I haven't been testing locally. I just push it and build it on the CI server.
I will look into building it locally. On the CI server, we are only using "Jekyll build" and not "Jekyll serve". And you will probably have to use a custom config file to override the default baseurl. Right now, the site is so small that it builds really quickly, so I don't think I care if you also just push/build/test. Just let us know when you are in there so we don't make other changes to the files. I'll post instructions for local builds once I figure it out. -Alex On 1/24/18, 2:51 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Thanks Alex, >I can see it working online :) >I'm trying to test it localy but don't know how to do it. >In order to make the html/css looks good, I need to work localy, please >let >me know how yo do it >I installed already ruby, jekyll, etc... and tried to run "bundle exec >jekyll serve" but we don't have Gem file result is: > >Could not locate Gemfile or .bundle/ directory > >Maybe there's a more easy way to test this. > >Carlos > > >2018-01-19 21:59 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > >> OK, I got the CSS to load. You can hit this link: >> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.g >>ithub.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ftest%2Ftest.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.c >>om%7Cef158780d4714a61dfb908d5637d039e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1% >>7C0%7C0%7C636524310941764543&sdata=mD2KTprJ9GvEsEjVw1k256pI8yq0BbP%2F%2Bo >>DkQhpAckI%3D&reserved=0 >> >> I'm going to look into automatic TOC generation next. IMO, we should >> decide what kind of header/footer we want not only for the docs on this >> site, but for ASDoc and Olaf's TryItNow as well and start implementing >>it. >> Like this page, it may not look great right away, but we can iterate >> towards making it look good. >> >> My 2 cents, >> -Alex >> >> On 1/19/18, 1:10 AM, "Alex Harui" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >I'm out of time for today, but I tested templates and jekyll and >>started >> >to get something to work. >> > >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> https%3A%2F%2Fapache.gi >> >thub.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ftest%2Ftest.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui% >> 40adobe.com >> >%7C8d9c2ab112564497fb2608d55f1c7c23%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >> cee1%7C0 >> >%7C0%7C636519498299260185&sdata=2egj2BghYos4ur% >> 2FUSpvN4Vrzh8IOj6rPngvyAJe8 >> >ZqM%3D&reserved=0 >> > >> >You can see the test/test.md and _layouts/docpage.html in the >>royals-docs >> >repo. The CSS file didn't load for some reason. Feel free to figure >>it >> >out or I will look into it tomorrow. >> > >> >HTH, >> >-Alex >> > >> >On 1/18/18, 6:08 PM, "Alex Harui" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>This is for doc, not code so I'm not sure the issue I raised matters. >> >> >> >>That said, I've been reading this [1] and it seems like we should be >>able >> >>to set up a few templates sort of like we did flex.a.o and not worry >>so >> >>much about customizing a third-party theme. >> >> >> >>[1] >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> https%3A%2F%2Fjekyllrb >> >>. >> >>com%2Fdocs&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >> 7C6fca45a581614f01bbd008d55e >> >>e >> >>190da%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >> 7C636519245260410634&sda >> >>t >> >>a=SnZeokcfQXRyaHs338A04ENYTLx%2FWSwo42KPSsA3S9k%3D&reserved=0 >> >> >> >>On 1/18/18, 5:28 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >> >> >>>Carlos, >> >>> >> >>>I like your findings jeckyll theme doc. >> >>> >> >>>It looks like we may have again similar issue with license as we >>have in >> >>>MDLExample. >> >>> >> >>>Can someone raise jira for both cases? Alex raises question on legal >> >>>couple >> >>>of days ago. No responses. Let's not wait block us with it - push >>things >> >>>forward. Jira could be better to do this. >> >>> >> >>>Thanks, >> >>>Piotr >> >>> >> >>>On Fri, Jan 19, 2018, 02:08 Justin Mclean <[email protected]> >> >>>wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi, >> >>>> >> >>>> > I think this looks very good and seems to be responsive >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> http%3A%2F%2Fmist >> >>>>i >> >>>>c >> >>>>>>100.github.io%2Fjekyll-bootstrap-doc&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.co >>>>>>m >> % >> >>>>7 >> >>>>C >> >>>>9c168d0de9074f2fc06108d55edbea4f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >> cee1%7C0 >> >>>>% >> >>>>7 >> >>>>C0%7C636519220978547047&sdata=cUfWYBGYEBBEd% >> 2FpwSfe9bxwJd6N%2BmnyMC0pK% >> >>>>2 >> >>>>F >> >>>>EepY8o%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>> > [2] >> >>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub >> >>>>. >> >>>>c >> >>>>om%2Fallejo%2Fjekyll-docs-theme&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >> %7C9c1 >> >>>>6 >> >>>>8 >> >>>>d0de9074f2fc06108d55edbea4f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >> cee1%7C0%7C0% >> >>>>7 >> >>>>C >> >>>>636519220978547047&sdata=hY3xQXdzTO8RFF7COWVNJtd% >> 2BzoXqck04VV68TxcIKFs% >> >>>>3 >> >>>>D >> >>>>&reserved=0 >> >>>> >> >>>> From a quick look this contains CSS code licensed under CC-BY-3.0 >> >>>>(looks >> >>>> like it comes from bootstrap docs). That may or may not be an >>issue, >> >>>> depending on the current conversation around this on legal discuss, >> >>>>and >> >>>> what you want to do with it. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> Justin >> >> >> > >> >> > > >-- >Carlos Rovira >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2 >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cef158780d4714a61dfb908d5 >637d039e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636524310941764543&s >data=J7QoUjj3VjvkcYhHaGAdqW3%2B8XU0a2ctG04LorBuYWI%3D&reserved=0
