I don't care what version number we give it as long as it is <1. I'm more
concerned about what commit hash we are going to use. I see a great discussion
going on about package re-organization, however, that is probably not going to
be ready to release soon.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 5/26/18, 6:23 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Om,
there's many changes since 0.9.2, so I was thinking the same as you. We
don't need to go to 0.9.4, we can skip to 0.9.5 or as you say, 0.10.0
thanks
2018-05-26 15:20 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>:
> I just remembered that we have already pushed a 0.9.3 release to npm. We
> will not be able to re release that version. Perhaps we just skip to
0.9.4
> version next?
>
> Or even 0.10.0?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2018, 12:17 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Alex,
> >
> > I committed as well some poms that needed change from 0.9.4 to 0.9.3
> > snapshot. We'll need to check why this ones are not update to the new
> > version when doing a prepare release.
> >
> > I'll try as well to summarize briefly the discussion about
reorganization
> > so people could check easily the main points of what we are discussing,
> > hope that helps to take decisions and go forward
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-05-25 21:37 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > In case folks are wondering, I deleted the release/0.9.3 branches from
> > all
> > > 3 repos. There have been changes made in each of the branches since
> the
> > > branches were cut and there were also issues with the royale-compiler
> and
> > > royale-typedefs branches not having synced version numbers to their
> > develop
> > > branches.
> > >
> > > I see a vote thread opened today on Maven's lists for the SCM plug in.
> > >
> > > AIUI, we are on hold for a release unless we get general consensus to
> > what
> > > commit hash to release from for royale-asjs.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 5/17/18, 3:02 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> > > Rovira" <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > The minimun change is to see package names change.
> > > Take into account that all is building and working ok. Only we
have
> > > problems in jsonly build since is only depends on ANT (what I
think
> > is
> > > not
> > > good, since is missing maven build), in
> > "/mustella/tests/basicTests/".
> > > Looking at what's happening in that part will solve the build.
> > >
> > > 2018-05-17 11:40 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > You are right. I missed this.
> > > >
> > > > What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
> > > >
> > > > > On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I think you missed one important point I
> > > > > posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are
> > using
> > > the
> > > > > actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3
> > > without all
> > > > > that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we
> have:
> > > > >
> > > > > "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes.
> > Jewel
> > > will
> > > > be
> > > > > available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the
> > > meanwhile
> > > > you
> > > > > can find it in the develop branch."
> > > > >
> > > > > and the code is tailored with the actual api.
> > > > >
> > > > > For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it
> can
> > > ship
> > > > with
> > > > > all that we are promising in website and social networks for
> the
> > > latest 2
> > > > > months. I think this is crucial.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %
> > > 7C9a61c338f4554b04aa9008d5bbdd5762%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636621481721528268&sdata=6FoSfupJoaFpfsqJcJ7HtHNpRoQluG
> > > Uzh6hlM21AH20%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> >
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C480f4748e4c04bcb5c8408d5c30be8bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636629378271517790&sdata=31D%2FYlvqGMoMwP2rZOdLMaSzYklK1mjgwT6jWmXpWgg%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C480f4748e4c04bcb5c8408d5c30be8bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636629378271517790&sdata=31D%2FYlvqGMoMwP2rZOdLMaSzYklK1mjgwT6jWmXpWgg%3D&reserved=0
