Alex, Om, I'm a bit farther. I had a lot of problems on my sight with gpg, but I was able to configure it properly in GitBash. I reached point with artifacts upload. It's failed cause it looks like my password was incorrect. I would like to make sure that I'm having similar configuration as you.
I have login and password Maven in c:\Users\piotr\.m2\settings.xml under <servers> <server> <id>apache-release</id> <username>piotrz</username> <password>mypass</password> </server> <server> <id>apache-snapshots</id> <username>piotrz</username> <password>mypass</password> </server> </servers> I'm getting following results right now [1] -> compiler-build-tools-1.0.0. jar. Return code is: 401, ReasonPhrase: Unauthorized. It looks like I'm having problem with authorization to maven central. The question is also - Do you use apache login and password ? [1] https://paste.apache.org/5OOR Thanks, Piotr pt., 12 paź 2018 o 07:39 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > > Well, it depends. In looking at the repos, I do not see the 0.9.4 tag, > which is strange since Carlos's Git GUI client is updating it. > > IMO, for sure, you should update releasecandidate.xml per my earlier > email, delete the repos out of the folder you are using and see how far you > get. Maybe there is a bad tag I can't see that Maven will see and fail. > Not sure what to do in that case, maybe we'll have to give up on 0.9.4 as a > version and try to upgrade the version to 0.9.5. Or maybe the tag never > got pushed and deleting the repos locally will resolve the issue. > > Good luck, > -Alex > > On 10/11/18, 10:24 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Alex, > > In the other words If I have time today I can continue with the > process? We > end up with situation where I need to remove tag and try again as I > remember? > > Thanks, > Piotr > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, 7:12 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > Hi Piotr, > > > > I agree with your sentiments. However, I think one problem is that > the > > revert emails are misleading. Unlike other commits, the subject of a > > revert does not show what branch was changed, so I think Carlos was > > reverting things in a branch. > > > > That said, it is still very troublesome that his Git tools are > changing > > the tags. IMO, Carlos will have to stop using that tool. > > > > -Alex > > > > On 10/11/18, 9:57 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Carlos, > > > > You are expecting from people who are volunteers to do some > things in > > one > > day? It's impossible to do that. I'm not working on that full > time. I > > did > > first finally successful step for the release. Everything was > reported > > on > > this list. I had problems and didn't have time to resolve it. > Alex > > provide > > solution - next RM should pickup it and continue release. It can > take > > days. > > If you have problems you should create branch from the last > stable > > commit. > > Is it problem for you ? > > > > How can we now get back to the previous state now? > > > > Piotr > > > > pt., 12 paź 2018 o 02:09 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > > napisał(a): > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > if you check in actual develop for "0.9.5-SNAPSHOT" and > > "0.9.4-SNAPSHOT" > > > you'll see maven build compiler and typedefs 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT, > but > > when build > > > framework, it downloads compiler and typedefs 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT > since > > the > > > versions in framework are not updated. This is the reason you > don't > > see any > > > fail when building with maven. If you update all to use the > same > > number it > > > will fail. I recommend you as well to remove royale folder in > your > > local > > > .m2 to see how maven generates compiler and typedefs and then > > download > > > other version. > > > > > > Maybe the rest of people didn't see this because they use ANT > and > > that > > > build system is not affected by the release process. But I > think we > > can't > > > left the failed release process without revert it for days, > since we > > are > > > all seeing different things. > > > > > > For example, I was able to run your MX RO example with ANT, > but I > > can make > > > it work with Maven, what means to me that I still can't use it > since > > my > > > entire project is in maven. > > > > > > I'm trying to fix this for several hours now and still > couldn't test > > mx RO > > > nor working on my project... > > > > > > I'm closing for today with all messed up. Tomorrow will try > again, > > or will > > > need to block me in a branch to be able to continue working. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El vie., 12 oct. 2018 a las 1:53, Alex Harui > > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) > > > escribió: > > > > > > > The 0.9.4 release branch has been cut. I have not seen any > > problems > > > > reported against it, so I don't know of any reason to delete > it. > > Thus, > > > the > > > > develop branch should be at 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT. > > > > > > > > I noticed you messed around with the versions so I have no > idea > > what > > > state > > > > we are in, plus I continue to see that tags are being > updated. > > You will > > > > probably have to stop using your Git GUI. We cannot have > tags be > > > modified. > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/11/18, 3:14 PM, "Carlos Rovira" < > carlosrov...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm a bit confused with the actual state of the repo. We > > should stay > > > in > > > > 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT? or 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT? > > > > I'm building with the latest since 1-2 days but removed > all > > royale > > > > folder > > > > with all maven artifacts and rebuild from scratch, makes > me > > have > > > mixed > > > > versions, since some artifacts are downloading 0.9.4 > instead > > of use > > > > 0.9.5 > > > > > > > > Piotr, seems nobody take the request to continue with > the > > release > > > for > > > > now, > > > > so I propose to stabilize the repo. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El jue., 11 oct. 2018 a las 20:33, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately in the next couple of days I won't have > time > > for > > > that. > > > > If > > > > > someone can do that feel free jump into it. > > > > > > > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 6:43 PM Alex Harui > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > After digging through the output you pasted, it > appears > > that the > > > > > > "check-empty-folder" target isn't quite right and > didn't > > catch > > > > that you > > > > > > didn't run "maven" against an empty folder. > Although I am > > a bit > > > > puzzled > > > > > > why there were modified files in the working copy. > > > > > > > > > > > > Maven and the scripts have some expectation that you > are > > starting > > > > from > > > > > the > > > > > > beginning, so if Maven got far enough to create a > tag and > > you > > > have > > > > to > > > > > start > > > > > > over, you have to remove the tag. These scripts are > still > > under > > > > > > development so you should not expect that every > situation > > has > > > been > > > > > > accounted for. > > > > > > > > > > > > So, go delete the tag. Instructions for doing so > are in > > the > > > > wiki. Maybe > > > > > > figure out why those files were modified, but maybe > > because your > > > > earlier > > > > > > run didn't have the right gpg password. > > > > > > > > > > > > Try changing the check-empty-folder to also test for: > > > > > > > > > > > > <available > > file="${basedir}/royale-asjs/build.properties" > > > > > > type="file" > > > > > > property="found.build.properties" > value="true" > > /> > > > > > > > > > > > > Then it should catch you on the steps where you are > > supposed to > > > > start by > > > > > > pulling down the repos again. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you don't have time for any of that, let us know > here > > so the > > > > next RM > > > > > > can know where to start. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/11/18, 2:05 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I gave up again :) It costs me to much time. I > thought > > since > > > > Om did > > > > > so > > > > > > much > > > > > > progress I will launch the script and will work. > It's > > still > > > > failing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FWJ44&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C51e386cbf09c4782574908d63003074b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749186919575507&sdata=LD8lMIXS1ApkRl9XtxIdl9my4qODg2%2F2CBSrMZk8Cpk%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > I run first time and had problem with gpg > password - > > just > > > > forgot it, > > > > > > but > > > > > > run it again and type correct password. Probably > first > > time > > > > this tag > > > > > > was > > > > > > created and now script failing cause tag exits. > Never > > ending > > > > story. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm in that step - If someone would like to try > it out > > let me > > > > know > > > > > and > > > > > > I > > > > > > won't revert anything for now: > > > > > > > > > > > > ant -f releasecandidate.xml > -Drelease.version="0.9.4" > > > > > > -Dbrowser="c:\Program > > > > > > Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe" -Drc=1 maven > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > czw., 11 paź 2018 o 10:13 Piotr Zarzycki < > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is what I'm getting for git status for > > royale-compiler > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FYuiH&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C51e386cbf09c4782574908d63003074b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749186919575507&sdata=%2BFct%2F9O427FmUha4o450SxlZ65ip5jcoCUbentrjcHY%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > śr., 10 paź 2018 o 17:50 Alex Harui > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > > > > > > > > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> What does 'git status' return for that local > copy > > of the > > > > > > royale-compiler > > > > > > >> repo? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> That part of the script is trying to see if > > > > compiler-jburg-types > > > > > and > > > > > > >> compiler-build-tools needed a version update > that > > needs to > > > > be > > > > > > pushed. > > > > > > >> Those two projects should be at 1.0.0 since we > > rarely, if > > > > ever, > > > > > > will need > > > > > > >> to modify it. There shouldn't have been > > modifications in > > > > this > > > > > > release, yet > > > > > > >> Git status is reporting modifications to some > > file. A > > > test > > > > is > > > > > done > > > > > > to > > > > > > >> check for the word "modified:" in the 'git > status' > > output, > > > > then > > > > > that > > > > > > >> attempt to push is executed. Somehow, the git > > status is > > > > implying > > > > > > >> modifications but the files we are trying to > push > > are not > > > > > modified. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> The solutions should not require reverting of > the > > release > > > > branch. > > > > > > It > > > > > > >> looks like you have successfully created a > correct > > set of > > > > branches > > > > > > and the > > > > > > >> steps you are running start by pulling down > the > > release > > > > branch. I > > > > > > didn't > > > > > > >> see any commits to the release branch from the > > scripts, so > > > > to > > > > > > re-start, it > > > > > > >> should just be manually deleting the local > copies > > of the > > > > repos and > > > > > > running > > > > > > >> the Ant command again after making one of the > > changes to > > > > > > >> releasecandidate.xml I will describe below: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> IMO, the choices are (and there may be more > choices) > > > > > > >> 1. Figure out how to be smarter about what > 'git > > status' > > > > output > > > > > > will say > > > > > > >> so the test works correctly > > > > > > >> 2. Set failonerror="false" on the push step > and not > > care > > > if > > > > that > > > > > > push > > > > > > >> succeeds. This is slightly risky if we ever > do > > want to > > > push > > > > > > changes, but > > > > > > >> again, that is low probability, IMO. > > > > > > >> 3. Comment out those steps since it will be > rare we > > will > > > > need > > > > > > them. If > > > > > > >> we do need them some day, the RM will have to > > remember to > > > > > uncomment > > > > > > those > > > > > > >> steps. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> HTH, > > > > > > >> -Alex > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On 10/10/18, 2:52 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Ok It's failed :) However I passed step 3 > in > > > > instruction. Step > > > > > > 4 is > > > > > > >> failing > > > > > > >> [1] - if someone know what could it be - > I will > > wait > > > > with > > > > > > reverting > > > > > > >> changes. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Lines in stacktrace are pointing in ant > script > > to > > > > following > > > > > > targets: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Line 556: git-commit-and-push-utils > > > > > > >> Line 487: > git-commit-and-push-utils-if-modified > > > > > > >> Line 473: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> <exec executable="${git}" > dir="${compiler}" > > > > > failonerror="true" > > > > > > > >> <arg value="commit" /> > > > > > > >> <arg value="-m" /> > > > > > > >> <arg value="remove SNAPSHOT > from > > > > > > compiler-jburg-types and > > > > > > >> compiler-build-tools versions" /> > > > > > > >> </exec> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> [1] > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fbg5e&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C51e386cbf09c4782574908d63003074b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749186919575507&sdata=JeWQNA0OphSXXDh7EeT427LAD4vmMXFRYKCtYauNZJE%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > > > >> Piotr > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> śr., 10 paź 2018 o 11:34 Carlos Rovira < > > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> napisał(a): > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Ok Piotr, good luck! :) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > El mié., 10 oct. 2018 a las 10:34, Piotr > > Zarzycki (< > > > > > > >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > I will try right now process from my > PC. We > > will > > > > see how > > > > > > far I > > > > > > >> will go > > > > > > >> > with > > > > > > >> > > that. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Piotr > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > czw., 4 paź 2018 o 22:01 Alex Harui > > > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > > > > > >> > napisał(a): > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Hi Om, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > If make_branches succeeds, then you > > shouldn't > > > > need to go > > > > > > back > > > > > > >> and > > > > > > >> > delete > > > > > > >> > > > branches and tags and run > make_branches > > again if > > > > the > > > > > > "maven" > > > > > > >> step > > > > > > >> > fails. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > You might need to revert any > changes to > > the > > > > release > > > > > > branch that > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > >> > > > "maven" step did, but then you > should be > > able to > > > > delete > > > > > > the > > > > > > >> local copy > > > > > > >> > of > > > > > > >> > > > the branches and start again with > "maven" > > or > > > > > > >> > > > "maven_skip_compiler_and_typedefs" > if you > > got > > > all > > > > the > > > > > way > > > > > > up to > > > > > > >> > > royale-asjs. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > What are some of the 200+ files that > > don't get > > > > reverted > > > > > > back to > > > > > > >> 0.9.4? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > You are welcome to try to add the > > "continue" > > > > option. I > > > > > > would > > > > > > >> suggest > > > > > > >> > > > adding a dummy parameter. So if the > > script > > > > currently > > > > > > calls > > > > > > >> Maven like > > > > > > >> > > this: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > <exec executable="${mvn}" > > > > > > >> dir="${basedir}/maven-release-plugin" > > > > > > >> > > > failonerror="true" > > > > > > > >> > > > <arg value="clean" /> > > > > > > >> > > > <arg value="install" /> > > > > > > >> > > > </exec> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > You can try changing it to > something like > > this: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > <property > name="continueOption" > > > > > value="-Ddummy=0" > > > > > > /> > > > > > > >> > > > <exec executable="${mvn}" > > > > > > >> dir="${basedir}/maven-release-plugin" > > > > > > >> > > > failonerror="true" > > > > > > > >> > > > <arg > > value="${continueOption}" /> > > > > > > >> > > > <arg value="clean" /> > > > > > > >> > > > <arg value="install" /> > > > > > > >> > > > </exec> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Then you should be able to set in > your > > > > local.properties: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > continueOption=-rf JewelExample > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > You will probably need to use > different > > names > > > for > > > > each > > > > > > call to > > > > > > >> Maven so > > > > > > >> > > > subsequent Maven calls don't pick > up the > > same > > > > option. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > HTH, > > > > > > >> > > > -Alex > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On 10/4/18, 11:58 AM, "OmPrakash > > Muppirala" < > > > > > > >> bigosma...@gmail.com> > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:48 AM > Alex > > Harui > > > > > > >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Om, it looks like you are > still > > deleting > > > and > > > > > > recreating > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > >> > > branches. > > > > > > >> > > > > Does this mean you have never > > completed > > > the > > > > > > make_branches > > > > > > >> step? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Yes, I delete the tags, branches > > (remote) > > > > each time > > > > > > >> something > > > > > > >> > fails. > > > > > > >> > > > Then > > > > > > >> > > > I do a global search for 0.9.5 > and > > replace > > > it > > > > with > > > > > > 0.9.4 > > > > > > >> (some 200+ > > > > > > >> > > > files > > > > > > >> > > > across 3 repos), then push them > into > > > > remote/develop. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Then I do the make_branches step > > first. > > > Then > > > > do a > > > > > > git push > > > > > > >> in > > > > > > >> > > > roayale-asjs > > > > > > >> > > > as per the instructions in the > > commandline. > > > I > > > > have > > > > > > never > > > > > > >> had issues > > > > > > >> > > > with > > > > > > >> > > > this step. It is always the > maven > > step that > > > > fails > > > > > > for some > > > > > > >> reason > > > > > > >> > or > > > > > > >> > > > the > > > > > > >> > > > other. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Is make_branches failing > trying to > > run a > > > > build in > > > > > > the > > > > > > >> develop > > > > > > >> > > branch > > > > > > >> > > > and > > > > > > >> > > > > uploading 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT > artifacts? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > No > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I supposed we could try to > find a > > way to > > > > skip > > > > > that, > > > > > > but > > > > > > >> you will > > > > > > >> > > need > > > > > > >> > > > > reliable uploading to > > repository.a.o to be > > > > an RM > > > > > > without > > > > > > >> going > > > > > > >> > > crazy. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Hmm, I use the same internet > > connection for > > > > personal > > > > > > and > > > > > > >> work > > > > > > >> > related > > > > > > >> > > > activities. I don't usually > have > > issues > > > with > > > > > > internet. > > > > > > >> Either we > > > > > > >> > > are > > > > > > >> > > > very > > > > > > >> > > > unlucky here or we need a more > > reselient way > > > > to pick > > > > > > up > > > > > > >> things if > > > > > > >> > we > > > > > > >> > > > lose > > > > > > >> > > > internet connectivity > momentarily. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > It takes upwards of 90 minutes > of > > uploading > > > > stuff. I > > > > > > dont > > > > > > >> do this > > > > > > >> > > kind > > > > > > >> > > > of > > > > > > >> > > > uploading for my regular work, > so > > that is > > > > probably I > > > > > > have > > > > > > >> never hit > > > > > > >> > > > this > > > > > > >> > > > issue before. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I still think that looking into > the > > > > 'resume-from' > > > > > > directive > > > > > > >> in > > > > > > >> > maven > > > > > > >> > > is > > > > > > >> > > > worthwhile. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > > > > > >> > > > Om > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > -Alex > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On 10/3/18, 2:11 PM, > "OmPrakash > > > Muppirala" < > > > > > > >> bigosma...@gmail.com > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at > 2:02 PM > > Alex > > > > Harui > > > > > > >> > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Om, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Does anything deploy, > or is > > that the > > > > first > > > > > > thing > > > > > > >> that is > > > > > > >> > > > attempted to > > > > > > >> > > > > > deploy? I found this > article > > that > > > > might > > > > > help: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.apigee.com%2Fquestions%2F50756%2Funable-to-deploy-using-maven-script-due-to-error-r.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C51e386cbf09c4782574908d63003074b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749186919575507&sdata=wNctwU8V5HRTfTnDGsmn7Xs22H%2BDKZqUV1Meq516VQI%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > It deployed a lot of > artifacts > > before > > > > hitting > > > > > > this > > > > > > >> error. I > > > > > > >> > > > don't see > > > > > > >> > > > > anything special with this > > artifact. > > > > So, I am > > > > > > >> guessing that > > > > > > >> > it > > > > > > >> > > > was a > > > > > > >> > > > > momentary bad connection > that > > caused > > > > this. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I would be concerned > about > > > restarting > > > > from > > > > > the > > > > > > >> middle of a > > > > > > >> > > > Maven > > > > > > >> > > > > call. I > > > > > > >> > > > > > suppose you could try > it, but > > what > > > if > > > > it > > > > > > skipped an > > > > > > >> > artifact? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > The maven error message > > explicitly > > > says > > > > this: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > [exec] [INFO] > [ERROR] After > > > > correcting > > > > > the > > > > > > >> problems, you > > > > > > >> > > can > > > > > > >> > > > > resume > > > > > > >> > > > > the build with the command > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > [exec] [INFO] > [ERROR] mvn > > > > <goals> -rf > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > :Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sunflower-Theme > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > There should be Ant > targets > > for > > > > starting > > > > > only > > > > > > on > > > > > > >> > royale-asjs > > > > > > >> > > if > > > > > > >> > > > > > royale-compiler and > > royale=typedefs > > > > worked > > > > > ok. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > >> > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 10/3/18, 11:58 AM, > > "OmPrakash > > > > Muppirala" > > > > > < > > > > > > >> > > > bigosma...@gmail.com> > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Another suggestion > I have > > is - > > > > can we do > > > > > > all > > > > > > >> the pushes > > > > > > >> > > to > > > > > > >> > > > > remote after > > > > > > >> > > > > > everything is done > > locally? > > > That > > > > way, > > > > > if > > > > > > >> something > > > > > > >> > goes > > > > > > >> > > > wrong > > > > > > >> > > > > > halfway, we > > > > > > >> > > > > > can just delete the > > royale-* > > > dirs > > > > > locally > > > > > > and > > > > > > >> rerun the > > > > > > >> > > > > > releasecandiate ant > > > > > > >> > > > > > script? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Not sure if this is > an > > easy > > > > change? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > >> > > > > > Om > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 > at > > 11:42 AM > > > > > OmPrakash > > > > > > >> Muppirala < > > > > > > >> > > > > > bigosma...@gmail.com> > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Okay, I tried a > couple > > of > > > times > > > > and I > > > > > > have > > > > > > >> started > > > > > > >> > > > getting > > > > > > >> > > > > `SSL peer > > > > > > >> > > > > > shut > > > > > > >> > > > > > > down incorrectly > errors` > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO] > > [INFO] > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO] > > [INFO] > > > BUILD > > > > > FAILURE > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO] > > [INFO] > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO] > > [INFO] > > > Total > > > > time: > > > > > > 16:04 > > > > > > >> min > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO] > > [INFO] > > > > Finished at: > > > > > > >> > > > > 2018-10-03T11:38:49-07:00 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO] > > [INFO] > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
