Hi Carlos, Question to one of your class. Why are you doing two times removing [1] and couple of lines later you are doing removeElement ? It shouldn't event work because there is no method removeElement in that interface.
[1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/62265d52abdf34f797dc7582841ed029d8fb0cff/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/beads/itemRenderers/RemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData.as#L131 Thanks, Piotr pt., 31 sie 2018 o 12:18 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > That change should be reverted. I added it to try and fix an issue with > Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic columns. > > > On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Harbs, > > > > Some time ago you have added interface IDataGridColumnList [1]. It is > used > > here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment > > > > list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer; > > > > But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property and build is > > failing - locally. How actually it is working ? > > > > [1] > > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as > < > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as > > > > [2] > > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 > < > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 > > > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto: > carlosrov...@apache.org>> napisał(a): > > > >> Piotr, > >> > >> for me its ok, but only want to point something important. I think we > all > >> invested many emails, hours in discussing about this. I think all > positions > >> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring to the plate are > new, > >> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that we all can get what > we > >> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel can't link basic, > so > >> it must create it's own versions. In case this could not be possible, > >> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating Jewel versions of > >> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and DropDownList show that I > was in > >> the right track, since the things I copied are modified for Jewel since > >> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In Basic there's too much > of > >> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and that means that this > >> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece of code that > could be > >> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs and CSS don't > want to > >> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will need to deal with > those > >> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code should help you to > put > >> the Pilars of other high level things without the need of looking how to > >> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in Basic code when > >> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things could be change in > >> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here things that Basic > is > >> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at least), can use > it. > >> And Jewel can't use. > >> > >> Don't see other way. > >> > >> Let's see this as we end this release. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Carlos > >> > >> > >> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) > >> escribió: > >> > >>> Hi Carlos, > >>> > >>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had enough problems with > >>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as is. > >>> > >>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of that stuff after > >>> release. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Piotr > >>> > >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert we said to do, so > >> when > >>> we > >>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more consistent. > >>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of DataGroup I can move it > >> from > >>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel. > >>>> Let me know if this is ok for you. > >>>> > >>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core to consider. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >>>> > >>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have that changes, but > >>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache to make it working. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of that. > >>>>> > >>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>> > >>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and merged it into the > >>>>>> integration branch. However, the Maven build in the integration > >>> branch > >>>>> is > >>>>>> still failing. It appears to be because DataGroup got moved from > >>> Basic > >>>>> to > >>>>>> Core. The Ant build should be failing there too. I was under the > >>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not going to be in this > >>>>>> release. Someone else will have to deal with resolving these > >> issues. > >>>> I > >>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them out. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > >>> > >>>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale then you can > >>> pull > >>>>>> those > >>>>>>> changes into the integration branch. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Carlos, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you know how to fix > >>>> that > >>>>> ? > >>>>>>> Probably I > >>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven complaining. :) > >>> If > >>>>> you > >>>>>> won't > >>>>>>> have > >>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira < > >>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I switched to the feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop > >>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the begining > >>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it > >>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): > >>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method numItemRenderers in > >>>> interface > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class DataGroup > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea > >>>>>> implements > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ^ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): > >>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in interface > >>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea > >>>>>> implements > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ^ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > *------------------------------------------------------------------------* > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:* > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent > >> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT > >>>> .... > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >>>>>>>> 2.164 s] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework > >>>> ........................... > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >>>>>>>> 0.273 s] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts > >>>> .................... > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >>>>>>>> 1.175 s] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs > >>>> ..................... > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >>>>>>>> 0.691 s] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core > >>>> ............... > >>>>>>> *FAILURE* [ > >>>>>>>> 1.947 s] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Binding > >>>> ............ > >>>>>>> *SKIPPED* > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was > >> compiling > >>>> and > >>>>>> tested > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are still > >>> unsolved. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale introduced > >> some > >>>> MX > >>>>>> API > >>>>>>> that is > >>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it needs to > >> add > >>>> it. > >>>>>> For now > >>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it reach Basic > >>>>> library > >>>>>> it > >>>>>>> could be > >>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did you try to > >>>>>> compile with > >>>>>>> maven > >>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. I'll > >> return > >>> to > >>>>> my > >>>>>> Jewel > >>>>>>> duties > >>>>>>>> in the meanwhile > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>>>> Carlos > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos Rovira (< > >>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>> ) > >>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and report if > >> I > >>>> find > >>>>>> some > >>>>>>> isuue. > >>>>>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next version > >> of > >>>>>> Royale. One > >>>>>>> of the > >>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in MXRoyale > >>>> branch > >>>>> to > >>>>>>> develop. I > >>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in MXRoyale > >>> and > >>>>>> develop > >>>>>>> now is > >>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch > >>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to develop I > >> would > >>>> like > >>>>>> to ask > >>>>>>> you to > >>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end - > >> whether I > >>>>>> didn't > >>>>>>> break any > >>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed - please > >> make > >>>>>> changes and > >>>>>>>> commit > >>>>>>>>>> to that branch. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and test some > >>>> Jewel > >>>>>>> examples ? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to see > >> what > >>> is > >>>>>> happen. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira < > >>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a integration > >>> branch, > >>>>>> moreover > >>>>>>> since > >>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way. Then > >>> solve > >>>>>>> conflicts in > >>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is > >> compiling > >>>> and > >>>>>> working > >>>>>>> fine > >>>>>>>> as > >>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the integration > >>>>> branch. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Carlos > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex Harui > >>>>>>>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid > >>>>>>>>>>> ) > >>>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root folders for > >>>>>> projects. I > >>>>>>> think > >>>>>>>>>> Agent > >>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and master > >> may > >>> be > >>>>>> running > >>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>> wherever > >>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing. In theory, royale-compiler > >>> and > >>>>>>> royale-typedefs > >>>>>>>>>>>> should be able to be built off master, and the > >>>> other > >>>>>> builds > >>>>>>> should > >>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>> able > >>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the results of > >>>> those > >>>>>>> builds. If > >>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>> want > >>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to the > >>> agent > >>>>>> that's > >>>>>>> fine as > >>>>>>>>>> well. > >>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would not > >> run > >>> on > >>>>>> master. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, > >>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1] [2] > >>>> It's > >>>>>>> pointing for > >>>>>>>>>> some > >>>>>>>>>>>> reason > >>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those one in > >>>>> Program > >>>>>>> Files. How > >>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>>> path > >>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is > >>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] ** > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>>>> *[2] > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,* > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Piotr* > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr Zarzycki < > >>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you > >> will > >>> be > >>>>>> done > >>>>>>> with all > >>>>>>>>>> your > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes! > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs < > >>>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with > >> ACE > >>>> on > >>>>>> multiple > >>>>>>>>>> machines. > >>>>>>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>>> was > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first > >>> running > >>>>>> ant on > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> typedefs > >>>>>>>>>>>> repo and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not > >>> really > >>>>>> sure what > >>>>>>>>>> triggered > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on > >>>>>>> apacheroyaleci? > >>>>>>>> Dunno… > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop > >>>>> branch > >>>>>> works > >>>>>>> for me > >>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>> fixing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next > >>>>> couple > >>>>>> of > >>>>>>> days. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be > >>>>>>> cherry-picked from > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui > >>>>>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this, > >>>> but I > >>>>>> can't > >>>>>>> find it > >>>>>>>>>> so I > >>>>>>>>>>>> guess > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the > >>> builds > >>>>>> began to > >>>>>>> fail > >>>>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci. The only way I was able > >> to > >>>> fix > >>>>>> it was > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> create a > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the > >>> screen > >>>>> (to > >>>>>> run > >>>>>>> tests) > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>> agent. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and > >>>> royale-typedefs > >>>>>> should > >>>>>>> still > >>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>> able > >>>>>>>>>>>> to use > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent. Any build issues > >>>> here > >>>>>> are > >>>>>>> probably a > >>>>>>>>>>>> matter of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place. > >>> I > >>>>>> think it > >>>>>>> did all > >>>>>>>>>> work > >>>>>>>>>>>> at one > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is > >>>> independent > >>>>>> of any > >>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have > >> a > >>>>> slight > >>>>>>> preference > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>> wait a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex > >>> working, > >>>>>> but if > >>>>>>> I'm not > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> RM > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the > >>>> merge > >>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me. I was > >>> also > >>>>>>> pondering just > >>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have switched two build on jenkins > >>> to > >>>>>> "master" > >>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs - It seems that this > >> fixes > >>>>>> issue with > >>>>>>>> build. - > >>>>>>>>>>> Not > >>>>>>>>>>>> sure > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay like that. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working right now to fix build > >> for > >>>>>> module > >>>>>>> Icons. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr > >>>> Zarzycki < > >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to > >>>>>> build.xml, if > >>>>>>> it won't > >>>>>>>>>> work > >>>>>>>>>>>> I will > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr > >>> Zarzycki < > >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing > >> build > >>>>> [1]. > >>>>>> It > >>>>>>>> complaining > >>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs > >>> does > >>>>> not > >>>>>>> exist" and > >>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>> would be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is > >>>> being > >>>>>> build > >>>>>>> to that > >>>>>>>>>>> folder > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files > >>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs". > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr > >>>> Zarzycki > >>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to notify Infra about > >>> problem > >>>>> with > >>>>>>> build on > >>>>>>>>>> b.a.o. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Locally > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is perfectly fine. I will > >>>>> attach > >>>>>> dev > >>>>>>> list and > >>>>>>>>>>> write > >>>>>>>>>>>> email > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org <mailto: > >>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org>. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos > >>> Rovira < > >>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Piotr!, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you said discussion is not over, > >>>> but I > >>>>>> think > >>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>>> discussed > >>>>>>>>>>>> almost > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things and plans was left for > >>> releases > >>>>>> "post > >>>>>>> 0.9.3". In > >>>>>>>>>>> fact I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package name changes that was the > >>> only > >>>>>> point > >>>>>>> that was > >>>>>>>>>> making > >>>>>>>>>>>> us not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this > >>> point > >>>>>> safe to > >>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3, > >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.4 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to call it :) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I'm this days > >> wanting > >>>> to > >>>>>> finish > >>>>>>> some > >>>>>>>>>> things > >>>>>>>>>>>> in Jewel > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will make it pretty usable in an > >>> stable > >>>>>> way, for > >>>>>>> me > >>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>> points are: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * End Jewel Table and Jewel List > >>> remove > >>>>> and > >>>>>>> update data > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel NumericStepper > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel DropdownList/Combobox > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's much more to do, but I > >> think > >>>>> those > >>>>>> three > >>>>>>> points > >>>>>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>>>>> make > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> many > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people have the minimun to start > >>>> working > >>>>>> in real > >>>>>>> Apache > >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale Jewel > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (at least is what I need to start a > >>>> real > >>>>>> project > >>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>> now > >>>>>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale, so I'm working hard to > >>> complete > >>>>>> these > >>>>>>> points). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to make this asap, so hope > >>>>>> something of > >>>>>>> those > >>>>>>>>>> point > >>>>>>>>>>>> could go > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release :) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35, > >>> Piotr > >>>>>> Zarzycki > >>>>>>> (< > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto: > >>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no objections to that. The > >>>>> question > >>>>>>> whether > >>>>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of view Maven which is I believe > >> big > >>>>> part > >>>>>> of > >>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>> process > >>>>>>>>>>>> won't > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complain. We will see. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for confirmation, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash > >>>>>> Muppirala < > >>>>>>>>>>>> bigosma...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, since 0.9.3 was already > >> pushed > >>>> out > >>>>>> via > >>>>>>> npm [1], > >>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>> would be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best if > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skip to 0.9.4 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM > >>> Piotr > >>>>>> Zarzycki > >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> <mailto: > >>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a while since last > >>> version > >>>>> of > >>>>>>> Royale was > >>>>>>>>>>>> released. I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to start process of releasing > >>>> current > >>>>>> version > >>>>>>> no > >>>>>>>>>> matter > >>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>> what > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right now. I know that we have > >>>>> probably > >>>>>>> unfinished > >>>>>>>>>>>> discussion > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core changes. I'm suggesting > >> leave > >>>> it > >>>>>> for the > >>>>>>> next > >>>>>>>>>>>> release. I'm > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be release manager. I will > >>> study > >>>>>> carefully > >>>>>>> what > >>>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>>> here > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to get help with all of the > >>>>> issues. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that we have failing > >>> typedefs > >>>> - > >>>>> I > >>>>>>> cleaned up > >>>>>>>>>>>> workspace and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. If #576 fail I will ask > >>> infra > >>>>> for > >>>>>>> advice. [2] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do I need to know anything in > >> case > >>>> of > >>>>>> release > >>>>>>> Royale > >>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>> npm ? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your last > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion here [3] is still up > >> ? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about emulation branch - > >> Can > >>> I > >>>>>> merge it > >>>>>>> into > >>>>>>>>>>> develop ? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything what can hold > >>> that > >>>>>> release ? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki < > https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki < > https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>>* > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
