That change should be reverted. I added it to try and fix an issue with Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic columns.
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Harbs, > > Some time ago you have added interface IDataGridColumnList [1]. It is used > here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment > > list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer; > > But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property and build is > failing - locally. How actually it is working ? > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as > > <https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as> > [2] > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 > > <https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229> > > Thanks, > Piotr > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> napisał(a): > >> Piotr, >> >> for me its ok, but only want to point something important. I think we all >> invested many emails, hours in discussing about this. I think all positions >> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring to the plate are new, >> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that we all can get what we >> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel can't link basic, so >> it must create it's own versions. In case this could not be possible, >> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating Jewel versions of >> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and DropDownList show that I was in >> the right track, since the things I copied are modified for Jewel since >> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In Basic there's too much of >> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and that means that this >> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece of code that could be >> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs and CSS don't want to >> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will need to deal with those >> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code should help you to put >> the Pilars of other high level things without the need of looking how to >> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in Basic code when >> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things could be change in >> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here things that Basic is >> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at least), can use it. >> And Jewel can't use. >> >> Don't see other way. >> >> Let's see this as we end this release. >> >> Thanks >> >> Carlos >> >> >> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (< >> [email protected]>) >> escribió: >> >>> Hi Carlos, >>> >>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had enough problems with >>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as is. >>> >>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of that stuff after >>> release. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Piotr >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert we said to do, so >> when >>> we >>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more consistent. >>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of DataGroup I can move it >> from >>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel. >>>> Let me know if this is ok for you. >>>> >>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core to consider. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>>> [email protected]>) escribió: >>>> >>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have that changes, but >>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache to make it working. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of that. >>>>> >>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui <[email protected]> >>>>> napisał(a): >>>>> >>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and merged it into the >>>>>> integration branch. However, the Maven build in the integration >>> branch >>>>> is >>>>>> still failing. It appears to be because DataGroup got moved from >>> Basic >>>>> to >>>>>> Core. The Ant build should be failing there too. I was under the >>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not going to be in this >>>>>> release. Someone else will have to deal with resolving these >> issues. >>>> I >>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them out. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> -Alex >>>>>> >>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex! >>>>>> >>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui <[email protected] >>> >>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>> >>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale then you can >>> pull >>>>>> those >>>>>>> changes into the integration branch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you know how to fix >>>> that >>>>> ? >>>>>>> Probably I >>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven complaining. :) >>> If >>>>> you >>>>>> won't >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>> >>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I switched to the feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop >>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the begining >>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it >>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): >>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method numItemRenderers in >>>> interface >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class DataGroup >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea >>>>>> implements >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ^ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): >>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in interface >>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea >>>>>> implements >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ^ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> *------------------------------------------------------------------------* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent >> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT >>>> .... >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>> 2.164 s] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework >>>> ........................... >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>> 0.273 s] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts >>>> .................... >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>> 1.175 s] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs >>>> ..................... >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>> 0.691 s] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core >>>> ............... >>>>>>> *FAILURE* [ >>>>>>>> 1.947 s] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Binding >>>> ............ >>>>>>> *SKIPPED* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was >> compiling >>>> and >>>>>> tested >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are still >>> unsolved. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale introduced >> some >>>> MX >>>>>> API >>>>>>> that is >>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it needs to >> add >>>> it. >>>>>> For now >>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it reach Basic >>>>> library >>>>>> it >>>>>>> could be >>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did you try to >>>>>> compile with >>>>>>> maven >>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. I'll >> return >>> to >>>>> my >>>>>> Jewel >>>>>>> duties >>>>>>>> in the meanwhile >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos Rovira (< >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and report if >> I >>>> find >>>>>> some >>>>>>> isuue. >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>>>>>>>> [email protected]>) escribió: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next version >> of >>>>>> Royale. One >>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in MXRoyale >>>> branch >>>>> to >>>>>>> develop. I >>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in MXRoyale >>> and >>>>>> develop >>>>>>> now is >>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch >>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to develop I >> would >>>> like >>>>>> to ask >>>>>>> you to >>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end - >> whether I >>>>>> didn't >>>>>>> break any >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed - please >> make >>>>>> changes and >>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>>> to that branch. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and test some >>>> Jewel >>>>>>> examples ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to see >> what >>> is >>>>>> happen. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira < >>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a integration >>> branch, >>>>>> moreover >>>>>>> since >>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way. Then >>> solve >>>>>>> conflicts in >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is >> compiling >>>> and >>>>>> working >>>>>>> fine >>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the integration >>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex Harui >>>>>>>> (<[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root folders for >>>>>> projects. I >>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>> Agent >>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and master >> may >>> be >>>>>> running >>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>> wherever >>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing. In theory, royale-compiler >>> and >>>>>>> royale-typedefs >>>>>>>>>>>> should be able to be built off master, and the >>>> other >>>>>> builds >>>>>>> should >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> able >>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the results of >>>> those >>>>>>> builds. If >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to the >>> agent >>>>>> that's >>>>>>> fine as >>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would not >> run >>> on >>>>>> master. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, >>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1] [2] >>>> It's >>>>>>> pointing for >>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>> reason >>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those one in >>>>> Program >>>>>>> Files. How >>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>> path >>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is >>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] ** >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>> *[2] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,* >>>>>>>>>>>> *Piotr* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr Zarzycki < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you >> will >>> be >>>>>> done >>>>>>> with all >>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>> changes! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs < >>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with >> ACE >>>> on >>>>>> multiple >>>>>>>>>> machines. >>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first >>> running >>>>>> ant on >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> typedefs >>>>>>>>>>>> repo and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not >>> really >>>>>> sure what >>>>>>>>>> triggered >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on >>>>>>> apacheroyaleci? >>>>>>>> Dunno… >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop >>>>> branch >>>>>> works >>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> fixing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next >>>>> couple >>>>>> of >>>>>>> days. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be >>>>>>> cherry-picked from >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this, >>>> but I >>>>>> can't >>>>>>> find it >>>>>>>>>> so I >>>>>>>>>>>> guess >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the >>> builds >>>>>> began to >>>>>>> fail >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci. The only way I was able >> to >>>> fix >>>>>> it was >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> create a >>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the >>> screen >>>>> (to >>>>>> run >>>>>>> tests) >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>> agent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and >>>> royale-typedefs >>>>>> should >>>>>>> still >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> able >>>>>>>>>>>> to use >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent. Any build issues >>>> here >>>>>> are >>>>>>> probably a >>>>>>>>>>>> matter of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place. >>> I >>>>>> think it >>>>>>> did all >>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>>> at one >>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is >>>> independent >>>>>> of any >>>>>>> issues >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have >> a >>>>> slight >>>>>>> preference >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> wait a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex >>> working, >>>>>> but if >>>>>>> I'm not >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> RM >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the >>>> merge >>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me. I was >>> also >>>>>>> pondering just >>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have switched two build on jenkins >>> to >>>>>> "master" >>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs - It seems that this >> fixes >>>>>> issue with >>>>>>>> build. - >>>>>>>>>>> Not >>>>>>>>>>>> sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay like that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working right now to fix build >> for >>>>>> module >>>>>>> Icons. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr >>>> Zarzycki < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to >>>>>> build.xml, if >>>>>>> it won't >>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>>> I will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr >>> Zarzycki < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing >> build >>>>> [1]. >>>>>> It >>>>>>>> complaining >>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs >>> does >>>>> not >>>>>>> exist" and >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is >>>> being >>>>>> build >>>>>>> to that >>>>>>>>>>> folder >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files >>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr >>>> Zarzycki >>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to notify Infra about >>> problem >>>>> with >>>>>>> build on >>>>>>>>>> b.a.o. >>>>>>>>>>>> Locally >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is perfectly fine. I will >>>>> attach >>>>>> dev >>>>>>> list and >>>>>>>>>>> write >>>>>>>>>>>> email >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto: >>>>>>> [email protected]>. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos >>> Rovira < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Piotr!, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you said discussion is not over, >>>> but I >>>>>> think >>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>> discussed >>>>>>>>>>>> almost >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things and plans was left for >>> releases >>>>>> "post >>>>>>> 0.9.3". In >>>>>>>>>>> fact I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package name changes that was the >>> only >>>>>> point >>>>>>> that was >>>>>>>>>> making >>>>>>>>>>>> us not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this >>> point >>>>>> safe to >>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3, >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to call it :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I'm this days >> wanting >>>> to >>>>>> finish >>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>>>> in Jewel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will make it pretty usable in an >>> stable >>>>>> way, for >>>>>>> me >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>> points are: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * End Jewel Table and Jewel List >>> remove >>>>> and >>>>>>> update data >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel NumericStepper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel DropdownList/Combobox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's much more to do, but I >> think >>>>> those >>>>>> three >>>>>>> points >>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>> make >>>>>>>>>>>>>> many >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people have the minimun to start >>>> working >>>>>> in real >>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale Jewel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (at least is what I need to start a >>>> real >>>>>> project >>>>>>> we >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale, so I'm working hard to >>> complete >>>>>> these >>>>>>> points). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to make this asap, so hope >>>>>> something of >>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>>>>> could go >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35, >>> Piotr >>>>>> Zarzycki >>>>>>> (< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto: >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no objections to that. The >>>>> question >>>>>>> whether >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of view Maven which is I believe >> big >>>>> part >>>>>> of >>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>> process >>>>>>>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complain. We will see. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for confirmation, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash >>>>>> Muppirala < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, since 0.9.3 was already >> pushed >>>> out >>>>>> via >>>>>>> npm [1], >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skip to 0.9.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM >>> Piotr >>>>>> Zarzycki >>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> <mailto: >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a while since last >>> version >>>>> of >>>>>>> Royale was >>>>>>>>>>>> released. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to start process of releasing >>>> current >>>>>> version >>>>>>> no >>>>>>>>>> matter >>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right now. I know that we have >>>>> probably >>>>>>> unfinished >>>>>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core changes. I'm suggesting >> leave >>>> it >>>>>> for the >>>>>>> next >>>>>>>>>>>> release. I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be release manager. I will >>> study >>>>>> carefully >>>>>>> what >>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to get help with all of the >>>>> issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that we have failing >>> typedefs >>>> - >>>>> I >>>>>>> cleaned up >>>>>>>>>>>> workspace and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. If #576 fail I will ask >>> infra >>>>> for >>>>>>> advice. [2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do I need to know anything in >> case >>>> of >>>>>> release >>>>>>> Royale >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> npm ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your last >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion here [3] is still up >> ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about emulation branch - >> Can >>> I >>>>>> merge it >>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>> develop ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything what can hold >>> that >>>>>> release ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>> > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>>*
