I was too focused on the credentials and didn't notice that your settings 
didn't have HTTPS.

        <server>
            <id>apache.releases.https</id>
            <username>aharui</username>
            <password>...</password>
        </server>
        <server>
            <id>apache.snapshots.https</id>
            <username>aharui</username>
            <password>...</password>
        </server>

HTH,
-Alex

On 10/12/18, 9:13 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:

    I logged in without the problem. Om was on the stage where he was able to
    upload something. I hope he will respond. Maybe he had some special
    settings in file.
    
    Piotr
    
    pt., 12 paź 2018 o 17:55 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> napisał(a):
    
    > Hi Piotr,
    >
    > Yes, I have the same settings (username aharui, password is my apache
    > password).  Try logging into repository.apache.org from your browser.  I
    > don't know for sure that repository.a.o uses LDAP, it might be I just used
    > the same username and password to be lazy).
    >
    > I will also say that Infra recently changed some setting on repository.a.o
    > and I have not tried deploying since so maybe there is some authorization
    > step we need to do.
    >
    > HTH,
    > -Alex
    >
    > On 10/12/18, 1:40 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >     Alex, Om,
    >
    >     I'm a bit farther. I had a lot of problems on my sight with gpg, but I
    > was
    >     able to configure it properly in GitBash. I reached point with
    > artifacts
    >     upload. It's failed cause it looks like my password was incorrect. I
    > would
    >     like to make sure that I'm having similar configuration as you.
    >
    >     I have login and password Maven in c:\Users\piotr\.m2\settings.xml
    > under
    >
    >     <servers>
    >       <server>
    >     <id>apache-release</id>
    >     <username>piotrz</username>
    >     <password>mypass</password>
    >       </server>
    >       <server>
    >     <id>apache-snapshots</id>
    >     <username>piotrz</username>
    >     <password>mypass</password>
    >       </server>
    >     </servers>
    >
    >     I'm getting following results right now [1] ->
    > compiler-build-tools-1.0.0.
    >     jar. Return code is: 401, ReasonPhrase: Unauthorized.
    >     It looks like I'm having problem with authorization to maven central.
    >
    >     The question is also - Do you use apache login and password ?
    >
    >     [1]
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F5OOR&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C286f0f0c521a4b56968e08d6305db32b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749576336826014&amp;sdata=nbZHb6tVDckGENUV84%2BGd%2F56LqHBfSZoDNf6e7yk84o%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >
    >     Thanks,
    >     Piotr
    >
    >     pt., 12 paź 2018 o 07:39 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    > napisał(a):
    >
    >     > Hi Piotr,
    >     >
    >     > Well, it depends.  In looking at the repos, I do not see the 0.9.4
    > tag,
    >     > which is strange since Carlos's Git GUI client is updating it.
    >     >
    >     > IMO, for sure, you should update releasecandidate.xml per my earlier
    >     > email, delete the repos out of the folder you are using and see how
    > far you
    >     > get.  Maybe there is a bad tag I can't see that Maven will see and
    > fail.
    >     > Not sure what to do in that case, maybe we'll have to give up on
    > 0.9.4 as a
    >     > version and try to upgrade the version to 0.9.5.  Or maybe the tag
    > never
    >     > got pushed and deleting the repos locally will resolve the issue.
    >     >
    >     > Good luck,
    >     > -Alex
    >     >
    >     > On 10/11/18, 10:24 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     > wrote:
    >     >
    >     >     Alex,
    >     >
    >     >     In the other words If I have time today I can continue with the
    >     > process? We
    >     >     end up with situation where I need to remove tag and try again
    > as I
    >     >     remember?
    >     >
    >     >     Thanks,
    >     >     Piotr
    >     >
    >     >     On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, 7:12 AM Alex Harui
    > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     > wrote:
    >     >
    >     >     > Hi Piotr,
    >     >     >
    >     >     > I agree with your sentiments.  However, I think one problem is
    > that
    >     > the
    >     >     > revert emails are misleading.  Unlike other commits, the
    > subject of a
    >     >     > revert does not show what branch was changed, so I think
    > Carlos was
    >     >     > reverting things in a branch.
    >     >     >
    >     >     > That said, it is still very troublesome that his Git tools are
    >     > changing
    >     >     > the tags.  IMO, Carlos will have to stop using that tool.
    >     >     >
    >     >     > -Alex
    >     >     >
    >     >     > On 10/11/18, 9:57 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
    > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     > wrote:
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     Carlos,
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     You are expecting from people who are volunteers to do 
some
    >     > things in
    >     >     > one
    >     >     >     day? It's impossible to do that. I'm not working on that
    > full
    >     > time. I
    >     >     > did
    >     >     >     first finally successful step for the release. Everything
    > was
    >     > reported
    >     >     > on
    >     >     >     this list. I had problems and didn't have time to resolve
    > it.
    >     > Alex
    >     >     > provide
    >     >     >     solution - next RM should pickup it and continue release.
    > It can
    >     > take
    >     >     > days.
    >     >     >     If you have problems you should create branch from the 
last
    >     > stable
    >     >     > commit.
    >     >     >     Is it problem for you ?
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     How can we now get back to the previous state now?
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     Piotr
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     pt., 12 paź 2018 o 02:09 Carlos Rovira <
    > carlosrov...@apache.org>
    >     >     > napisał(a):
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     > Hi Alex,
    >     >     >     > if you check in actual develop for "0.9.5-SNAPSHOT" and
    >     >     > "0.9.4-SNAPSHOT"
    >     >     >     > you'll see maven build compiler and typedefs
    > 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT,
    >     > but
    >     >     > when build
    >     >     >     > framework, it downloads compiler and typedefs
    > 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT
    >     > since
    >     >     > the
    >     >     >     > versions in framework are not updated. This is the
    > reason you
    >     > don't
    >     >     > see any
    >     >     >     > fail when building with maven. If you update all to use
    > the
    >     > same
    >     >     > number it
    >     >     >     > will fail. I recommend you as well to remove royale
    > folder in
    >     > your
    >     >     > local
    >     >     >     > .m2 to see how maven generates compiler and typedefs and
    > then
    >     >     > download
    >     >     >     > other version.
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     > Maybe the rest of people didn't see this because they
    > use ANT
    >     > and
    >     >     > that
    >     >     >     > build system is not affected by the release process. But
    > I
    >     > think we
    >     >     > can't
    >     >     >     > left the failed release process without revert it for
    > days,
    >     > since we
    >     >     > are
    >     >     >     > all seeing different things.
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     > For example, I was able to run your MX RO example with
    > ANT,
    >     > but I
    >     >     > can make
    >     >     >     > it work with Maven, what means to me that I still can't
    > use it
    >     > since
    >     >     > my
    >     >     >     > entire project is in maven.
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     > I'm trying to fix this for several hours now and still
    >     > couldn't test
    >     >     > mx RO
    >     >     >     > nor working on my project...
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     > I'm closing for today with all messed up. Tomorrow will
    > try
    >     > again,
    >     >     > or will
    >     >     >     > need to block me in a branch to be able to continue
    > working.
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     > Thanks
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     > Carlos
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     > El vie., 12 oct. 2018 a las 1:53, Alex Harui
    >     >     > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
    >     >     >     > escribió:
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     > > The 0.9.4 release branch has been cut.  I have not
    > seen any
    >     >     > problems
    >     >     >     > > reported against it, so I don't know of any reason to
    > delete
    >     > it.
    >     >     > Thus,
    >     >     >     > the
    >     >     >     > > develop branch should be at 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT.
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > > I noticed you messed around with the versions so I
    > have no
    >     > idea
    >     >     > what
    >     >     >     > state
    >     >     >     > > we are in, plus I continue to see that tags are being
    >     > updated.
    >     >     > You will
    >     >     >     > > probably have to stop using your Git GUI.  We cannot
    > have
    >     > tags be
    >     >     >     > modified.
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > > -Alex
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > > On 10/11/18, 3:14 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <
    >     > carlosrov...@apache.org>
    >     >     > wrote:
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     Hi,
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     I'm a bit confused with the actual state of the
    > repo. We
    >     >     > should stay
    >     >     >     > in
    >     >     >     > >     0.9.4-SNAPSHOT? or 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT?
    >     >     >     > >     I'm building with the latest since 1-2 days but
    > removed
    >     > all
    >     >     > royale
    >     >     >     > > folder
    >     >     >     > >     with all maven artifacts and rebuild from scratch,
    > makes
    >     > me
    >     >     > have
    >     >     >     > mixed
    >     >     >     > >     versions, since some artifacts are downloading
    > 0.9.4
    >     > instead
    >     >     > of use
    >     >     >     > > 0.9.5
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     Piotr, seems nobody  take the request to continue
    > with
    >     > the
    >     >     > release
    >     >     >     > for
    >     >     >     > > now,
    >     >     >     > >     so I propose to stabilize the repo.
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     Thoughts?
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     Carlos
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     El jue., 11 oct. 2018 a las 20:33, Piotr Zarzycki
    > (<
    >     >     >     > >     piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > Hi Alex,
    >     >     >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > Unfortunately in the next couple of days I won't
    > have
    >     > time
    >     >     > for
    >     >     >     > that.
    >     >     >     > > If
    >     >     >     > >     > someone can do that feel free jump into it.
    >     >     >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > Piotr
    >     >     >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 6:43 PM Alex Harui
    >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     > > wrote:
    >     >     >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > > After digging through the output you pasted, 
it
    >     > appears
    >     >     > that the
    >     >     >     > >     > > "check-empty-folder" target isn't quite right
    > and
    >     > didn't
    >     >     > catch
    >     >     >     > > that you
    >     >     >     > >     > > didn't run "maven" against an empty folder.
    >     > Although I am
    >     >     > a bit
    >     >     >     > > puzzled
    >     >     >     > >     > > why there were modified files in the working
    > copy.
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > > Maven and the scripts have some expectation
    > that you
    >     > are
    >     >     > starting
    >     >     >     > > from
    >     >     >     > >     > the
    >     >     >     > >     > > beginning, so if Maven got far enough to
    > create a
    >     > tag and
    >     >     > you
    >     >     >     > have
    >     >     >     > > to
    >     >     >     > >     > start
    >     >     >     > >     > > over, you have to remove the tag.  These
    > scripts are
    >     > still
    >     >     > under
    >     >     >     > >     > > development so you should not expect that 
every
    >     > situation
    >     >     > has
    >     >     >     > been
    >     >     >     > >     > > accounted for.
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > > So, go delete the tag.  Instructions for doing
    > so
    >     > are in
    >     >     > the
    >     >     >     > > wiki.  Maybe
    >     >     >     > >     > > figure out why those files were modified, but
    > maybe
    >     >     > because your
    >     >     >     > > earlier
    >     >     >     > >     > > run didn't have the right gpg password.
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > > Try changing the check-empty-folder to also
    > test for:
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >         <available
    >     >     > file="${basedir}/royale-asjs/build.properties"
    >     >     >     > >     > >             type="file"
    >     >     >     > >     > >             property="found.build.properties"
    >     > value="true"
    >     >     > />
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > > Then it should catch you on the steps where
    > you are
    >     >     > supposed to
    >     >     >     > > start by
    >     >     >     > >     > > pulling down the repos again.
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > > If you don't have time for any of that, let us
    > know
    >     > here
    >     >     > so the
    >     >     >     > > next RM
    >     >     >     > >     > > can know where to start.
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > > -Alex
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > > On 10/11/18, 2:05 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
    >     >     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     > >     > wrote:
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     I gave up again :) It costs me to much
    > time. I
    >     > thought
    >     >     > since
    >     >     >     > > Om did
    >     >     >     > >     > so
    >     >     >     > >     > > much
    >     >     >     > >     > >     progress I will launch the script and will
    > work.
    >     > It's
    >     >     > still
    >     >     >     > > failing.
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FWJ44&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C286f0f0c521a4b56968e08d6305db32b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749576336836019&amp;sdata=FkMpF3jJX%2B0xrf5QxjF%2FIREZbjotk%2FpeglEB0d6qhF8%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     I run first time and had problem with gpg
    >     > password -
    >     >     > just
    >     >     >     > > forgot it,
    >     >     >     > >     > > but
    >     >     >     > >     > >     run it again and type correct password.
    > Probably
    >     > first
    >     >     > time
    >     >     >     > > this tag
    >     >     >     > >     > > was
    >     >     >     > >     > >     created and now script failing cause tag
    > exits.
    >     > Never
    >     >     > ending
    >     >     >     > > story.
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     I'm in that step - If someone would like
    > to try
    >     > it out
    >     >     > let me
    >     >     >     > > know
    >     >     >     > >     > and
    >     >     >     > >     > > I
    >     >     >     > >     > >     won't revert anything for now:
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     ant -f releasecandidate.xml
    >     > -Drelease.version="0.9.4"
    >     >     >     > >     > > -Dbrowser="c:\Program
    >     >     >     > >     > >     Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe" -Drc=1
    > maven
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     Thanks,
    >     >     >     > >     > >     Piotr
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     czw., 11 paź 2018 o 10:13 Piotr Zarzycki <
    >     >     >     > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     napisał(a):
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     > Hi Alex,
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     > This is what I'm getting for git status
    > for
    >     >     > royale-compiler
    >     >     >     > > [1]
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     > [1]
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FYuiH&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C286f0f0c521a4b56968e08d6305db32b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749576336836019&amp;sdata=Cne1sBZ3FIwlNsfYuBlX7u%2BLAGGyQ5UZIgrFtolFeIo%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     > Thanks,
    >     >     >     > >     > >     > Piotr
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     > śr., 10 paź 2018 o 17:50 Alex Harui
    >     >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
    >     >     >     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > > napisał(a):
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> What does 'git status' return for that
    > local
    >     > copy
    >     >     > of the
    >     >     >     > >     > > royale-compiler
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> repo?
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> That part of the script is trying to
    > see if
    >     >     >     > > compiler-jburg-types
    >     >     >     > >     > and
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> compiler-build-tools needed a version
    > update
    >     > that
    >     >     > needs to
    >     >     >     > > be
    >     >     >     > >     > > pushed.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> Those two projects should be at 1.0.0
    > since we
    >     >     > rarely, if
    >     >     >     > > ever,
    >     >     >     > >     > > will need
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> to modify it.  There shouldn't have 
been
    >     >     > modifications in
    >     >     >     > > this
    >     >     >     > >     > > release, yet
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> Git status is reporting modifications
    > to some
    >     >     > file.  A
    >     >     >     > test
    >     >     >     > > is
    >     >     >     > >     > done
    >     >     >     > >     > > to
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> check for the word "modified:" in the
    > 'git
    >     > status'
    >     >     > output,
    >     >     >     > > then
    >     >     >     > >     > that
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> attempt to push is executed.  Somehow,
    > the git
    >     >     > status is
    >     >     >     > > implying
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> modifications but the files we are
    > trying to
    >     > push
    >     >     > are not
    >     >     >     > >     > modified.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> The solutions should not require
    > reverting of
    >     > the
    >     >     > release
    >     >     >     > > branch.
    >     >     >     > >     > > It
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> looks like you have successfully
    > created a
    >     > correct
    >     >     > set of
    >     >     >     > > branches
    >     >     >     > >     > > and the
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> steps you are running start by pulling
    > down
    >     > the
    >     >     > release
    >     >     >     > > branch.  I
    >     >     >     > >     > > didn't
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> see any commits to the release branch
    > from the
    >     >     > scripts, so
    >     >     >     > > to
    >     >     >     > >     > > re-start, it
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> should just be manually deleting the
    > local
    >     > copies
    >     >     > of the
    >     >     >     > > repos and
    >     >     >     > >     > > running
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> the Ant command again after making one
    > of the
    >     >     > changes to
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> releasecandidate.xml I will describe
    > below:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> IMO, the choices are (and there may be
    > more
    >     > choices)
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> 1.  Figure out how to be smarter about
    > what
    >     > 'git
    >     >     > status'
    >     >     >     > > output
    >     >     >     > >     > > will say
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> so the test works correctly
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> 2. Set failonerror="false" on the push
    > step
    >     > and not
    >     >     > care
    >     >     >     > if
    >     >     >     > > that
    >     >     >     > >     > > push
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> succeeds.  This is slightly risky if we
    > ever
    >     > do
    >     >     > want to
    >     >     >     > push
    >     >     >     > >     > > changes, but
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> again, that is low probability, IMO.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> 3. Comment out those steps since it
    > will be
    >     > rare we
    >     >     > will
    >     >     >     > > need
    >     >     >     > >     > > them.  If
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> we do need them some day, the RM will
    > have to
    >     >     > remember to
    >     >     >     > >     > uncomment
    >     >     >     > >     > > those
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> steps.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> HTH,
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> -Alex
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> On 10/10/18, 2:52 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
<
    >     >     >     > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> wrote:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     Ok It's failed :) However I passed
    > step 3
    >     > in
    >     >     >     > > instruction. Step
    >     >     >     > >     > > 4 is
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> failing
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     [1] - if someone know what could it
    > be -
    >     > I will
    >     >     > wait
    >     >     >     > > with
    >     >     >     > >     > > reverting
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> changes.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     Lines in stacktrace are pointing in
    > ant
    >     > script
    >     >     > to
    >     >     >     > > following
    >     >     >     > >     > > targets:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     Line 556: git-commit-and-push-utils
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     Line 487:
    >     > git-commit-and-push-utils-if-modified
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     Line 473:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     <exec executable="${git}"
    >     > dir="${compiler}"
    >     >     >     > >     > failonerror="true" >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>                 <arg value="commit" />
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>                 <arg value="-m" />
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>                 <arg value="remove
    > SNAPSHOT
    >     > from
    >     >     >     > >     > > compiler-jburg-types and
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     compiler-build-tools versions" />
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>             </exec>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     [1]
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fbg5e&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C286f0f0c521a4b56968e08d6305db32b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749576336836019&amp;sdata=AX%2FrgDVZSBrIQBMI7fS%2F%2BRy2q6qLudXm0YItRN8h2S0%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     Thanks,
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     Piotr
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     śr., 10 paź 2018 o 11:34 Carlos
    > Rovira <
    >     >     >     > >     > carlosrov...@apache.org
    >     >     >     > >     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> napisał(a):
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > Ok Piotr, good luck! :)
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > El mié., 10 oct. 2018 a las
    > 10:34, Piotr
    >     >     > Zarzycki (<
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
    > escribió:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > Hi Guys,
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > I will try right now process
    > from my
    >     > PC. We
    >     >     > will
    >     >     >     > > see how
    >     >     >     > >     > > far I
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> will go
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > with
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > that.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > Piotr
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > czw., 4 paź 2018 o 22:01 Alex
    > Harui
    >     >     >     > >     > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > napisał(a):
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > Hi Om,
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > If make_branches succeeds,
    > then you
    >     >     > shouldn't
    >     >     >     > > need to go
    >     >     >     > >     > > back
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> and
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > delete
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > branches and tags and run
    >     > make_branches
    >     >     > again if
    >     >     >     > > the
    >     >     >     > >     > > "maven"
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> step
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > fails.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > You might need to revert any
    >     > changes to
    >     >     > the
    >     >     >     > > release
    >     >     >     > >     > > branch that
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> the
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > "maven" step did, but then 
you
    >     > should be
    >     >     > able to
    >     >     >     > > delete
    >     >     >     > >     > > the
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> local copy
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > of
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > the branches and start again
    > with
    >     > "maven"
    >     >     > or
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    > "maven_skip_compiler_and_typedefs"
    >     > if you
    >     >     > got
    >     >     >     > all
    >     >     >     > > the
    >     >     >     > >     > way
    >     >     >     > >     > > up to
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > royale-asjs.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > What are some of the 200+
    > files that
    >     >     > don't get
    >     >     >     > > reverted
    >     >     >     > >     > > back to
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> 0.9.4?
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > You are welcome to try to add
    > the
    >     >     > "continue"
    >     >     >     > > option.  I
    >     >     >     > >     > > would
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> suggest
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > adding a dummy parameter.  So
    > if the
    >     >     > script
    >     >     >     > > currently
    >     >     >     > >     > > calls
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> Maven like
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > this:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >         <exec
    > executable="${mvn}"
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> dir="${basedir}/maven-release-plugin"
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > failonerror="true" >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >             <arg
    > value="clean" />
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >             <arg
    > value="install" />
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >         </exec>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > You can try changing it to
    >     > something like
    >     >     > this:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >         <property
    >     > name="continueOption"
    >     >     >     > >     > value="-Ddummy=0"
    >     >     >     > >     > > />
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >         <exec
    > executable="${mvn}"
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> dir="${basedir}/maven-release-plugin"
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > failonerror="true" >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >             <arg
    >     >     > value="${continueOption}" />
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >             <arg
    > value="clean" />
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >             <arg
    > value="install" />
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >         </exec>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > Then you should be able to
    > set in
    >     > your
    >     >     >     > > local.properties:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > continueOption=-rf
    > JewelExample
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > You will probably need to use
    >     > different
    >     >     > names
    >     >     >     > for
    >     >     >     > > each
    >     >     >     > >     > > call to
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> Maven so
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > subsequent Maven calls don't
    > pick
    >     > up the
    >     >     > same
    >     >     >     > > option.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > HTH,
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > -Alex
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > On 10/4/18, 11:58 AM,
    > "OmPrakash
    >     >     > Muppirala" <
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> bigosma...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > wrote:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at
    > 1:48 AM
    >     > Alex
    >     >     > Harui
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > wrote:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     > Om, it looks like you
    > are
    >     > still
    >     >     > deleting
    >     >     >     > and
    >     >     >     > >     > > recreating
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> the
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > branches.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     > Does this mean you have
    > never
    >     >     > completed
    >     >     >     > the
    >     >     >     > >     > > make_branches
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> step?
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     Yes, I delete the tags,
    > branches
    >     >     > (remote)
    >     >     >     > > each time
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> something
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > fails.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > Then
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     I do a global search for
    > 0.9.5
    >     > and
    >     >     > replace
    >     >     >     > it
    >     >     >     > > with
    >     >     >     > >     > > 0.9.4
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> (some 200+
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > files
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     across 3 repos), then
    > push them
    >     > into
    >     >     >     > > remote/develop.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     Then I do the
    > make_branches step
    >     >     > first.
    >     >     >     > Then
    >     >     >     > > do a
    >     >     >     > >     > > git push
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> in
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > roayale-asjs
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     as per the instructions
    > in the
    >     >     > commandline.
    >     >     >     > I
    >     >     >     > > have
    >     >     >     > >     > > never
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> had issues
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > with
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     this step.  It is always
    > the
    >     > maven
    >     >     > step that
    >     >     >     > > fails
    >     >     >     > >     > > for some
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> reason
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > or
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > the
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     other.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     > Is make_branches 
failing
    >     > trying to
    >     >     > run a
    >     >     >     > > build in
    >     >     >     > >     > > the
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> develop
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > branch
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > and
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     > uploading 
0.9.5-SNAPSHOT
    >     > artifacts?
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     No
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     > I supposed we could try
    > to
    >     > find a
    >     >     > way to
    >     >     >     > > skip
    >     >     >     > >     > that,
    >     >     >     > >     > > but
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> you will
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > need
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     > reliable uploading to
    >     >     > repository.a.o to be
    >     >     >     > > an RM
    >     >     >     > >     > > without
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> going
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > crazy.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     Hmm, I use the same
    > internet
    >     >     > connection for
    >     >     >     > > personal
    >     >     >     > >     > > and
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> work
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > related
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     activities.  I don't
    > usually
    >     > have
    >     >     > issues
    >     >     >     > with
    >     >     >     > >     > > internet.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> Either we
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > are
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > very
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     unlucky here or we need a
    > more
    >     >     > reselient way
    >     >     >     > > to pick
    >     >     >     > >     > > up
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> things if
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > we
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > lose
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     internet connectivity
    >     > momentarily.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     It takes upwards of 90
    > minutes
    >     > of
    >     >     > uploading
    >     >     >     > > stuff. I
    >     >     >     > >     > > dont
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> do this
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > kind
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > of
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     uploading for my regular
    > work,
    >     > so
    >     >     > that is
    >     >     >     > > probably I
    >     >     >     > >     > > have
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> never hit
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > this
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     issue before.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     I still think that
    > looking into
    >     > the
    >     >     >     > > 'resume-from'
    >     >     >     > >     > > directive
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> in
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > maven
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > is
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     worthwhile.
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     Thanks,
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     Om
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     > -Alex
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     > On 10/3/18, 2:11 PM,
    >     > "OmPrakash
    >     >     >     > Muppirala" <
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> bigosma...@gmail.com
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > wrote:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >     On Wed, Oct 3, 2018
    > at
    >     > 2:02 PM
    >     >     > Alex
    >     >     >     > > Harui
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     > wrote:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >     > Hi Om,
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >     > Does anything
    > deploy,
    >     > or is
    >     >     > that the
    >     >     >     > > first
    >     >     >     > >     > > thing
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >> that is
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > > attempted to
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >     > deploy?  I found
    > this
    >     > article
    >     >     > that
    >     >     >     > > might
    >     >     >     > >     > help:
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>
    >     >     >     > >     > >
    >     >     >     > >     >
    >     >     >     > >
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.apigee.com%2Fquestions%2F50756%2Funable-to-deploy-using-maven-script-due-to-error-r.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C286f0f0c521a4b56968e08d6305db32b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749576336836019&amp;sdata=37Y8PNBSozC09ktSb4Dwtr8f%2BQDg2TGQCYOQBCiaEHA%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >
    >     >     >     > >     > >     >>     > > >     >     It deployed a lot 
of
    >     > artifacts
    >     >     > before
    >     >     >     > > hitting
    >     >     >
    
    
    
    -- 
    
    Piotr Zarzycki
    
    Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C286f0f0c521a4b56968e08d6305db32b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749576336836019&amp;sdata=o6jTszCVmQzxYYS8jPsV%2FXLtI6tT7P%2FsR365VF2XQrA%3D&amp;reserved=0
    
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C286f0f0c521a4b56968e08d6305db32b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749576336836019&amp;sdata=o6jTszCVmQzxYYS8jPsV%2FXLtI6tT7P%2FsR365VF2XQrA%3D&amp;reserved=0>*
    

Reply via email to