Oh. I guess that’s why the styling did not work. Carlos, what compiler options are needed for Jewel?
Harbs > On May 17, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is another issue. You cannot build those examples using IDE. I think > we should raise on GitHub. I also cannot build those examples in Moonshine. > Something needs to be configured. Probably some additional args for > compiler related to theme etc. > > 2018-05-17 13:18 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > >> VSCode using asconfigc >> >>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Harbs, >>> >>> How did you build the examples? Using VSCode or script ant/maven ? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Piotr >>> >>> 2018-05-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto: >> harbs.li...@gmail.com>>: >>> >>>> FWIW, it looks to me like the only thing that will not work in the blog >>>> post is <j:View> needs to be <js:View> and <j:TextPrompt> needs to be >>>> <js:TextPromptBead> >>>> >>>> Although when I compile styles are definitely missing. >>>> >>>> Yeah. Jewel is definitely missing important pieces… :-( >>>> >>>> Harbs >>>> >>>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> You are right. I missed this. >>>>> >>>>> What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work? >>>>> >>>>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org >>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>>> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I think you missed one important point I >>>>>> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the >>>>>> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without >> all >>>>>> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have: >>>>>> >>>>>> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel >> will >>>> be >>>>>> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile >>>> you >>>>>> can find it in the develop branch." >>>>>> >>>>>> and the code is tailored with the actual api. >>>>>> >>>>>> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship >>>> with >>>>>> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the >> latest >>>> 2 >>>>>> months. I think this is crucial. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Piotr Zarzycki >>> >>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki < >> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki> >>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/ >> piotrzarzycki>>* >> >> > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
