Unfortunately I got the same result as OM :( Something is really wrong with Maven central, cause I can't believe that we all have bad internet connection. :)
https://paste.apache.org/eqN9 Piotr pt., 12 paź 2018 o 19:14 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > The weirdest thing is that I cannot use anymore sourcetree after that > update. I'm getting wrong password and user name on other repositories > which are private. > > git version 2.19.1.windows.1 > > However after update I was able to continue process of release. Update > fixes for me some problems with gpg. > > Piotr > > pt., 12 paź 2018 o 18:47 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> napisał(a): > >> I was able to delete the tag. What version of Git are you using? I'm >> concerned other problems may arise. >> >> If you run into a problem like this again, you might want to try just >> giving up on rc1 and calling it rc2 so the tag names don't conflict. >> >> HTH, >> -Alex >> >> On 10/12/18, 9:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I would like to ask also someone for delete >> tag org.apache.royale.compiler-0.9.4-rc1 - I'm not sure what has >> happened >> but after updating git I cannot do that. I can commit stuff, but doing >> delete tag I'm getting >> >> remote: Permission to apache/royale-compiler.git denied to >> piotrzarzycki21. >> fatal: unable to access ' >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-compiler.git%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C07dbe5901e2d4ce7029e08d63061b209%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749593496378092&sdata=CXp64oo2O8qMuwV%2BXE14krbu71gQ7sWa1fIbuscajMA%3D&reserved=0 >> ': >> The requested URL returned error: 403 >> >> If someone do this for me I can try release process again. >> >> Thanks, >> Piotr >> >> pt., 12 paź 2018 o 18:20 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> napisał(a): >> >> > I was too focused on the credentials and didn't notice that your >> settings >> > didn't have HTTPS. >> > >> > <server> >> > <id>apache.releases.https</id> >> > <username>aharui</username> >> > <password>...</password> >> > </server> >> > <server> >> > <id>apache.snapshots.https</id> >> > <username>aharui</username> >> > <password>...</password> >> > </server> >> > >> > HTH, >> > -Alex >> > >> > On 10/12/18, 9:13 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > I logged in without the problem. Om was on the stage where he >> was able >> > to >> > upload something. I hope he will respond. Maybe he had some >> special >> > settings in file. >> > >> > Piotr >> > >> > pt., 12 paź 2018 o 17:55 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> > napisał(a): >> > >> > > Hi Piotr, >> > > >> > > Yes, I have the same settings (username aharui, password is >> my apache >> > > password). Try logging into repository.apache.org from your >> > browser. I >> > > don't know for sure that repository.a.o uses LDAP, it might >> be I >> > just used >> > > the same username and password to be lazy). >> > > >> > > I will also say that Infra recently changed some setting on >> > repository.a.o >> > > and I have not tried deploying since so maybe there is some >> > authorization >> > > step we need to do. >> > > >> > > HTH, >> > > -Alex >> > > >> > > On 10/12/18, 1:40 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > Alex, Om, >> > > >> > > I'm a bit farther. I had a lot of problems on my sight >> with gpg, >> > but I >> > > was >> > > able to configure it properly in GitBash. I reached point >> with >> > > artifacts >> > > upload. It's failed cause it looks like my password was >> > incorrect. I >> > > would >> > > like to make sure that I'm having similar configuration >> as you. >> > > >> > > I have login and password Maven in >> > c:\Users\piotr\.m2\settings.xml >> > > under >> > > >> > > <servers> >> > > <server> >> > > <id>apache-release</id> >> > > <username>piotrz</username> >> > > <password>mypass</password> >> > > </server> >> > > <server> >> > > <id>apache-snapshots</id> >> > > <username>piotrz</username> >> > > <password>mypass</password> >> > > </server> >> > > </servers> >> > > >> > > I'm getting following results right now [1] -> >> > > compiler-build-tools-1.0.0. >> > > jar. Return code is: 401, ReasonPhrase: Unauthorized. >> > > It looks like I'm having problem with authorization to >> maven >> > central. >> > > >> > > The question is also - Do you use apache login and >> password ? >> > > >> > > [1] >> > > >> > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F5OOR&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C07dbe5901e2d4ce7029e08d63061b209%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749593496378092&sdata=tUV%2B3KLFgLlLcuCbPegsTa3iUsckEFyohfp898zMOis%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Piotr >> > > >> > > pt., 12 paź 2018 o 07:39 Alex Harui >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> > > napisał(a): >> > > >> > > > Hi Piotr, >> > > > >> > > > Well, it depends. In looking at the repos, I do not >> see the >> > 0.9.4 >> > > tag, >> > > > which is strange since Carlos's Git GUI client is >> updating it. >> > > > >> > > > IMO, for sure, you should update releasecandidate.xml >> per my >> > earlier >> > > > email, delete the repos out of the folder you are using >> and >> > see how >> > > far you >> > > > get. Maybe there is a bad tag I can't see that Maven >> will see >> > and >> > > fail. >> > > > Not sure what to do in that case, maybe we'll have to >> give up >> > on >> > > 0.9.4 as a >> > > > version and try to upgrade the version to 0.9.5. Or >> maybe the >> > tag >> > > never >> > > > got pushed and deleting the repos locally will resolve >> the >> > issue. >> > > > >> > > > Good luck, >> > > > -Alex >> > > > >> > > > On 10/11/18, 10:24 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Alex, >> > > > >> > > > In the other words If I have time today I can >> continue >> > with the >> > > > process? We >> > > > end up with situation where I need to remove tag >> and try >> > again >> > > as I >> > > > remember? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Piotr >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, 7:12 AM Alex Harui >> > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi Piotr, >> > > > > >> > > > > I agree with your sentiments. However, I think >> one >> > problem is >> > > that >> > > > the >> > > > > revert emails are misleading. Unlike other >> commits, the >> > > subject of a >> > > > > revert does not show what branch was changed, so >> I think >> > > Carlos was >> > > > > reverting things in a branch. >> > > > > >> > > > > That said, it is still very troublesome that his >> Git >> > tools are >> > > > changing >> > > > > the tags. IMO, Carlos will have to stop using >> that tool. >> > > > > >> > > > > -Alex >> > > > > >> > > > > On 10/11/18, 9:57 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Carlos, >> > > > > >> > > > > You are expecting from people who are >> volunteers to >> > do some >> > > > things in >> > > > > one >> > > > > day? It's impossible to do that. I'm not >> working on >> > that >> > > full >> > > > time. I >> > > > > did >> > > > > first finally successful step for the release. >> > Everything >> > > was >> > > > reported >> > > > > on >> > > > > this list. I had problems and didn't have >> time to >> > resolve >> > > it. >> > > > Alex >> > > > > provide >> > > > > solution - next RM should pickup it and >> continue >> > release. >> > > It can >> > > > take >> > > > > days. >> > > > > If you have problems you should create branch >> from >> > the last >> > > > stable >> > > > > commit. >> > > > > Is it problem for you ? >> > > > > >> > > > > How can we now get back to the previous state >> now? >> > > > > >> > > > > Piotr >> > > > > >> > > > > pt., 12 paź 2018 o 02:09 Carlos Rovira < >> > > carlosrov...@apache.org> >> > > > > napisał(a): >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Alex, >> > > > > > if you check in actual develop for >> > "0.9.5-SNAPSHOT" and >> > > > > "0.9.4-SNAPSHOT" >> > > > > > you'll see maven build compiler and typedefs >> > > 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT, >> > > > but >> > > > > when build >> > > > > > framework, it downloads compiler and >> typedefs >> > > 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT >> > > > since >> > > > > the >> > > > > > versions in framework are not updated. This >> is the >> > > reason you >> > > > don't >> > > > > see any >> > > > > > fail when building with maven. If you >> update all >> > to use >> > > the >> > > > same >> > > > > number it >> > > > > > will fail. I recommend you as well to >> remove royale >> > > folder in >> > > > your >> > > > > local >> > > > > > .m2 to see how maven generates compiler and >> > typedefs and >> > > then >> > > > > download >> > > > > > other version. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Maybe the rest of people didn't see this >> because >> > they >> > > use ANT >> > > > and >> > > > > that >> > > > > > build system is not affected by the release >> > process. But >> > > I >> > > > think we >> > > > > can't >> > > > > > left the failed release process without >> revert it >> > for >> > > days, >> > > > since we >> > > > > are >> > > > > > all seeing different things. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > For example, I was able to run your MX RO >> example >> > with >> > > ANT, >> > > > but I >> > > > > can make >> > > > > > it work with Maven, what means to me that I >> still >> > can't >> > > use it >> > > > since >> > > > > my >> > > > > > entire project is in maven. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm trying to fix this for several hours >> now and >> > still >> > > > couldn't test >> > > > > mx RO >> > > > > > nor working on my project... >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm closing for today with all messed up. >> Tomorrow >> > will >> > > try >> > > > again, >> > > > > or will >> > > > > > need to block me in a branch to be able to >> continue >> > > working. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Carlos >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > El vie., 12 oct. 2018 a las 1:53, Alex Harui >> > > > > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) >> > > > > > escribió: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > The 0.9.4 release branch has been cut. I >> have >> > not >> > > seen any >> > > > > problems >> > > > > > > reported against it, so I don't know of >> any >> > reason to >> > > delete >> > > > it. >> > > > > Thus, >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > develop branch should be at >> 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I noticed you messed around with the >> versions so >> > I >> > > have no >> > > > idea >> > > > > what >> > > > > > state >> > > > > > > we are in, plus I continue to see that >> tags are >> > being >> > > > updated. >> > > > > You will >> > > > > > > probably have to stop using your Git >> GUI. We >> > cannot >> > > have >> > > > tags be >> > > > > > modified. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -Alex >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 10/11/18, 3:14 PM, "Carlos Rovira" < >> > > > carlosrov...@apache.org> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I'm a bit confused with the actual >> state of >> > the >> > > repo. We >> > > > > should stay >> > > > > > in >> > > > > > > 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT? or 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT? >> > > > > > > I'm building with the latest since >> 1-2 days >> > but >> > > removed >> > > > all >> > > > > royale >> > > > > > > folder >> > > > > > > with all maven artifacts and rebuild >> from >> > scratch, >> > > makes >> > > > me >> > > > > have >> > > > > > mixed >> > > > > > > versions, since some artifacts are >> > downloading >> > > 0.9.4 >> > > > instead >> > > > > of use >> > > > > > > 0.9.5 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Piotr, seems nobody take the request >> to >> > continue >> > > with >> > > > the >> > > > > release >> > > > > > for >> > > > > > > now, >> > > > > > > so I propose to stabilize the repo. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thoughts? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Carlos >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > El jue., 11 oct. 2018 a las 20:33, >> Piotr >> > Zarzycki >> > > (< >> > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Alex, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Unfortunately in the next couple of >> days I >> > won't >> > > have >> > > > time >> > > > > for >> > > > > > that. >> > > > > > > If >> > > > > > > > someone can do that feel free jump >> into it. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Piotr >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 6:43 PM Alex >> Harui >> > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > After digging through the output >> you >> > pasted, it >> > > > appears >> > > > > that the >> > > > > > > > > "check-empty-folder" target isn't >> quite >> > right >> > > and >> > > > didn't >> > > > > catch >> > > > > > > that you >> > > > > > > > > didn't run "maven" against an >> empty >> > folder. >> > > > Although I am >> > > > > a bit >> > > > > > > puzzled >> > > > > > > > > why there were modified files in >> the >> > working >> > > copy. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Maven and the scripts have some >> > expectation >> > > that you >> > > > are >> > > > > starting >> > > > > > > from >> > > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > beginning, so if Maven got far >> enough to >> > > create a >> > > > tag and >> > > > > you >> > > > > > have >> > > > > > > to >> > > > > > > > start >> > > > > > > > > over, you have to remove the >> tag. These >> > > scripts are >> > > > still >> > > > > under >> > > > > > > > > development so you should not >> expect >> > that every >> > > > situation >> > > > > has >> > > > > > been >> > > > > > > > > accounted for. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > So, go delete the tag. >> Instructions for >> > doing >> > > so >> > > > are in >> > > > > the >> > > > > > > wiki. Maybe >> > > > > > > > > figure out why those files were >> > modified, but >> > > maybe >> > > > > because your >> > > > > > > earlier >> > > > > > > > > run didn't have the right gpg >> password. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Try changing the >> check-empty-folder to >> > also >> > > test for: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > <available >> > > > > file="${basedir}/royale-asjs/build.properties" >> > > > > > > > > type="file" >> > > > > > > > > >> > property="found.build.properties" >> > > > value="true" >> > > > > /> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Then it should catch you on the >> steps >> > where >> > > you are >> > > > > supposed to >> > > > > > > start by >> > > > > > > > > pulling down the repos again. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > If you don't have time for any of >> that, >> > let us >> > > know >> > > > here >> > > > > so the >> > > > > > > next RM >> > > > > > > > > can know where to start. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -Alex >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On 10/11/18, 2:05 AM, "Piotr >> Zarzycki" < >> > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I gave up again :) It costs >> me to >> > much >> > > time. I >> > > > thought >> > > > > since >> > > > > > > Om did >> > > > > > > > so >> > > > > > > > > much >> > > > > > > > > progress I will launch the >> script >> > and will >> > > work. >> > > > It's >> > > > > still >> > > > > > > failing. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FWJ44&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C07dbe5901e2d4ce7029e08d63061b209%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749593496378092&sdata=S5WpJNtjoQD2p%2B5eZRuZlxgfAVjWf20Yf0tdYltE78o%3D&reserved=0 >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I run first time and had >> problem >> > with gpg >> > > > password - >> > > > > just >> > > > > > > forgot it, >> > > > > > > > > but >> > > > > > > > > run it again and type correct >> > password. >> > > Probably >> > > > first >> > > > > time >> > > > > > > this tag >> > > > > > > > > was >> > > > > > > > > created and now script >> failing cause >> > tag >> > > exits. >> > > > Never >> > > > > ending >> > > > > > > story. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I'm in that step - If someone >> would >> > like >> > > to try >> > > > it out >> > > > > let me >> > > > > > > know >> > > > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > > I >> > > > > > > > > won't revert anything for now: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ant -f releasecandidate.xml >> > > > -Drelease.version="0.9.4" >> > > > > > > > > -Dbrowser="c:\Program >> > > > > > > > > Files\Mozilla >> Firefox\firefox.exe" >> > -Drc=1 >> > > maven >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > Piotr >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > czw., 11 paź 2018 o 10:13 >> Piotr >> > Zarzycki < >> > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > > > napisał(a): >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > This is what I'm getting >> for git >> > status >> > > for >> > > > > royale-compiler >> > > > > > > [1] >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > [1] >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FYuiH&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C07dbe5901e2d4ce7029e08d63061b209%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749593496378092&sdata=JjrhMROWRzdfQD6GYn98l7FK%2FWD6n5%2Fyghl4e6dUB10%3D&reserved=0 >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > > Piotr >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > śr., 10 paź 2018 o 17:50 >> Alex Harui >> > > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > napisał(a): >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> What does 'git status' >> return for >> > that >> > > local >> > > > copy >> > > > > of the >> > > > > > > > > royale-compiler >> > > > > > > > > >> repo? >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> That part of the script is >> trying >> > to >> > > see if >> > > > > > > compiler-jburg-types >> > > > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > > >> compiler-build-tools >> needed a >> > version >> > > update >> > > > that >> > > > > needs to >> > > > > > > be >> > > > > > > > > pushed. >> > > > > > > > > >> Those two projects should >> be at >> > 1.0.0 >> > > since we >> > > > > rarely, if >> > > > > > > ever, >> > > > > > > > > will need >> > > > > > > > > >> to modify it. There >> shouldn't >> > have been >> > > > > modifications in >> > > > > > > this >> > > > > > > > > release, yet >> > > > > > > > > >> Git status is reporting >> > modifications >> > > to some >> > > > > file. A >> > > > > > test >> > > > > > > is >> > > > > > > > done >> > > > > > > > > to >> > > > > > > > > >> check for the word >> "modified:" in >> > the >> > > 'git >> > > > status' >> > > > > output, >> > > > > > > then >> > > > > > > > that >> > > > > > > > > >> attempt to push is >> executed. >> > Somehow, >> > > the git >> > > > > status is >> > > > > > > implying >> > > > > > > > > >> modifications but the >> files we are >> > > trying to >> > > > push >> > > > > are not >> > > > > > > > modified. >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> The solutions should not >> require >> > > reverting of >> > > > the >> > > > > release >> > > > > > > branch. >> > > > > > > > > It >> > > > > > > > > >> looks like you have >> successfully >> > > created a >> > > > correct >> > > > > set of >> > > > > > > branches >> > > > > > > > > and the >> > > > > > > > > >> steps you are running >> start by >> > pulling >> > > down >> > > > the >> > > > > release >> > > > > > > branch. I >> > > > > > > > > didn't >> > > > > > > > > >> see any commits to the >> release >> > branch >> > > from the >> > > > > scripts, so >> > > > > > > to >> > > > > > > > > re-start, it >> > > > > > > > > >> should just be manually >> deleting >> > the >> > > local >> > > > copies >> > > > > of the >> > > > > > > repos and >> > > > > > > > > running >> > > > > > > > > >> the Ant command again after >> > making one >> > > of the >> > > > > changes to >> > > > > > > > > >> releasecandidate.xml I will >> > describe >> > > below: >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> IMO, the choices are (and >> there >> > may be >> > > more >> > > > choices) >> > > > > > > > > >> 1. Figure out how to be >> smarter >> > about >> > > what >> > > > 'git >> > > > > status' >> > > > > > > output >> > > > > > > > > will say >> > > > > > > > > >> so the test works correctly >> > > > > > > > > >> 2. Set failonerror="false" >> on the >> > push >> > > step >> > > > and not >> > > > > care >> > > > > > if >> > > > > > > that >> > > > > > > > > push >> > > > > > > > > >> succeeds. This is >> slightly risky >> > if we >> > > ever >> > > > do >> > > > > want to >> > > > > > push >> > > > > > > > > changes, but >> > > > > > > > > >> again, that is low >> probability, >> > IMO. >> > > > > > > > > >> 3. Comment out those steps >> since >> > it >> > > will be >> > > > rare we >> > > > > will >> > > > > > > need >> > > > > > > > > them. If >> > > > > > > > > >> we do need them some day, >> the RM >> > will >> > > have to >> > > > > remember to >> > > > > > > > uncomment >> > > > > > > > > those >> > > > > > > > > >> steps. >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> HTH, >> > > > > > > > > >> -Alex >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> On 10/10/18, 2:52 AM, >> "Piotr >> > Zarzycki" < >> > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> Ok It's failed :) >> However I >> > passed >> > > step 3 >> > > > in >> > > > > > > instruction. Step >> > > > > > > > > 4 is >> > > > > > > > > >> failing >> > > > > > > > > >> [1] - if someone know >> what >> > could it >> > > be - >> > > > I will >> > > > > wait >> > > > > > > with >> > > > > > > > > reverting >> > > > > > > > > >> changes. >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> Lines in stacktrace are >> > pointing in >> > > ant >> > > > script >> > > > > to >> > > > > > > following >> > > > > > > > > targets: >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> Line 556: >> > git-commit-and-push-utils >> > > > > > > > > >> Line 487: >> > > > git-commit-and-push-utils-if-modified >> > > > > > > > > >> Line 473: >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> <exec >> executable="${git}" >> > > > dir="${compiler}" >> > > > > > > > failonerror="true" > >> > > > > > > > > >> <arg >> > value="commit" /> >> > > > > > > > > >> <arg >> value="-m" /> >> > > > > > > > > >> <arg >> value="remove >> > > SNAPSHOT >> > > > from >> > > > > > > > > compiler-jburg-types and >> > > > > > > > > >> compiler-build-tools >> > versions" /> >> > > > > > > > > >> </exec> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> [1] >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fbg5e&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C07dbe5901e2d4ce7029e08d63061b209%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749593496378092&sdata=wPbQdj%2BP5duPo9YQNx4VJzOJilNCpoMvjbkAc54Qj7Y%3D&reserved=0 >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > >> Piotr >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> śr., 10 paź 2018 o >> 11:34 >> > Carlos >> > > Rovira < >> > > > > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> napisał(a): >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > Ok Piotr, good luck! >> :) >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > El mié., 10 oct. >> 2018 a las >> > > 10:34, Piotr >> > > > > Zarzycki (< >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) >> > > escribió: >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Hi Guys, >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > I will try right >> now >> > process >> > > from my >> > > > PC. We >> > > > > will >> > > > > > > see how >> > > > > > > > > far I >> > > > > > > > > >> will go >> > > > > > > > > >> > with >> > > > > > > > > >> > > that. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Piotr >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > czw., 4 paź 2018 o >> 22:01 >> > Alex >> > > Harui >> > > > > > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> > > > > > > > > >> > napisał(a): >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Hi Om, >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > If make_branches >> > succeeds, >> > > then you >> > > > > shouldn't >> > > > > > > need to go >> > > > > > > > > back >> > > > > > > > > >> and >> > > > > > > > > >> > delete >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > branches and >> tags and >> > run >> > > > make_branches >> > > > > again if >> > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > "maven" >> > > > > > > > > >> step >> > > > > > > > > >> > fails. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
