No this is not that line. That's the next one which is commented right now. [1]. Uncomment line to see error. Maven is failing with error which is valid[2]
[1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/ed55aee86e92d36397a52cffd44df1fa56393c5f/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/beads/itemRenderers/RemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData.as#L135 [2] https://paste.apache.org/8mlQ Thanks, Piotr pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:23 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> napisał(a): > Piotr, > > let me see if I understand the problem. That line: > > itemRendererParent.removeItemRenderer(ir); > > is making compilation fail? > > That would be very strange since my compilation succeeded. and seems the > line is ok. If so it could be a similar problem to the one we saw recently > in witch compilation was ok localy but failing in the server. > > Let me know about this problem to see what I should take care > > thanks! > > Carlos > > > > > El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:13, Piotr Zarzycki (< > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > Ok understand. Thanks for explanation. If you could look into that how to > > achieve that without build fail that would be great. > > > > Piotr > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:11 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > > napisał(a): > > > > > Hi Piotr, > > > > > > Table component uses TBodyContentArea as IContentView instead of > > DataGroup, > > > so the IItemRendererParent needs its own implementation. > > > Inside TBody(<tbody>), we have each item render as a TableRow (<tr>), > > that > > > has inside a TableCell (<td>) and then the TableItemRenderer. > > > So when adding, removing, and so on from the dataProvider to manage the > > > item renderers you need to create or destroy this structure. > > > > > > So if you see the code, you'll that I'm removing the cells inside the > row > > > and the itemrender inside the cell so signaling the appropriate removal > > of > > > listeners. > > > > > > Hope this explanation solve your doubt > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 12:50, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > > > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > > > > > Question to one of your class. Why are you doing two times removing > [1] > > > and > > > > couple of lines later you are doing removeElement ? It shouldn't > event > > > work > > > > because there is no method removeElement in that interface. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/62265d52abdf34f797dc7582841ed029d8fb0cff/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/beads/itemRenderers/RemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData.as#L131 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 12:18 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > That change should be reverted. I added it to try and fix an issue > > with > > > > > Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic columns. > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Harbs, > > > > > > > > > > > > Some time ago you have added interface IDataGridColumnList [1]. > It > > is > > > > > used > > > > > > here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment > > > > > > > > > > > > list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer; > > > > > > > > > > > > But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property and build > is > > > > > > failing - locally. How actually it is working ? > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org > > > > <mailto: > > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org>> napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > >> Piotr, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> for me its ok, but only want to point something important. I > think > > > we > > > > > all > > > > > >> invested many emails, hours in discussing about this. I think > all > > > > > positions > > > > > >> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring to the > plate > > > are > > > > > new, > > > > > >> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that we all can > get > > > > what > > > > > we > > > > > >> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel can't link > > > basic, > > > > > so > > > > > >> it must create it's own versions. In case this could not be > > > possible, > > > > > >> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating Jewel > > versions > > > > of > > > > > >> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and DropDownList show > > that I > > > > > was in > > > > > >> the right track, since the things I copied are modified for > Jewel > > > > since > > > > > >> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In Basic there's > too > > > > much > > > > > of > > > > > >> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and that means > that > > > > this > > > > > >> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece of code > that > > > > > could be > > > > > >> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs and CSS > > don't > > > > > want to > > > > > >> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will need to deal > > with > > > > > those > > > > > >> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code should help > > you > > > > to > > > > > put > > > > > >> the Pilars of other high level things without the need of > looking > > > how > > > > to > > > > > >> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in Basic code > > > when > > > > > >> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things could be > > change > > > in > > > > > >> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here things > that > > > > Basic > > > > > is > > > > > >> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at least), > can > > > use > > > > > it. > > > > > >> And Jewel can't use. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Don't see other way. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Let's see this as we end this release. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Carlos > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > > > > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) > > > > > >> escribió: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Hi Carlos, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had enough problems > > > with > > > > > >>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as is. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of that stuff > > > after > > > > > >>> release. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Thanks, > > > > > >>> Piotr > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira < > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org> > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> Hi, > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert we said to > do, > > > so > > > > > >> when > > > > > >>> we > > > > > >>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more consistent. > > > > > >>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of DataGroup I can > > move > > > it > > > > > >> from > > > > > >>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel. > > > > > >>>> Let me know if this is ok for you. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core to consider. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > > > > >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have that > changes, > > > but > > > > > >>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache to make it > > > > working. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of that. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > > > > > > > > >>>>> napisał(a): > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and merged it > into > > > the > > > > > >>>>>> integration branch. However, the Maven build in the > > integration > > > > > >>> branch > > > > > >>>>> is > > > > > >>>>>> still failing. It appears to be because DataGroup got moved > > > from > > > > > >>> Basic > > > > > >>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>> Core. The Ant build should be failing there too. I was > under > > > the > > > > > >>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not going to be > in > > > > this > > > > > >>>>>> release. Someone else will have to deal with resolving > these > > > > > >> issues. > > > > > >>>> I > > > > > >>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them out. > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>> -Alex > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex! > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> napisał(a): > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale then you can > > > > > >>> pull > > > > > >>>>>> those > > > > > >>>>>>> changes into the integration branch. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> -Alex > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > > > > >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi Carlos, > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you know how to > fix > > > > > >>>> that > > > > > >>>>> ? > > > > > >>>>>>> Probably I > > > > > >>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven complaining. > :) > > > > > >>> If > > > > > >>>>> you > > > > > >>>>>> won't > > > > > >>>>>>> have > > > > > >>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>> Piotr > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira < > > > > > >>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> napisał(a): > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> I switched to the feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop > > > > > >>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the begining > > > > > >>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it > > > > > >>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): > > > > > >>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method numItemRenderers in > > > > > >>>> interface > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class DataGroup > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea > > > > > >>>>>> implements > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> ^ > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): > > > > > >>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in interface > > > > > >>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > > > > > >>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea > > > > > >>>>>> implements > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> ^ > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *------------------------------------------------------------------------* > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:* > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent > > > > > >> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT > > > > > >>>> .... > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2.164 s] > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework > > > > > >>>> ........................... > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > > > > > >>>>>>>> 0.273 s] > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts > > > > > >>>> .................... > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.175 s] > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs > > > > > >>>> ..................... > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > > > > > >>>>>>>> 0.691 s] > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core > > > > > >>>> ............... > > > > > >>>>>>> *FAILURE* [ > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.947 s] > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Binding > > > > > >>>> ............ > > > > > >>>>>>> *SKIPPED* > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was > > > > > >> compiling > > > > > >>>> and > > > > > >>>>>> tested > > > > > >>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are still > > > > > >>> unsolved. > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale introduced > > > > > >> some > > > > > >>>> MX > > > > > >>>>>> API > > > > > >>>>>>> that is > > > > > >>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it needs to > > > > > >> add > > > > > >>>> it. > > > > > >>>>>> For now > > > > > >>>>>>> it > > > > > >>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it reach Basic > > > > > >>>>> library > > > > > >>>>>> it > > > > > >>>>>>> could be > > > > > >>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did you try to > > > > > >>>>>> compile with > > > > > >>>>>>> maven > > > > > >>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems? > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something? > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. I'll > > > > > >> return > > > > > >>> to > > > > > >>>>> my > > > > > >>>>>> Jewel > > > > > >>>>>>> duties > > > > > >>>>>>>> in the meanwhile > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks! > > > > > >>>>>>>> Carlos > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos Rovira (< > > > > > >>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>>>>>> ) > > > > > >>>>>>>> escribió: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and report if > > > > > >> I > > > > > >>>> find > > > > > >>>>>> some > > > > > >>>>>>> isuue. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > > > > >>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next version > > > > > >> of > > > > > >>>>>> Royale. One > > > > > >>>>>>> of the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in MXRoyale > > > > > >>>> branch > > > > > >>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>> develop. I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in MXRoyale > > > > > >>> and > > > > > >>>>>> develop > > > > > >>>>>>> now is > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch > > > > > >>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to develop I > > > > > >> would > > > > > >>>> like > > > > > >>>>>> to ask > > > > > >>>>>>> you to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end - > > > > > >> whether I > > > > > >>>>>> didn't > > > > > >>>>>>> break any > > > > > >>>>>>>> of > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed - please > > > > > >> make > > > > > >>>>>> changes and > > > > > >>>>>>>> commit > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> to that branch. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and test some > > > > > >>>> Jewel > > > > > >>>>>>> examples ? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to see > > > > > >> what > > > > > >>> is > > > > > >>>>>> happen. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Piotr > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira < > > > > > >>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a integration > > > > > >>> branch, > > > > > >>>>>> moreover > > > > > >>>>>>> since > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way. Then > > > > > >>> solve > > > > > >>>>>>> conflicts in > > > > > >>>>>>>> that > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is > > > > > >> compiling > > > > > >>>> and > > > > > >>>>>> working > > > > > >>>>>>> fine > > > > > >>>>>>>> as > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the integration > > > > > >>>>> branch. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Carlos > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex Harui > > > > > >>>>>>>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> escribió: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root folders for > > > > > >>>>>> projects. I > > > > > >>>>>>> think > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Agent > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and master > > > > > >> may > > > > > >>> be > > > > > >>>>>> running > > > > > >>>>>>> in > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wherever > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing. In theory, royale-compiler > > > > > >>> and > > > > > >>>>>>> royale-typedefs > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> should be able to be built off master, and the > > > > > >>>> other > > > > > >>>>>> builds > > > > > >>>>>>> should > > > > > >>>>>>>> be > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> able > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the results of > > > > > >>>> those > > > > > >>>>>>> builds. If > > > > > >>>>>>>> you > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> want > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to the > > > > > >>> agent > > > > > >>>>>> that's > > > > > >>>>>>> fine as > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> well. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would not > > > > > >> run > > > > > >>> on > > > > > >>>>>> master. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > > > > >>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1] [2] > > > > > >>>> It's > > > > > >>>>>>> pointing for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> some > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> reason > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those one in > > > > > >>>>> Program > > > > > >>>>>>> Files. How > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> this > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> path > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is > > > > > >>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] ** > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *[2] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,* > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Piotr* > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr Zarzycki < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you > > > > > >> will > > > > > >>> be > > > > > >>>>>> done > > > > > >>>>>>> with all > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes! > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs < > > > > > >>>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with > > > > > >> ACE > > > > > >>>> on > > > > > >>>>>> multiple > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> machines. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> was > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first > > > > > >>> running > > > > > >>>>>> ant on > > > > > >>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> typedefs > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> repo and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not > > > > > >>> really > > > > > >>>>>> sure what > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> triggered > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on > > > > > >>>>>>> apacheroyaleci? > > > > > >>>>>>>> Dunno… > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop > > > > > >>>>> branch > > > > > >>>>>> works > > > > > >>>>>>> for me > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fixing > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next > > > > > >>>>> couple > > > > > >>>>>> of > > > > > >>>>>>> days. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be > > > > > >>>>>>> cherry-picked from > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this, > > > > > >>>> but I > > > > > >>>>>> can't > > > > > >>>>>>> find it > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> so I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> guess > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the > > > > > >>> builds > > > > > >>>>>> began to > > > > > >>>>>>> fail > > > > > >>>>>>>> on > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci. The only way I was able > > > > > >> to > > > > > >>>> fix > > > > > >>>>>> it was > > > > > >>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> create a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the > > > > > >>> screen > > > > > >>>>> (to > > > > > >>>>>> run > > > > > >>>>>>> tests) > > > > > >>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> agent. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and > > > > > >>>> royale-typedefs > > > > > >>>>>> should > > > > > >>>>>>> still > > > > > >>>>>>>> be > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> able > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to use > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent. Any build issues > > > > > >>>> here > > > > > >>>>>> are > > > > > >>>>>>> probably a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> matter of > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place. > > > > > >>> I > > > > > >>>>>> think it > > > > > >>>>>>> did all > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> work > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> at one > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is > > > > > >>>> independent > > > > > >>>>>> of any > > > > > >>>>>>> issues > > > > > >>>>>>>> on > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have > > > > > >> a > > > > > >>>>> slight > > > > > >>>>>>> preference > > > > > >>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wait a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex > > > > > >>> working, > > > > > >>>>>> but if > > > > > >>>>>>> I'm not > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RM > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the > > > > > >>>> merge > > > > > >>>>>> from > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me. I was > > > > > >>> also > > > > > >>>>>>> pondering just > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have switched two build on jenkins > > > > > >>> to > > > > > >>>>>> "master" > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs - It seems that this > > > > > >> fixes > > > > > >>>>>> issue with > > > > > >>>>>>>> build. - > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Not > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> sure > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay like that. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working right now to fix build > > > > > >> for > > > > > >>>>>> module > > > > > >>>>>>> Icons. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr > > > > > >>>> Zarzycki < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to > > > > > >>>>>> build.xml, if > > > > > >>>>>>> it won't > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> work > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I will > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr > > > > > >>> Zarzycki < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing > > > > > >> build > > > > > >>>>> [1]. > > > > > >>>>>> It > > > > > >>>>>>>> complaining > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs > > > > > >>> does > > > > > >>>>> not > > > > > >>>>>>> exist" and > > > > > >>>>>>>> it > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would be > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is > > > > > >>>> being > > > > > >>>>>> build > > > > > >>>>>>> to that > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> folder > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files > > > > > >>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs". > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr > > > > > >>>> Zarzycki > > > > > >>>>> < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to notify Infra about > > > > > >>> problem > > > > > >>>>> with > > > > > >>>>>>> build on > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> b.a.o. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Locally > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is perfectly fine. I will > > > > > >>>>> attach > > > > > >>>>>> dev > > > > > >>>>>>> list and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> write > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> email > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org <mailto: > > > > > >>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org>. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos > > > > > >>> Rovira < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Piotr!, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you said discussion is not over, > > > > > >>>> but I > > > > > >>>>>> think > > > > > >>>>>>> we > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> discussed > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> almost > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things and plans was left for > > > > > >>> releases > > > > > >>>>>> "post > > > > > >>>>>>> 0.9.3". In > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> fact I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package name changes that was the > > > > > >>> only > > > > > >>>>>> point > > > > > >>>>>>> that was > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> making > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> us not > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this > > > > > >>> point > > > > > >>>>>> safe to > > > > > >>>>>>> release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.4 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to call it :) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I'm this days > > > > > >> wanting > > > > > >>>> to > > > > > >>>>>> finish > > > > > >>>>>>> some > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> things > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> in Jewel > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will make it pretty usable in an > > > > > >>> stable > > > > > >>>>>> way, for > > > > > >>>>>>> me > > > > > >>>>>>>> that > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> points are: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * End Jewel Table and Jewel List > > > > > >>> remove > > > > > >>>>> and > > > > > >>>>>>> update data > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel NumericStepper > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel DropdownList/Combobox > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's much more to do, but I > > > > > >> think > > > > > >>>>> those > > > > > >>>>>> three > > > > > >>>>>>> points > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> will > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> make > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> many > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people have the minimun to start > > > > > >>>> working > > > > > >>>>>> in real > > > > > >>>>>>> Apache > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale Jewel > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (at least is what I need to start a > > > > > >>>> real > > > > > >>>>>> project > > > > > >>>>>>> we > > > > > >>>>>>>> have > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> now > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale, so I'm working hard to > > > > > >>> complete > > > > > >>>>>> these > > > > > >>>>>>> points). > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to make this asap, so hope > > > > > >>>>>> something of > > > > > >>>>>>> those > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> point > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> could go > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release :) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35, > > > > > >>> Piotr > > > > > >>>>>> Zarzycki > > > > > >>>>>>> (< > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no objections to that. The > > > > > >>>>> question > > > > > >>>>>>> whether > > > > > >>>>>>>> from > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of view Maven which is I believe > > > > > >> big > > > > > >>>>> part > > > > > >>>>>> of > > > > > >>>>>>> release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> process > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> won't > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complain. We will see. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for confirmation, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash > > > > > >>>>>> Muppirala < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> bigosma...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, since 0.9.3 was already > > > > > >> pushed > > > > > >>>> out > > > > > >>>>>> via > > > > > >>>>>>> npm [1], > > > > > >>>>>>>> it > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would be > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best if > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skip to 0.9.4 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM > > > > > >>> Piotr > > > > > >>>>>> Zarzycki > > > > > >>>>>>> < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > >> <mailto: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a while since last > > > > > >>> version > > > > > >>>>> of > > > > > >>>>>>> Royale was > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> released. I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to start process of releasing > > > > > >>>> current > > > > > >>>>>> version > > > > > >>>>>>> no > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> matter > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> in > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> what > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right now. I know that we have > > > > > >>>>> probably > > > > > >>>>>>> unfinished > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> discussion > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core changes. I'm suggesting > > > > > >> leave > > > > > >>>> it > > > > > >>>>>> for the > > > > > >>>>>>> next > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release. I'm > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be release manager. I will > > > > > >>> study > > > > > >>>>>> carefully > > > > > >>>>>>> what > > > > > >>>>>>>> we > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> have > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> here > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to get help with all of the > > > > > >>>>> issues. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that we have failing > > > > > >>> typedefs > > > > > >>>> - > > > > > >>>>> I > > > > > >>>>>>> cleaned up > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> workspace and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. If #576 fail I will ask > > > > > >>> infra > > > > > >>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>> advice. [2] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do I need to know anything in > > > > > >> case > > > > > >>>> of > > > > > >>>>>> release > > > > > >>>>>>> Royale > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> npm ? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your last > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion here [3] is still up > > > > > >> ? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about emulation branch - > > > > > >> Can > > > > > >>> I > > > > > >>>>>> merge it > > > > > >>>>>>> into > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> develop ? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything what can hold > > > > > >>> that > > > > > >>>>>> release ? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0> -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
