I will look into it tomorrow. > >HTH, >-Alex > >On 1/18/18, 6:08 PM, "Alex Harui" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>This is for doc, not code so I'm not sure the issue I raised matters. >> >>That said, I've been reading this [1] and it seems like we should be able >>to set up a few templates sort of like we did flex.a.o and not worry so >>much about customizing a third-party theme. >> >>[1] >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjekyllrb >>. >>com%2Fdocs&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6fca45a581614f01bbd008d55e >>e >>190da%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636519245260410634&sda >>t >>a=SnZeokcfQXRyaHs338A04ENYTLx%2FWSwo42KPSsA3S9k%3D&reserved=0 >> >>On 1/18/18, 5:28 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>Carlos, >>> >>>I like your findings jeckyll theme doc. >>> >>>It looks like we may have again similar issue with license as we have in >>>MDLExample. >>> >>>Can someone raise jira for both cases? Alex raises question on legal >>>couple >>>of days ago. No responses. Let's not wait block us with it - push things >>>forward. Jira could be better to do this. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Piotr >>> >>>On Fri, Jan 19, 2018, 02:08 Justin Mclean <[email protected]> >>>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> > I think this looks very good and seems to be responsive >>>> > >>>> > >>>>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmist >>>>i >>>>c >>>>100.github.io%2Fjekyll-bootstrap-doc&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >>>>7 >>>>C >>>>9c168d0de9074f2fc06108d55edbea4f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0 >>>>% >>>>7 >>>>C0%7C636519220978547047&sdata=cUfWYBGYEBBEd%2FpwSfe9bxwJd6N%2BmnyMC0pK% >>>>2 >>>>F >>>>EepY8o%3D&reserved=0 >>>> > [2] >>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub >>>>. >>>>c >>>>om%2Fallejo%2Fjekyll-docs-theme&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9c1 >>>>6 >>>>8 >>>>d0de9074f2fc06108d55edbea4f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >>>>7 >>>>C >>>>636519220978547047&sdata=hY3xQXdzTO8RFF7COWVNJtd%2BzoXqck04VV68TxcIKFs% >>>>3 >>>>D >>>>&reserved=0 >>>> >>>> From a quick look this contains CSS code licensed under CC-BY-3.0 >>>>(looks >>>> like it comes from bootstrap docs). That may or may not be an issue, >>>> depending on the current conversation around this on legal discuss, >>>>and >>>> what you want to do with it. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Justin >> >
