Hi
Our Apache Royale Application has been compiled successfully. Java side
Application is running as before on Tomcat Server.
Our Application shows initial screen on browser i.e. Login Screen using
http://localhost:8080/SHMA/index.html . When we click on LoginButton,On click
event we call a server side method using mx:remoteobject .
Following are the configuration details :
We are using these configuration files for Royale - Java Communication :
https://github.com/alinakazi/configFiles
We want to call our Java side methods using mx:RemoteObject in our Royale
Application.
We have provided Destination property as shmUserSetupBO_General.
shmUserSetupBO_General destination is defined in remoting-config.xml file.
<mx:RemoteObject id="roLogin" channelSet="{parentApplication.amfChannelSet}"
showBusyCursor="true"
destination="shmUserSetupBO_General" fault="fn_HandleFault(event);"
result="fn_roLoginRH(event);"/>
Our Royale Application is unable to communicate with server side code.
We have tried it using endpoint property as well but still no response from
server side Java Application.
endpoint = "http://localhost:8080/messagebroker/websocket-amf";
Thanks in Advance,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 6:07 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
I'm using mx:RemoteObject for my app so some thoughts:
* To make mx:RemoteObject work you only need to specify "destination" and
"endpoint"
* avoid "source" since is a deprecated property that exposes your java
backend, that was maintained only for compatibility with very old AMF
implementations
* I think latest time I tried channelSet I couldn't make it work, but I
couldn't dedicate too much time, so it could be worth to see if now works
with latest changes
* for the rest since proxy is working in RO you can call remote methods in
java in the exact same way you did in flex.
* just remember set small messages off in BlazeDS, since we still doesn't
support it
IOW, you can work today with RO without issue just turning off small
messages and setting destination and endpoint. If you can try to test
channelset, please report your findings
thanks
El mié., 7 nov. 2018 a las 8:59, Alina Kazi (<alina.k...@d-bz.com>)
escribió:
> Hi Alex
>
> For MX:RemoteObject :
> We have created an Example :
> https://github.com/alinakazi/Examples/tree/master/HelloWorld
> Our Welcome.mxml file in Example uses mx:RemoteObject this way :
>
> <mx:RemoteObject id="roLogin"
> channelSet="{parentApplication.amfChannelSet}" showBusyCursor="true"
>
> destination="shmUserSetupBO_General" fault="fn_HandleFault(event);"
>
> result="fn_roLoginRH(event);"/>
>
> We have a remoting-config.xml file in Java\web\WEB-INF\conf
> <destination id="shmUserSetupBO_General">
> <properties>
>
> <source>com.shm.BO.SEC.shmUserSetupBO_General</source>
> </properties>
> </destination>
>
> Our Java Application contains a class :
> com.shm.BO.SEC.shmUserSetupBO_General
> It contains a method :
> public String f_sendMail (String aLoginName){............... return str;
> }
>
> I am calling that method using remoteObject from Apache Royale Application.
> roLogin.f_sendMail(loginName.text);
>
> Will it work using functionality available in Apache Royale SDK or Do I
> have to make changes in my front end Application (Royale) to work ?
> Example is available here:
> https://github.com/alinakazi/Examples/tree/master/HelloWorld
>
>
> Thanks in Advance,
> Alina kazi
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alina Kazi [mailto:alina.k...@d-bz.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 10:49 AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Mx:ModuleLoader is compiled successfully now I can see mx:Module on output
> screen.
> Now I will work on remote object.
>
> -Thanks,
> Alina Kazi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2018 10:38 AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> I cannot work with .RAR files. Plus dropbox won't display MXML files.
>
> Examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules is using mx:ModuleLoader. It is
> better to compare what it is doing instead of what Basic UIModuleLoader is
> doing.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 11/5/18, 4:16 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> You have created an Example in royale/ModuleExample
> Contains two files in different projects : MainApp.mxml and Module.mxml
> MainApp uses UIModuleLoader and it loads the modules with moduleName &
> modulePath properties.
>
> UIModuleLoader extends UIBase
> In MXRoyale, ModuleLoader extends VBox extends Box extends Container
> extends UIComponent extends UIBase
>
> UIModule extends Group extends GroupBase extends UIBase
> In MXRoyale, Module extends Container extends UIComponent extends
> UIBase
>
> We have compare all files , functionality is copied from Basic ->
> MXRoyale , default.css is also copied.
> We have checked default.css for Basic's Group, GroupBase
> We have checked default.css for MXRoyale's Container
>
> Still my Example do not compile for MX Module before and after
> changes.
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dropbox.com%2Fs%2Ftxbccb5ofblmnr9%2FModuleExampleMX.rar%3Fdl%3D0&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999270941&sdata=FwC038v2mIDz2Uvj0yWGzNejIuDOSiNH9sHyyY6AVxg%3D&reserved=0
>
> We are using url = "modules/Module.swf" instead of modulePath =
> "modules" and moduleName = "Module"
>
> We have seen functionality again and again after comparison we have
> copied missing src from Basic -> MXRoyale
> Please compile this example with output for us or Guide us.
>
> Thanks in Advance,
> Alina Kazi
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alina Kazi [mailto:alina.k...@d-bz.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 10:07 AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> When I tried after mapping BorderContainer to MX Container with the
> lookupOnly="true" in the spark-royale-manifest.xml, It worked for me.
>
> Thanks,
> Alina
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 9:48 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> I think you can ignore that error unless you see other errors in the
> browser console related to it.
>
> Did you check the browser console for errors when it came up blank?
> Or step into the code to see whether the new code is being called? And
> compare to how MX Container works? These are strategies and skills that
> will be helpful as a developer.
>
> If your code doesn't require that BorderContainer is a
> SkinnableContainer, you could try mapping BorderContainer to MX Container
> with the lookup-"true" in the spark-royale-manifest.xml
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/30/18, 4:52 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> 1. You may have to copy other CSS from MX Container's or Spark
> Group's base classes and put all of it in the BorderContainer selector.
> MX Container extends UIComponent , So I copied only MX Container's
> CSS in BorderContainer selector.
>
> 2. It would have been more helpful to see what you had put in the
> defaults.css file, and also, since the compile was successful
>
> What I have copied in default.css:
>
> BorderContainer
> {
>
> IBeadView:
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.ContainerView");
> IBeadLayout:
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.layouts.BasicLayout");
> IViewport:
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.ScrollingViewport");
> IViewportModel:
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.models.ViewportModel");
>
> }
>
> In @media -royale-swf
> BorderContainer
> {
> IBackgroundBead:
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.SolidBackgroundBead");
> IBorderBead:
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.SingleLineBorderBead");
> IContentView:
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.ContainerContentArea");
> }
> 3. I think you will need to copy code from MX Container into
> SkinnableContainer, especially the MXMLDataInterpreter code.
>
> Now, I have copy code from MX Container into SkinnableContainer,
> MXMLDataInterpreter code and copied other code step by step that was
> related to Bead.
>
>
>
> Output is blank as before, following are the links shared earlier :
> While compiling the ControlsExample
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FppOz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999270941&sdata=PbPkfCOdDZm1T1YkablUxjceytSXd0n0g3ax7kDyDXQ%3D&reserved=0
> Output has 1 Error & 1 warning and Build Successfully, console is :
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F5YMM&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999270941&sdata=EFIN%2FaCR6cJB8o%2FrGOgv6%2FX5XG4nKEv5P%2BOT1B53S9s%3D&reserved=0
>
>
> Thanks in Advance,
> Alina Kazi
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 1:54 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> You may have to copy other CSS from MX Container's or Spark
> Group's base classes and put all of it in the BorderContainer selector.
>
> If all rules are royale-specific, like IBeadModel, then they won't
> be listed in the output css but should be in the main .JS file.
>
> It would have been more helpful to see what you had put in the
> defaults.css file, and also, since the compile was successful, whether
> there were any errors at run time.
>
> I looked briefly at BorderContainer and SkinnableContainer. I
> think you will need to copy code from MX Container into SkinnableContainer,
> especially the MXMLDataInterpreter code
>
> I have to stop working for tonight.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/30/18, 12:54 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> 1. I would think that BorderContainer could use the same beads
> as MX Container, or even Spark Group.
> I have tried both MX Container / Spark Group Beads
> Case(A) I have copied MX Container from file (defaults.css
> in MXRoyale/src/main/resource) to (defaults.css in
> SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) renamed Container to BorderContainer in
> (defaults.css in SparkRoyale/src/main/resource).
> Case(B) I have copied Spark GroupBase from file
> (defaults.css in SparkRoyale /src/main/resource) to (defaults.css in
> SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) renamed copied word GroupBase to
> BorderContainer in (defaults.css in SparkRoyale/src/main/resource).
>
>
> 2. Not having BorderContainer in the output CSS is unexpected
> if you are using it in the MXML
>
> In Both Cases A and B the output default.css file for
> ControlsExample contains
> .BorderContainer {
> }
>
> In Both Cases A and B output default.css file for
> SparkRoyale.swc contains
> Whatever I copied to (defaults.css in
> SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) for BorderContainer.
>
> 3. that you are using the same namespace prefix as other
> components that are working
> Yes I am using same namespace prefix as other components that
> are working
>
>
>
> [1] ControlsExample File :
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FppOz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=zVrzXVGnd1%2FyHTRYibeByWChrlgO2CEpzPeSOy8RSlo%3D&reserved=0
> [2] SparkRoyale.swc console output :
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FrsqI&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=GiUGZ%2BtQQWMrevZkc0EVmhU6mUkCO%2FvVrG7IwOsyGDc%3D&reserved=0
> ( Case B :When GroupBase default.css is copied for BorderContainer)
> [3] ControlsExample console output :
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FXY7o&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=dmilOA%2BmDYtKbh9wYu3jYiwK9HqEY8l2XboYLktj8sQ%3D&reserved=0
> ( Case B :When GroupBase default.css is copied for BorderContainer)
> [4] SparkRoyale.swc console output :
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fsm8M&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=Q7%2Bd39c9fC0l79lORzaeKVGDbJLCmvK7hs2KjCQ%2Fjrw%3D&reserved=0
> ( Case A :When Container default.css is copied for BorderContainer)
> [5] ControlsExample console output :
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F5YMM&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=h24BzzkAeswpbl6er%2FYavvOvtPzANrCSrAvVkULlmYo%3D&reserved=0
> ( Case A :When Container default.css is copied for BorderContainer)
>
> Yes the output from compiling the SparkRoyale SWC does not
> contain any warnings about BorderContainer, and the SWC builds successfully
> and is being copied into the right places
> I have checked by unzipping the SWC and checked the
> defaults.css and JS files
>
> Thanks,
> Alina Kazi
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 9:14 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> Again, it is important to be efficient in communication. Just
> telling me the ModuleLoader does not load a module does not let me help
> you. You should try to remember past emails we had and report on what you
> tried from those past emails. For example, do you get any warnings or
> errors in the console? Did you verify that the files are where they should
> be? Did you step through how TourDeFlexModules loads a module and compare
> to your application?
>
> For BorderContainer, and really, any UI widget in the Royale
> emulation components, an important thing to understand is that they are, so
> far, all based on UIBase, since UIComponent extends UIBase and all UI
> widgets extend UIComponent. That means that the CSS must load model and
> view beads and often controller and/or layout and other beads. So first
> thing is to understand by examining source and output whether there are
> such beads for BorderContainer. I would think that BorderContainer could
> use the same beads as MX Container, or even Spark Group.
>
> I don't think we've implemented spark skins in SparkRoyale
> yet, so any skinClass is going to get ignored right now.
>
> Not having BorderContainer in the output CSS is unexpected if
> you are using it in the MXML. So I would double check that you have added
> BorderContainer to the correct CSS file (defaults.css in
> SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) and that you are using the same namespace
> prefix as other components that are working, and that the output from
> compiling the SparkRoyale SWC does not contain any warnings about
> BorderContainer, and the SWC builds successfully and is being copied into
> the right places. SWC files are really ZIP files so you can always unzip
> the SWC and examine the defaults.css and JS files.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
> On 10/29/18, 4:11 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Please answer for the following issues :
> 1. Issue (MX ModuleLoader) :
> We need similar working as in TourdeFlexModules Example :
>
>
> D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\mxroyale\tourdeflexmodules\src\spark\components\VideoPlayerModuleLoader.mxml
> ModuleLoader url property does not load Module.
>
> 2. Issue (Spark BorderContainer) :
> If we use s:BorderContainer all controls inside Spark
> BorderContainer are not shown in output.
> How it will be shown in output. Do I need to add something
> in default.css for BorderContainer
> We have added
> BorderContainer
> {
> backgroundColor: #FFFFFF;
> borderStyle : "solid";
> cornerRadius: 0;
> skinClass:
> ClassReference("spark.skins.spark.BorderContainerSkin");
> } in SparkRoyale default.css but still output is empty.
> All other files applications.mxml and shmApplication.as
> are same as before
> [1] AppView_ERP.mxml
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FY2ne&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=OHdSxXNmmbSoXpUlHI0USOIaVbWtyVHHUihHOTgybJw%3D&reserved=0
>
>
> Thanks,
> Alina Kazi
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alina Kazi [mailto:alina.k...@d-bz.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 12:03 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Thanks a lot Alex. It works.
>
> -Alina
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 12:03 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> Add the following metadata to your shmApplication.as It
> should go before the "public class". Check mx.core.Application to see how
> it is placed in that file.
>
> [Frame(factoryClass="mx.managers.SystemManager")]
>
> This should result in an
> applications_mx_managers_SystemManager.js file in the bin/js-debug folder,
> and the index.html should try to instantiate that file which should then
> launch everything else.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
>
> On 10/28/18, 11:54 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Files in the bin/js-debug folder
> Files :
> AppView_ERP.js
> applications.css
> applications.js
> index.html
> Namespace.js
> QName.js
> shmApplication.js
> XML.js
> XMLList.js
>
> Folders :
> library
> mx
> org
>
> Thanks,
> Alina Kazi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 11:48 AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> When you use shmApplication, what files end up in the
> bin/js-debug folder (the subfolders don't matter right now).
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/28/18, 11:40 PM, "Alina Kazi" <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> Yes, I am running the js-debug version. If I do
> similar working in mx:Application tag it works but when I do it with custom
> shmApplication control that extends mx.core.Application it does not show
> anything in output.
>
> My file applications.mxml starts with tag
> <cc:shmApplication>
> And shmApplication.as extends mx.core.Application.
> I am adding namespace xmlns:cc="*"
>
> [1] applications.mxml
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOpDT&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=eQtufZ0nzd2iepnZ09p8WItiZI0dcSZIWpyrM1f%2F76M%3D&reserved=0
> [2] shmApplication.as
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FPz6p&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=or99%2F%2F9TME5LbjJ7n0uWQUF22ksVWpuBSFFCMrUkG9U%3D&reserved=0
> [3] AppView_ERP.mxml
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FRLcA&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=71g3utug8iFq40xa4%2BXJuOoCD0gC%2BDxbXkFQBsizB28%3D&reserved=0
>
> All files are placed on same path.
>
> When I replace applications.mxml opening and
> closing tag <cc:shmApplication> tag to <mx:Application>
> It shows both Button and Label in output. But I
> need to use shmApplication.
>
> Again these are not my actual source files . It's
> just a scenario we need . So, I create a separate example for that.
>
> Thanks,
> Alina Kazi
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
>
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 11:02 AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> Are you running the version in js-debug? It
> should show something in the console. Also look at the DOM tree and see
> what HTML elements have been created, if any.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/28/18, 10:28 PM, "Alina Kazi" <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Piotr,
>
> Application is compiled Successfully but
> nothing shows in output in the Web Browser Console when running my
> application.
>
> Thanks,
> Alina
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Piotr Zarzycki [mailto:
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 7:09 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To
> Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> Just to help a bit with all of that. Do you
> see any output in the Web
> Browser Console when you running your
> application ? If yes provide it here.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pt., 26 paź 2018 o 14:42 Alina Kazi <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Alex,
> > We have 3 files in our Project
> > Files Path is :
> > [1]Project -> applications.mxml (main file)
> > [2]Project ->shmApplication.as extends
> mx.core.Application
> > [3]Project-> AppView_ERP.mxml
> >
> > As MX ViewStack , Canvas are working
> controls.
> >
> > AppView_ERP.mxml has initial tag mx:Canvas
> >
> > applications.mxml has initial tag
> cc:shmApplication and
> > We have method in applications.mxml
> > private function
> fn_roBasicConfRH(e:ResultEvent):void
> > {
> > var
> appViewStack:ViewStack = new
> > ViewStack();
> >
> >
> appViewStack.percentWidth = 100;
> >
> appViewStack.percentHeight = 100;
> >
> this.addElement(appViewStack);
> >
> > var
> compERPView:Canvas = new AppView_ERP()
> > as Canvas;
> >
> >
> compERPView.id = "appView_ERP";
> > appView =
> compERPView;
> >
> appViewStack.addElement(compERPView);
> >
> > mx.external.ExternalInterface.call("function
> > setWinStatus(){window.status='" +
> iniFileParams.CompanyName + "';}");
> >
> > }
> > Application is compiled Successfully but
> nothing shows in output.
> > If you need more details. I can create an
> example Project.
> >
> > Thanks in Advance,
> > Alina Kazi
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alina Kazi [mailto:alina.k...@d-bz.com
> ]
> > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 3:35 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component
> To Run
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > We have replaced import
> spark.components.Application with import
> > mx.core.Application in our whole
> Application. After this change we are
> > still able to compile our Application
> successfully.
> > Are you using SWFLoader to load other
> applications? Again, your API
> > Report did not mention this.
> > We are not using SWFLoader anywhere in our
> Application. We are using
> > ModuleLoader only.
> > What do you mean by needing Spark
> Application many times?
> > Sorry, import spark.components.Application
> is written multiple times in
> > src code but used once.
> >
> > That means now we don't need Spark
> Application.
> > Thanks for Helping us.
> >
> > -Alina Kazi
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Harui [mailto:
> aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 12:45 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component
> To Run
> >
> > Hi Alina,
> >
> > Where did you use mx:Application in your
> application? Somehow it got into
> > the report.
> >
> > What do you mean by needing Spark
> Application many times? Are you using
> > SWFLoader to load other applications?
> Again, your API Report did not
> > mention this.
> >
> > Getting Application to work can be
> significant amount of work as it has a
> > lot of things to do. One approach you could
> take is to step through your
> > example with mx:Application and compare it
> to the Spark Application and
> > make changes to the Spark Application until
> it works, but I'm concerned
> > that you can't always copy code from
> mx:Application.
> >
> > If you want to take on a big challenge like
> getting Appilcation to work
> > that is fine, but I guess I can delay my
> work on Charts and get Spark
> > Application to work. Let me know what you
> decide. But I am very concerned
> > about the accuracy of the data you have
> provided. I'm wondering what else
> > you are using that we don't know about.
> >
> > I'm done for today. I will see what you
> decide in my morning.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/26/18, 12:22 AM, "Alina Kazi" <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex ,
> > I am using skinClass 2 times overall in
> my Application. I can skip
> > that if it takes a lot of time.
> > I don't know How API report skip some
> API's.
> > We need SparkApplication at many places
> in our Application.
> > If you can explain more in [1] , we want
> to also participate in
> > getting emulation component to run.
> >
> > Like Spark TextInput is now working as
> MX TextInput, We have copied
> > some source from MX TextInput to Spark
> TextInput after reading [1] and it
> > worked.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FEmulation-Components%23getting-an-emulation-component-to-run&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=8kcPT8ZhnvwGC9dnJjipCpC8rYthLbBV1Un93kD5XzY%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > Thanks in Advance,
> > Alina Kazi
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Harui [mailto:
> aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 11:50 AM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation
> Component To Run
> >
> > Hi Alina,
> >
> > In your API report, only
> mx.core.Application was referenced. I don't
> > understand why Spark Application was not
> referenced, yet you are using it
> > now. We have not spent any time getting
> Spark Application to run. If
> > that's really what you need, I would start
> copying code from
> > mx.core.Application. if you don't have
> custom skins for Application, you
> > can probably skip the skinning-related code.
> >
> > Good luck,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/25/18, 11:10 PM, "Alina Kazi" <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi ,
> >
> > We are able to compile our
> Application and Library Projects
> > successfully. Application Launch file uses a
> file that extends Spark
> > Application.as file. This Spark
> Application.as file is present in Apache
> > Royale SDK repo and has been emulated. But
> when we run the application, No
> > visual output is shown in index.html (i.e
> output file)
> >
> > Spark Application extends
> SkinnableContainer in Flex SDK
> > default.css for SkinnableContainer is:
> > SkinnableContainer
> > {
> > skinClass:
> >
> ClassReference("spark.skins.spark.SkinnableContainerSkin");
> > }
> >
> >
> > In Flex mx:Application extends
> LayoutContainer extends Container
> > in Flex SDK default.css for Container is
> >
> > Container
> > {
> > borderSkin:
> >
> ClassReference("mx.skins.spark.ContainerBorderSkin");
> > borderStyle: "none";
> > cornerRadius: 0;
> > }
> >
> > You have added in MXRoyale
> default.css
> >
> > Container
> > {
> > IBeadView:
> >
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.ContainerView");
> > IBeadLayout:
> >
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.layouts.BasicLayout");
> > IViewport:
> >
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.ScrollingViewport");
> > IViewportModel:
> >
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.models.ViewportModel");
> > }
> >
> > And mx:Application shows output.
> >
> > For Example :
> >
> > [1] Nothing in Output
> > <s:Application xmlns:fx="
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=MKP51sGDrTIYFArUTYRgH6FuIdCRoOCIPjpVR64XJDc%3D&reserved=0
> "
> >
> >
> > xmlns:s="library://
> ns.apache.org/royale/spark"
> >
> > xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx"
> height = "100%" width =
> > "100%"
> >
> >
> >
> <s:Button x="30" y="30"
> > id="searchBtn" label="Search"/>
> >
> > </s:Application>
> >
> > [2] It shows Button in output file
> > <mx:Application xmlns:fx="
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=MKP51sGDrTIYFArUTYRgH6FuIdCRoOCIPjpVR64XJDc%3D&reserved=0
> "
> >
> >
> > xmlns:s="library://
> ns.apache.org/royale/spark"
> >
> > xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx"
> height = "100%" width =
> > "100%"
> >
> >
> >
> <s:Button x="30" y="30"
> > id="searchBtn" label="Search"/>
> >
> > </mx:Application>
> >
> > How can I get Spark Application
> working as MX Application ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alina
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Harui [mailto:
> aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 10:04
> PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation
> Component To Run
> >
> > Hi Alina,
> >
> > Again, I cannot help you as
> efficiently if you do not provide
> > important details.
> >
> > You are showing some part of the
> console for building the
> > application. But did the compiler hang, or
> did it think it finished? What
> > does your build.xml look like? What was the
> full console output? I would
> > want to see what command you typed and all
> output up to and including the
> > command prompt after it finished. As I
> mentioned in prior emails, use
> > paste.apache.org if necessary for large
> quantities of console output.
> >
> > From the one line you pasted below,
> it implied the build did not
> > finish, yet you are saying that you tried to
> run it and nothing showed up.
> > Why would you try to run it if the build did
> not finish? If the build did
> > finish, did you get the expected output
> files? If the build did not
> > finish, try stripping down what is in the
> Module until it works, or compare
> > the build.xml settings against
> examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules.
> >
> > There are so many ways things can go
> wrong, especially when
> > developing new code. You must learn how to
> work efficiently in these
> > conditions.
> >
> > Another technique is to compare
> working against non-working.
> > Examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules is able
> to compile and load modules.
> > You can set breakpoints in the
> tourdeflexmodules code and follow how it
> > works and set breakpoints in similar places
> in your code and follow how it
> > works and compares.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/22/18, 1:12 AM, "Alina Kazi" <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > This time I told you about
> folders hierarchy its same as
> > examples/royale/ModuleExample.
> > js:UIModuleLoader is replaced
> with mx:ModuleLoader url
> > property is added in ModuleLoader and extra
> properties are removed,
> > js:UIModule is replaced with mx:Module
> > js:Application is replaced with
> mx:Application
> > namespace is replaced with mx
> namespace
> >
> > Console output stopped at :
> > [mxmlc] 109142 bytes written to
> >
> D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\royale\ModuleExample\Module\bin-debug\Module.swf
> > in 3.220 seconds
> >
> > How else I can explain it in a
> better way.
> > Simply I just want same working
> like
> > examples/royale/ModuleExample with Mx
> Controls.
> > I am not using TitleWindow in my
> current example.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alina Kazi
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Harui [mailto:
> aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018
> 12:40 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Getting An
> Emulation Component To Run
> >
> > Hi Alina,
> >
> > Again, half a world away, I
> cannot know what your folder
> > structure and build files look like, or what
> you tried or didn't try. And
> > now, I have to stop working and we missed an
> opportunity to help you
> > because the important information was not
> provided in your earlier email.
> > I wrote some techniques in this email:
> >
> >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread.html%2Fe6f3aa4010dca8c9bdbe2828a89295039d05d23806a5fe03ae18dbe4%40%253Cdev.royale.apache.org%253E&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=2i2XAQViO%2BSHv15rhcuZKTTvjK6kwNjC40%2FhwCLh%2FSk%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > In your next email, I expect you
> see evidence that you have
> > understood and tried the techniques in the
> email I linked. You will be
> > expected to provide console output or
> information about the tree of
> > elements. And this might be a good
> opportunity for you to try the debugger
> > and set breakpoints in various places. Even
> if you don't actually solve
> > the problem you are facing, you are going to
> have to become an expert in
> > debugging JavaScript output from the Royale
> Compiler.
> >
> > Please reserve the time to write
> a really good email with the
> > important information and questions. It
> will save all of us time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/21/18, 11:39 PM, "Alex
> Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alina,
> >
> > The key piece for modules is
> getting the output in the
> > right place. Flex/Flash has some
> interesting rules around how URLs got
> > loaded. I haven't found a practical way to
> replicate that in the Browser,
> > so for now, it is up to you to put the
> output where you are telling
> > ModuleLoader to load it.
> >
> > If you look at the Ant
> build.xml for royale/ModuleExample,
> > the Module/build.xml assumes the MainApp has
> been built first and copies
> > its output files into the MainApp's output
> folders.
> >
> > If you look at the build.xml
> for
> > mxroyale/touredeflexexamples, it uses the
> -module-output compiler option to
> > redirect the output.
> >
> > If you look in the Browser
> console, I expect you will see
> > errors that it couldn’t find a particular JS
> file for the module. Pay
> > attention to the folders and adjust your
> build script to place the output
> > in the right place (or adjust where you tell
> ModuleLoader to find the
> > module.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/21/18, 11:22 PM,
> "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Created an example
> contains two files :
> > 1. Module.mxml
> > <mx:Module xmlns:fx="
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=MKP51sGDrTIYFArUTYRgH6FuIdCRoOCIPjpVR64XJDc%3D&reserved=0
> > "
> >
> xmlns:mx="library://
> > ns.apache.org/royale/mx">
> >
> > <mx:Label text="This
> Label is in the module" />
> > <mx:TextInput
> id="ti" text="This TextInput is also
> > in the module" />
> > </mx:Module>
> >
> > 2. MainApp.mxml
> > <mx:Application
> xmlns:fx="
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=MKP51sGDrTIYFArUTYRgH6FuIdCRoOCIPjpVR64XJDc%3D&reserved=0
> > "
> >
> xmlns:mx="library://
> > ns.apache.org/royale/mx" >
> >
> > <mx:Button
> label="Btn in Application" />
> >
> > <mx:ModuleLoader id
> = "ml1" x="30" y="30" url =
> > "Module.swf" />
> >
> > </mx:Application>
> >
> > No visual output shown .
> I want it to work like
> > examples\royale\ModuleExample
> >
> >
> > Thanks in Advance ,
> > Alina Kazi
> >
> > -----Original
> Message-----
> > From: Alex Harui [mailto:
> aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October
> 16, 2018 9:33 PM
> > To:
> dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Getting An
> Emulation Component To Run
> >
> > Hi Alina,
> >
> > I think there is a
> misunderstanding somewhere.
> >
> > How has your company
> built the Flex app over the past
> > years? Is it all from an IDE or do you have
> some sort of script or build
> > tool?
> >
> > Whatever you are using
> to build the Flex app should be
> > translated to the Ant script. What is
> currently in the Ant script you
> > copied from tourdeflexmodules is custom
> designed for tourdeflexmodules. It
> > presumes lots of little applications that
> don't use custom libraries.
> >
> > The mxmlc task in Ant is
> just like running mxml from
> > the command line or having an Application
> project in an IDE.
> > The compc task in Ant is
> just like running compc from
> > the command line or having a Library project
> in an IDE.
> >
> > You can see from the
> build.xml files in the
> > royale-asjs repo that we build SWCs by
> having a build.xml in each library
> > folder and calling them from a build.xml in
> a parent folder. You might
> > find that pattern useful.
> >
> > You will need to
> understand the -source-path and
> > -library-path and -external-library-path and
> other compiler options that
> > were used to build the Flex app and copy
> probably all of those options into
> > the right place in the Ant scripts.
> >
> > It would be uncommon to
> compile a file called shmUtil
> > with mxmlc. shmUtil sounds like a file in a
> library, not a standalone
> > application. I'll bet it comes from a
> library that should be compiled with
> > compc along with a lot of other files.
> >
> >
> > If you are having
> trouble with Ant, also try the
> > command-line, then others may be able to
> help you see the differences
> > between your Ant script and what worked on
> the command-line. If you use an
> > IDE to build the Flex app, you will need to
> find out all of the compiler
> > options the IDE sets up for you. I think
> others can help you with that as
> > well.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/16/18, 2:17 AM,
> "Alina Kazi" <
> > alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Created a mxmlc task
> directly in build.xml still
> > an error is occured :
> > Added to Build.xml :
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FwBDm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=ZuiXnvzQxolOK7rsx8%2F8JCmAG8daVfC2T1qG7cuh4cE%3D&reserved=0
> > Error :
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOXFT&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=tBRJXpe4JHzu9HndjsTs9iQwHqDqXq%2FQhZrD%2FpuWtLI%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alina Kazi
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original
> Message-----
> > From: Alex Harui
> [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday,
> October 16, 2018 11:46 AM
> > To:
> dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Getting
> An Emulation Component To Run
> >
> > Hi Alina,
> >
> > The example in
> > examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest is
> working and accesses the server
> > that is in examples/amf/ SampleAmfWebApp.
> Theoretically, your old
> > mx:RemoteObject code should work untouched.
> Try it without touching it and
> > tell us what kinds of errors you are
> getting. If you are getting runtime
> > errors, see how the RemoteObjectAMFTest uses
> "casting" to be explicit about
> > the types of the RemoteObject expressions.
> You'll see "as Operation" to
> > indicate that an mx:method in an
> mx:RemoteObject is an Operation.
> >
> > The compile-mxml
> macro is in the build.xml file.
> > It has certain expectations of the structure
> of the source files. Your
> > source files are likely have a different
> folder structure. You will need
> > to add source-paths and other compiler
> options to the macro, or stop using
> > the macro and call the mxmlc ant task
> directly. That is up to you. This
> > is a good opportunity to get to know Ant and
> the compiler better.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/15/18, 11:07
> PM, "Alina Kazi" <
> > alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex & Carlos,
> > I haven't tested
> my ported Application with
> > server side functionality yet.
> > Can you please
> share an Example that I can
> > follow to get my mx:RemoteObject working as
> FLEX.
> >
> > I have another
> question
> >
> > I am working on
> my Application and it has two
> > different directories like
> com->shm->modules->AP and
> > com->shm->modules->components and I want to
> compile a file inside
> > com->shm->modules->AP->abc.mxml and it uses
> a file inside
> > com->shm->modules->components->xyz.mxml.
> > I have added
> <compile-mxml
> > folder="/com/shm/modules/AP/" example="
> abc"/> to build.xml.
> > unable to
> access xyz inside abc.
> >
> > Like
> >
> D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\mxroyale\tourdeflexmodules\src\spark\components\
> > VideoPlayerExample.mxml is using
> VideoPlayer.mxml in my case
> > VideoPlayer.mxml is not is the same
> directory.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alina Kazi
> >
> > -----Original
> Message-----
> > From: Carlos
> Rovira [mailto:
> > carlosrov...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday,
> October 16, 2018 12:26 AM
> > To:
> dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re:
> Getting An Emulation Component To
> > Run
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > yes, I added
> those classes when worked trying
> > to make it work in net RO, but I found a
> wall at that time. I think DSK
> > objects had a different code when
> deserialized, and our AMF implementation
> > was not able to handle that.
> > I was not able
> to know how to deal with that
> > so I had to abandon. At least I could pass
> that disabling small messages on
> > BlazeDS.
> >
> > I don't think
> Small Messages are very
> > important, don't know how "small"
> > will be, so I
> think we can go to other things
> > more important. If I found some problem as I
> start to grow my application
> > that could be related to small messages I'll
> report. Hope not find any issue
> >
> > The only
> drawback could be people coming that
> > must know they need to disable small
> messages on their BlazeDS.
> >
> > I think it will
> be more important later since
> > IExternalizable in itself seems an important
> addition.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 15 oct.
> 2018 a las 20:21, Alex Harui
> > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > The classes
> that represent DSK, DSA and DSC
> > are in the MXRoyale and
> > > Network
> projects, but it looks like they
> > implement IExternalizable. I
> > > don't see any
> evidence that the JS AMF
> > support currently handles
> > >
> IExternalizable.
> > >
> > > I'm not clear
> on how important SmallMessages
> > and IExternalizable are.
> > > If it isn't
> that important, there are plenty
> > of other things to work
> > > on. If it is
> important, do we have a test
> > case that uses IExternalizable?
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/15/18,
> 10:55 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes,
> > >
> > > I tried
> today (with code
> > pre-callProperty, that I think does not make
> > > difference
> for this).
> > > There's
> small message support in RPC
> > classes, but when I looked at that
> > > code when
> I investigate it, I think must
> > be accompanied from some AMF
> > >
> serialization/deserialization support. I
> > couldn't find any resources on
> > > this in
> the internet about how to handle
> > DSK, DSA or DSC. Maybe
> > > you can ask
> > > internally
> in Adobe how to deal with
> > that. My guess is that this
> > > was added
> > > to Flash
> plugin AMF serialization
> > capabilities.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El lun.,
> 15 oct. 2018 a las 19:03, Alex
> > Harui
> > >
> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Carlos,
> > > >
> > > > Have you
> verified that small messages
> > do not work with the MX
> > > >
> RemoteObject? I thought I saw Small
> > Message support when I was
> > > migrating
> > > > the code.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On
> 10/15/18, 10:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
> > <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> Alina,
> > > >
> > > > just
> for if you don't know. If you
> > use BlazeDS Java server,
> > > remember
> > > > to set
> > > > up
> small messages to false, or you
> > RemoteObjects will not work.
> > > To get
> > > >
> small messages we'll need to
> > upgrade AMF
> > >
> serialization-deserialization
> > > > to
> > > > know
> how to handle DSK, DSA, and
> > DSC RemoteClass aliases.
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > >
> > > >
> Carlos
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El
> lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 18:39,
> > Alex Harui
> > > >
> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> > > >
> escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi
> Alina,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Good to know. You (and anybody
> > working with the emulation
> > > >
> components) are
> > > > >
> expected to keep track of the
> > commits to the royale-compiler
> > > as well
> > > > as the
> > > > >
> royale-asjs repos and stay
> > updated. We are still finding bugs
> > > in the
> > > > >
> transpiling that may affect you.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Thanks,
> > > > >
> -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > On
> 10/15/18, 2:17 AM, "Alina
> > Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Thanks a lot it worked for
> > me.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -Alina kazi
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:
> > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > > >
> Sent: Monday, October 15,
> > 2018 2:07 PM
> > > > >
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > > >
> Subject: Re: Getting An
> > Emulation Component To Run
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi Alina,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Are you sure you are using
> > the latest compiler? Try
> > > compiling
> > > > >
> > examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest. It
> compiles without
> > > errors
> > > > for me.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> I have to stop for tonight.
> > Hopefully others will help
> > > you.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > >
> On 10/15/18, 1:37 AM, "Alina
> > Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> We are using MX Remote
> > Object in almost our every
> > > Class like
> > > > this:
> > > > >
> <mx:RemoteObject
> > > >
> >
> channelSet="{parentApplication.amfChannelSet}"
> > > > >
> id="DataProviderService"
> > showBusyCursor="true"
> > > > >
> > > > >
> destination="shmBasic"
> > fault="handleFault(event);"
> > > > >
> > > > >
> result="handleResult(event);" />
> > > > >
> We get error ASBlocker
> > subsystem.
> > > > >
> When we comment
> > RemoteObject we need to comment methods
> > > > those are
> > > > >
> using it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> I agree with that if I
> > will delete some code for
> > > compilation
> > > > I
> > > > >
> will face other issues at later
> > stage.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Can I replace
> > mx:remoteObject with :
> > > > >
> <s:RemoteObject id="ro"
> > endpoint="
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jamesward.com%2Fcensus2-tests%2Fmessagebroker%2Famf&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=4sIL88V%2Bit8tvbuKSVwm9XeWmdDkO0yxSd4%2B5o5nth4%3D&reserved=0
> > > > "
> > > > >
> destination="census"/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Thanks in Advance,
> > > > >
> Alina Kazi
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -----Original
> > Message-----
> > > > >
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:
> > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > > >
> Sent: Monday, October
> > 15, 2018 1:16 PM
> > > > >
> To:
> > dev@royale.apache.org
> > > > >
> Subject: Re: Getting An
> > Emulation Component To Run
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi Alina,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> I recommend just running
> > the compiled application and
> > > fixing
> > > > >
> problems as you run into them.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> If you start copying
> > code and deleting other code, you
> > > cannot
> > > > >
> guarantee that the results will
> > run. I'm not even sure
> > > TitleWindow
> > > > is a
> > > > >
> valid child control of an
> > Application. Usually it is a popup
> > > dialog.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> When you run the
> > application, you will probably find
> > > >
> exceptions in
> > > > >
> the console. Set a breakpoint,
> > see if you can figure out why
> > > it is
> > > > >
> generating an exception. Change
> > the code as needed.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> If you aren’t getting
> > exceptions, then look at the
> > > element
> > > > tree.
> > > > >
> Either all of the expected
> > elements have been created or not.
> > > If
> > > > not, then
> > > > >
> look at the innermost element to
> > see what it is. In the
> > > properties
> > > > for the
> > > > >
> element is a royale_wrapper
> > property that points to the
> > > transpiled
> > > > AS3
> > > > >
> class. That can help you know
> > what class didn't create its
> > > children.
> > > > >
> Check the _beads array of that
> > class to see if it created its
> > > beads
> > > > or
> > > > >
> not. If not, check the CSS for
> > that element, or debug into
> > > its code.
> > > > >
> Usually, addedToParent is where
> > the view bead is added.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> If the elements have
> > been created, check the sizes.
> > > Often
> > > > some of
> > > > >
> them will have width or height =
> > 0. Try to figure why it is
> > > getting
> > > > a bad
> > > > >
> size.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> If you take this
> > approach, then if you get stuck you
> > > can ask
> > > > a
> > > > >
> much more specific question and
> > we can give you more specific
> > > > answers.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Unfortunately, our days
> > only overlap by a few hours,
> > > but I
> > > > hope
> > > > >
> other committers can help as
> > well. It is in their best
> > > interest to
> > > > improve
> > > > >
> their help and debugging skills.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > >
> On 10/15/18, 12:59 AM,
> > "Alina Kazi" <
> > >
> alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> As our whole
> > application is compiled successfully
> > > without
> > > > >
> error as a part of SparkRoyale
> > Library.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Now, We have created
> > a project like
> > >
> tourdeflexmodules to
> > > > >
> compile and visually see the
> > application output.
> > > > >
> Initially started
> > with the basic(small) file of our
> > > > >
> application that is used by most
> > of the files of our
> > > Application.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> We have a file in
> > our application "Picklist.mxml"
> > > > >
> It was actually like
> > :
> > > > >
> [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FRVtj&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=%2BVxE%2Btgxg37E%2FWFBkj6Bs%2BFTKm3o1RbzwORC1ZnFT2M%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> we want to see it
> > visually as all our mx and spark
> > > > controls
> > > > >
> are already added in Apache
> > Royale.
> > > > >
> Deleted whole code
> > accept visual controls from src
> > > file :
> > > > >
> [2]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FH4Sm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=yhFRufdC9vB%2BmaKuo3rPCdG2DsfHq0%2BiSZ8mAWdwAU4%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Nothing shows inside
> > spark BorderContainer &
> > > TitleWindow.
> > > > >
> [3]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FEpS8&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999300964&sdata=XEZqR0WI7%2FzzBIx4d6hQti9ezzLLRpMCzOcVa5OCZTI%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> How can we see all
> > visual controls as they were in
> > > Flex
> > > > of
> > > > >
> this particular file.
> > > > >
> Even spark
> > BorderContainer default.css is copied
> > > from
> > > > Flex
> > > > >
> ->Royale.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Thanks,
> > > > >
> Alina Kazi
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -----Original
> > Message-----
> > > > >
> From: Alex Harui
> > [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > > >
> Sent: Monday,
> > October 15, 2018 11:15 AM
> > > > >
> To:
> > dev@royale.apache.org
> > > > >
> Subject: Re: Getting
> > An Emulation Component To Run
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi Alina,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Different APIs will
> > have different solutions.
> > > Pick an
> > > > API you
> > > > >
> want to have work and let's
> > discuss how to make it work.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > >
> On 10/14/18, 10:48
> > PM, "Alina Kazi" <
> > >
> alina.k...@d-bz.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> All mx and spark
> > class methods those were left
> > > empty
> > > > for
> > > > >
> the compilation of Application.
> > > > >
> Also Module does
> > not show anything on screen.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Thanks in
> > Advance,
> > > > >
> Alina
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -----Original
> > Message-----
> > > > >
> From: Alex Harui
> > [mailto:
> > >
> aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > > >
> Sent: Thursday,
> > October 11, 2018 12:32 PM
> > > > >
> To:
> > dev@royale.apache.org
> > > > >
> Subject: Re:
> > Getting An Emulation Component To
> > > Run
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi Alina,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Which components
> > or properties are you trying
> > > to get
> > > > to
> > > > >
> run?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > >
> On 10/10/18,
> > 10:40 PM, "Alina Kazi" <
> > > >
> alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > > >
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> What if CSS
> > for a component is not written
> > > in
> > > > Basic /
> > > > >
> Express defaults.css?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> And We need
> > it in MXRoyale / SparkRoyale
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Alina Kazi
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> From: Alex
> > Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > > > >
> Sent:
> > Monday, October 08, 2018 8:40 PM
> > > > >
> To: Alina
> > Kazi
> > > > >
> Subject: Re:
> > Getting An Emulation
> > > Component To
> > > > Run
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi Alina,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Please ask
> > these questions on dev@ as
> > > well.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> CSS with
> > ClassReference is a way to use
> > > >
> Composition to
> > > > >
> customize components. Copying
> > code is usually a bad practice
> > > as it
> > > > >
> creates maintenance issues. So,
> > in general, the preference
> > > should
> > > > be to
> > > > >
> use CSS.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> HTH,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> From: Alina
> > Kazi <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > > >
> Date:
> > Monday, October 8, 2018 at 2:02 AM
> > > > >
> To: Alex
> > Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
> > > > >
> Subject:
> > Getting An Emulation Component To
> > > Run
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> We want to
> > know how can we identify which
> > > is the
> > > > right
> > > > >
> stub?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> For Example:
> > selected property written
> > > >
> differently in
> > > > >
> CheckBox, RadioButton and
> > > > >
> > > > >
> we want
> > selected property for Button. How
> > > can we
> > > > >
> identify and pick the right code
> > for Button?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> 1.
> > copying the little bits of code
> > > from the
> > > > >
> Basic or Express version into
> > the right stub in the Emulation
> > > > Component
> > > > >
> > > > >
> 2.
> > copying the CSS from Basic or
> > > Express
> > > > >
> defaults.css into the MXRoyale
> > or SparkRoyale defaults.css
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Thanks in
> > Advance,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> Alina Kazi
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> Carlos Rovira
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999300964&sdata=H3oweoyqUtp%2BQ4z0SmjOxQhBLqasvSr04RQUwA4w76w%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos
> Rovira
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.
> > >
> me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> > 40adobe.com%7C04eb29f37fce
> > >
> >
> 40d3df9908d632c77330%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6367
> > >
> >
> 52229546474497&sdata=7S2M%2BRlyCsWd2pShdvTsjfyJp9xyZ5bdaAc3zZQrilU
> > >
> %3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999300964&sdata=H3oweoyqUtp%2BQ4z0SmjOxQhBLqasvSr04RQUwA4w76w%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999300964&sdata=0hoONGV3E7erIqjMul7811MvEP5fQl89KSYxnNkT67M%3D&reserved=0
> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999300964&sdata=0hoONGV3E7erIqjMul7811MvEP5fQl89KSYxnNkT67M%3D&reserved=0
> >*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
