Hi Alina, my recomendation is that you start with a very basic AMF call to test communications. Maybe adding some simple getString method that sends a String and retrieves the string modified would be enough, so you can figure what's could be wrong. I can confirm you that MX RO is working and we're migrating a Flex App that relays on AMD MX RO for 97% of server calls. Still finding some little issues on the way to fix, but it's working
El mar., 13 nov. 2018 a las 11:44, Alina Kazi (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Hi Carlos, > > We have added to channel : > <enable-small-messages>false</enable-small-messages> in services-config.xml > file > But still our Royale Application is unable to call java side method. > > Thank, > Alina Kazi > -----Original Message----- > From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 3:12 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > Hi Alina, > > can you confirm that you turned off small messages in BlazeDS ? > thanks > > > El mar., 13 nov. 2018 a las 8:28, Alina Kazi (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > > > Hi Alex, > > > > We are not getting any error on browser console. > > I have set breakpoints on my java side code. Method I am calling from > > Royale Application is not called on Java Side. > > I sent you configuration files. Please look into them. Will they work > same > > as Flex-Java Application Communication. > > If those files are OK. Then what could be the reason that our Royale > > Application is unable to call java side methods ? > > > > Thanks, > > Alina > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 12:19 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > > > Are there any errors in the browser console? > > > > If not, set breakpoints and debug into it and/or use a network monitor to > > see if anything is being sent or received. RemoteObject has Operations > > that eventually call NetConnection. > > > > HTH, > > -Alex > > > > On 11/12/18, 10:54 PM, "Alina Kazi" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi > > Our Apache Royale Application has been compiled successfully. Java > > side Application is running as before on Tomcat Server. > > Our Application shows initial screen on browser i.e. Login Screen > > using http://localhost:8080/SHMA/index.html . When we click on > > LoginButton,On click event we call a server side method using > > mx:remoteobject . > > Following are the configuration details : > > We are using these configuration files for Royale - Java > Communication > > : > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Falinakazi%2FconfigFiles&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519969668&sdata=%2BYpSl8YrGutxw928MPYFtgYT%2BjydqsDcPLr3p8cDTAA%3D&reserved=0 > > We want to call our Java side methods using mx:RemoteObject in our > > Royale Application. > > We have provided Destination property as shmUserSetupBO_General. > > shmUserSetupBO_General destination is defined in remoting-config.xml > > file. > > > > <mx:RemoteObject id="roLogin" > > channelSet="{parentApplication.amfChannelSet}" showBusyCursor="true" > > destination="shmUserSetupBO_General" > fault="fn_HandleFault(event);" > > result="fn_roLoginRH(event);"/> > > > > Our Royale Application is unable to communicate with server side > code. > > We have tried it using endpoint property as well but still no > response > > from server side Java Application. > > endpoint = "http://localhost:8080/messagebroker/websocket-amf"; > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > Alina Kazi > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 6:07 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > I'm using mx:RemoteObject for my app so some thoughts: > > > > * To make mx:RemoteObject work you only need to specify "destination" > > and > > "endpoint" > > * avoid "source" since is a deprecated property that exposes your > java > > backend, that was maintained only for compatibility with very old AMF > > implementations > > * I think latest time I tried channelSet I couldn't make it work, > but I > > couldn't dedicate too much time, so it could be worth to see if now > > works > > with latest changes > > * for the rest since proxy is working in RO you can call remote > > methods in > > java in the exact same way you did in flex. > > * just remember set small messages off in BlazeDS, since we still > > doesn't > > support it > > > > IOW, you can work today with RO without issue just turning off small > > messages and setting destination and endpoint. If you can try to test > > channelset, please report your findings > > > > thanks > > > > > > El mié., 7 nov. 2018 a las 8:59, Alina Kazi (<[email protected]>) > > escribió: > > > > > Hi Alex > > > > > > For MX:RemoteObject : > > > We have created an Example : > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Falinakazi%2FExamples%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2FHelloWorld&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519969668&sdata=VsYOBm4iT%2Fc7cfqrKGRpOIjISxHuyL8gvkUXK0Qvcqw%3D&reserved=0 > > > Our Welcome.mxml file in Example uses mx:RemoteObject this way : > > > > > > <mx:RemoteObject id="roLogin" > > > channelSet="{parentApplication.amfChannelSet}" > showBusyCursor="true" > > > > > > destination="shmUserSetupBO_General" > fault="fn_HandleFault(event);" > > > > > > result="fn_roLoginRH(event);"/> > > > > > > We have a remoting-config.xml file in Java\web\WEB-INF\conf > > > <destination id="shmUserSetupBO_General"> > > > <properties> > > > > > > <source>com.shm.BO.SEC.shmUserSetupBO_General</source> > > > </properties> > > > </destination> > > > > > > Our Java Application contains a class : > > > com.shm.BO.SEC.shmUserSetupBO_General > > > It contains a method : > > > public String f_sendMail (String aLoginName){............... > > return str; > > > } > > > > > > I am calling that method using remoteObject from Apache Royale > > Application. > > > roLogin.f_sendMail(loginName.text); > > > > > > Will it work using functionality available in Apache Royale SDK or > > Do I > > > have to make changes in my front end Application (Royale) to work ? > > > Example is available here: > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Falinakazi%2FExamples%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2FHelloWorld&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519969668&sdata=VsYOBm4iT%2Fc7cfqrKGRpOIjISxHuyL8gvkUXK0Qvcqw%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > > Alina kazi > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alina Kazi [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 10:49 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > Mx:ModuleLoader is compiled successfully now I can see mx:Module on > > output > > > screen. > > > Now I will work on remote object. > > > > > > -Thanks, > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2018 10:38 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > I cannot work with .RAR files. Plus dropbox won't display MXML > > files. > > > > > > Examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules is using mx:ModuleLoader. It > is > > > better to compare what it is doing instead of what Basic > > UIModuleLoader is > > > doing. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 11/5/18, 4:16 AM, "Alina Kazi" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > You have created an Example in royale/ModuleExample > > > Contains two files in different projects : MainApp.mxml and > > Module.mxml > > > MainApp uses UIModuleLoader and it loads the modules with > > moduleName & > > > modulePath properties. > > > > > > UIModuleLoader extends UIBase > > > In MXRoyale, ModuleLoader extends VBox extends Box extends > > Container > > > extends UIComponent extends UIBase > > > > > > UIModule extends Group extends GroupBase extends UIBase > > > In MXRoyale, Module extends Container extends UIComponent > extends > > > UIBase > > > > > > We have compare all files , functionality is copied from Basic > -> > > > MXRoyale , default.css is also copied. > > > We have checked default.css for Basic's Group, GroupBase > > > We have checked default.css for MXRoyale's Container > > > > > > Still my Example do not compile for MX Module before and after > > > changes. > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dropbox.com%2Fs%2Ftxbccb5ofblmnr9%2FModuleExampleMX.rar%3Fdl%3D0&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519969668&sdata=bZp5kN0jR8tkA3WMX8Yv3N%2F4LOszheWsXRPadWFZOGw%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > We are using url = "modules/Module.swf" instead of modulePath = > > > "modules" and moduleName = "Module" > > > > > > We have seen functionality again and again after comparison we > > have > > > copied missing src from Basic -> MXRoyale > > > Please compile this example with output for us or Guide us. > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alina Kazi [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 10:07 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > When I tried after mapping BorderContainer to MX Container with > > the > > > lookupOnly="true" in the spark-royale-manifest.xml, It worked for > me. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Alina > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 9:48 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > I think you can ignore that error unless you see other errors > in > > the > > > browser console related to it. > > > > > > Did you check the browser console for errors when it came up > > blank? > > > Or step into the code to see whether the new code is being called? > > And > > > compare to how MX Container works? These are strategies and skills > > that > > > will be helpful as a developer. > > > > > > If your code doesn't require that BorderContainer is a > > > SkinnableContainer, you could try mapping BorderContainer to MX > > Container > > > with the lookup-"true" in the spark-royale-manifest.xml > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 10/30/18, 4:52 AM, "Alina Kazi" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > 1. You may have to copy other CSS from MX Container's or > > Spark > > > Group's base classes and put all of it in the BorderContainer > > selector. > > > MX Container extends UIComponent , So I copied only MX > > Container's > > > CSS in BorderContainer selector. > > > > > > 2. It would have been more helpful to see what you had put > > in the > > > defaults.css file, and also, since the compile was successful > > > > > > What I have copied in default.css: > > > > > > BorderContainer > > > { > > > > > > IBeadView: > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.ContainerView"); > > > IBeadLayout: > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.layouts.BasicLayout"); > > > IViewport: > > > > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.ScrollingViewport"); > > > IViewportModel: > > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.models.ViewportModel"); > > > > > > } > > > > > > In @media -royale-swf > > > BorderContainer > > > { > > > IBackgroundBead: > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.SolidBackgroundBead"); > > > IBorderBead: > > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.SingleLineBorderBead"); > > > IContentView: > > > > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.ContainerContentArea"); > > > } > > > 3. I think you will need to copy code from MX Container > into > > > SkinnableContainer, especially the MXMLDataInterpreter code. > > > > > > Now, I have copy code from MX Container into > > SkinnableContainer, > > > MXMLDataInterpreter code and copied other code step by step that > was > > > related to Bead. > > > > > > > > > > > > Output is blank as before, following are the links shared > > earlier : > > > While compiling the ControlsExample > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FppOz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519979673&sdata=2KBOCUoHIdAyoviandQZ9EwPgU4hzpxOCfQpHVbOGWc%3D&reserved=0 > > > Output has 1 Error & 1 warning and Build Successfully, > > console is : > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F5YMM&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519979673&sdata=YnXId1mAWdFNq7t%2BBZT%2FazboqvX5aylN3HUj1KPu4Rc%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 1:54 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > You may have to copy other CSS from MX Container's or Spark > > > Group's base classes and put all of it in the BorderContainer > > selector. > > > > > > If all rules are royale-specific, like IBeadModel, then > they > > won't > > > be listed in the output css but should be in the main .JS file. > > > > > > It would have been more helpful to see what you had put in > > the > > > defaults.css file, and also, since the compile was successful, > > whether > > > there were any errors at run time. > > > > > > I looked briefly at BorderContainer and SkinnableContainer. > > I > > > think you will need to copy code from MX Container into > > SkinnableContainer, > > > especially the MXMLDataInterpreter code > > > > > > I have to stop working for tonight. > > > > > > HTH, > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 10/30/18, 12:54 AM, "Alina Kazi" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > 1. I would think that BorderContainer could use the > same > > beads > > > as MX Container, or even Spark Group. > > > I have tried both MX Container / Spark Group Beads > > > Case(A) I have copied MX Container from file > > (defaults.css > > > in MXRoyale/src/main/resource) to (defaults.css in > > > SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) renamed Container to BorderContainer > > in > > > (defaults.css in SparkRoyale/src/main/resource). > > > Case(B) I have copied Spark GroupBase from file > > > (defaults.css in SparkRoyale /src/main/resource) to (defaults.css > in > > > SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) renamed copied word GroupBase to > > > BorderContainer in (defaults.css in SparkRoyale/src/main/resource). > > > > > > > > > 2. Not having BorderContainer in the output CSS is > > unexpected > > > if you are using it in the MXML > > > > > > In Both Cases A and B the output default.css file for > > > ControlsExample contains > > > .BorderContainer { > > > } > > > > > > In Both Cases A and B output default.css file for > > > SparkRoyale.swc contains > > > Whatever I copied to (defaults.css in > > > SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) for BorderContainer. > > > > > > 3. that you are using the same namespace prefix as > other > > > components that are working > > > Yes I am using same namespace prefix as other > components > > that > > > are working > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] ControlsExample File : > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FppOz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519979673&sdata=2KBOCUoHIdAyoviandQZ9EwPgU4hzpxOCfQpHVbOGWc%3D&reserved=0 > > > [2] SparkRoyale.swc console output : > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FrsqI&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519979673&sdata=%2B2PHTZF45DHi1qoiMgrynFRAgVR6FmndtWTowls5Z0s%3D&reserved=0 > > > ( Case B :When GroupBase default.css is copied for BorderContainer) > > > [3] ControlsExample console output : > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FXY7o&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519979673&sdata=HVtdskAQrh096gmztl9kJTq%2FLx%2Bj5KfQTQ0bJqudvbk%3D&reserved=0 > > > ( Case B :When GroupBase default.css is copied for BorderContainer) > > > [4] SparkRoyale.swc console output : > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fsm8M&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519979673&sdata=UPIdQ%2BQJBQ3OzI4DoipHIfRAfAPPI9%2BZeO%2BZ0sJalNE%3D&reserved=0 > > > ( Case A :When Container default.css is copied for BorderContainer) > > > [5] ControlsExample console output : > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F5YMM&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519979673&sdata=YnXId1mAWdFNq7t%2BBZT%2FazboqvX5aylN3HUj1KPu4Rc%3D&reserved=0 > > > ( Case A :When Container default.css is copied for BorderContainer) > > > > > > Yes the output from compiling the SparkRoyale SWC does > > not > > > contain any warnings about BorderContainer, and the SWC builds > > successfully > > > and is being copied into the right places > > > I have checked by unzipping the SWC and checked the > > > defaults.css and JS files > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 9:14 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > Again, it is important to be efficient in > > communication. Just > > > telling me the ModuleLoader does not load a module does not let me > > help > > > you. You should try to remember past emails we had and report on > > what you > > > tried from those past emails. For example, do you get any warnings > > or > > > errors in the console? Did you verify that the files are where > they > > should > > > be? Did you step through how TourDeFlexModules loads a module and > > compare > > > to your application? > > > > > > For BorderContainer, and really, any UI widget in the > > Royale > > > emulation components, an important thing to understand is that they > > are, so > > > far, all based on UIBase, since UIComponent extends UIBase and all > UI > > > widgets extend UIComponent. That means that the CSS must load > model > > and > > > view beads and often controller and/or layout and other beads. So > > first > > > thing is to understand by examining source and output whether there > > are > > > such beads for BorderContainer. I would think that BorderContainer > > could > > > use the same beads as MX Container, or even Spark Group. > > > > > > I don't think we've implemented spark skins in > > SparkRoyale > > > yet, so any skinClass is going to get ignored right now. > > > > > > Not having BorderContainer in the output CSS is > > unexpected if > > > you are using it in the MXML. So I would double check that you > have > > added > > > BorderContainer to the correct CSS file (defaults.css in > > > SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) and that you are using the same > > namespace > > > prefix as other components that are working, and that the output > from > > > compiling the SparkRoyale SWC does not contain any warnings about > > > BorderContainer, and the SWC builds successfully and is being > copied > > into > > > the right places. SWC files are really ZIP files so you can always > > unzip > > > the SWC and examine the defaults.css and JS files. > > > > > > HTH, > > > -Alex > > > On 10/29/18, 4:11 AM, "Alina Kazi" < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > Please answer for the following issues : > > > 1. Issue (MX ModuleLoader) : > > > We need similar working as in TourdeFlexModules > > Example : > > > > > > > > > D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\mxroyale\tourdeflexmodules\src\spark\components\VideoPlayerModuleLoader.mxml > > > ModuleLoader url property does not load Module. > > > > > > 2. Issue (Spark BorderContainer) : > > > If we use s:BorderContainer all controls inside > Spark > > > BorderContainer are not shown in output. > > > How it will be shown in output. Do I need to add > > something > > > in default.css for BorderContainer > > > We have added > > > BorderContainer > > > { > > > backgroundColor: #FFFFFF; > > > borderStyle : "solid"; > > > cornerRadius: 0; > > > skinClass: > > > ClassReference("spark.skins.spark.BorderContainerSkin"); > > > } in SparkRoyale default.css but still output is > > empty. > > > All other files applications.mxml and > > shmApplication.as > > > are same as before > > > [1] AppView_ERP.mxml > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FY2ne&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519979673&sdata=EJCjn4BKhznt2idSOKhGKnlh06MitNB9BSgbeoZMtuk%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alina Kazi [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 12:03 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > Thanks a lot Alex. It works. > > > > > > -Alina > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 12:03 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > Add the following metadata to your > > shmApplication.as It > > > should go before the "public class". Check mx.core.Application to > > see how > > > it is placed in that file. > > > > > > [Frame(factoryClass="mx.managers.SystemManager")] > > > > > > This should result in an > > > applications_mx_managers_SystemManager.js file in the bin/js-debug > > folder, > > > and the index.html should try to instantiate that file which should > > then > > > launch everything else. > > > > > > HTH, > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > On 10/28/18, 11:54 PM, "Alina Kazi" < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > Files in the bin/js-debug folder > > > Files : > > > AppView_ERP.js > > > applications.css > > > applications.js > > > index.html > > > Namespace.js > > > QName.js > > > shmApplication.js > > > XML.js > > > XMLList.js > > > > > > Folders : > > > library > > > mx > > > org > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > > [email protected]] > > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 11:48 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To > > Run > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > When you use shmApplication, what files end up > > in the > > > bin/js-debug folder (the subfolders don't matter right now). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 10/28/18, 11:40 PM, "Alina Kazi" < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > Yes, I am running the js-debug version. If > I > > do > > > similar working in mx:Application tag it works but when I do it > with > > custom > > > shmApplication control that extends mx.core.Application it does not > > show > > > anything in output. > > > > > > My file applications.mxml starts with tag > > > <cc:shmApplication> > > > And shmApplication.as extends > > mx.core.Application. > > > I am adding namespace xmlns:cc="*" > > > > > > [1] applications.mxml > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOpDT&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519979673&sdata=xL7Ot%2BKANul8Lso6j%2BT5syJRM%2BdjJfy0WHV36RMt2L4%3D&reserved=0 > > > [2] shmApplication.as > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FPz6p&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519979673&sdata=1hgcxcGmYw59WZOJiXhds71RlI%2BjqQwb5iDCQ0D8B84%3D&reserved=0 > > > [3] AppView_ERP.mxml > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FRLcA&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519989677&sdata=XwdVRE4ucCN0nnBoQPxJE9SdNDKQxBEeyvRo41kj8V0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > All files are placed on same path. > > > > > > When I replace applications.mxml opening > and > > > closing tag <cc:shmApplication> tag to <mx:Application> > > > It shows both Button and Label in output. > > But I > > > need to use shmApplication. > > > > > > Again these are not my actual source files > . > > It's > > > just a scenario we need . So, I create a separate example for that. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > > [email protected]] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 11:02 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component > > To Run > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > Are you running the version in js-debug? > It > > > should show something in the console. Also look at the DOM tree > and > > see > > > what HTML elements have been created, if any. > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 10/28/18, 10:28 PM, "Alina Kazi" < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Piotr, > > > > > > Application is compiled Successfully > but > > > nothing shows in output in the Web Browser Console when running my > > > application. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Alina > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Piotr Zarzycki [mailto: > > > [email protected]] > > > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 7:09 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation > > Component To > > > Run > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > Just to help a bit with all of that. Do > > you > > > see any output in the Web > > > Browser Console when you running your > > > application ? If yes provide it here. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Piotr > > > > > > pt., 26 paź 2018 o 14:42 Alina Kazi < > > > [email protected]> napisał(a): > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > We have 3 files in our Project > > > > Files Path is : > > > > [1]Project -> applications.mxml (main > > file) > > > > [2]Project ->shmApplication.as > extends > > > mx.core.Application > > > > [3]Project-> AppView_ERP.mxml > > > > > > > > As MX ViewStack , Canvas are working > > > controls. > > > > > > > > AppView_ERP.mxml has initial tag > > mx:Canvas > > > > > > > > applications.mxml has initial tag > > > cc:shmApplication and > > > > We have method in applications.mxml > > > > private function > > > fn_roBasicConfRH(e:ResultEvent):void > > > > { > > > > var > > > appViewStack:ViewStack = new > > > > ViewStack(); > > > > > > > > > > > appViewStack.percentWidth = 100; > > > > > > > appViewStack.percentHeight = 100; > > > > > > > this.addElement(appViewStack); > > > > > > > > var > > > compERPView:Canvas = new AppView_ERP() > > > > as Canvas; > > > > > > > > > > > compERPView.id = "appView_ERP"; > > > > > > appView = > > > compERPView; > > > > > > > appViewStack.addElement(compERPView); > > > > > > > > > > mx.external.ExternalInterface.call("function > > > > setWinStatus(){window.status='" + > > > iniFileParams.CompanyName + "';}"); > > > > > > > > } > > > > Application is compiled Successfully > > but > > > nothing shows in output. > > > > If you need more details. I can > create > > an > > > example Project. > > > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Alina Kazi [mailto: > > [email protected] > > > ] > > > > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 3:35 > PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation > > Component > > > To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > We have replaced import > > > spark.components.Application with import > > > > mx.core.Application in our whole > > > Application. After this change we are > > > > still able to compile our Application > > > successfully. > > > > Are you using SWFLoader to load other > > > applications? Again, your API > > > > Report did not mention this. > > > > We are not using SWFLoader anywhere > in > > our > > > Application. We are using > > > > ModuleLoader only. > > > > What do you mean by needing Spark > > > Application many times? > > > > Sorry, import > > spark.components.Application > > > is written multiple times in > > > > src code but used once. > > > > > > > > That means now we don't need Spark > > > Application. > > > > Thanks for Helping us. > > > > > > > > -Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > > > [email protected]] > > > > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 12:45 > PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation > > Component > > > To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > Where did you use mx:Application in > > your > > > application? Somehow it got into > > > > the report. > > > > > > > > What do you mean by needing Spark > > > Application many times? Are you using > > > > SWFLoader to load other applications? > > > Again, your API Report did not > > > > mention this. > > > > > > > > Getting Application to work can be > > > significant amount of work as it has a > > > > lot of things to do. One approach > you > > could > > > take is to step through your > > > > example with mx:Application and > > compare it > > > to the Spark Application and > > > > make changes to the Spark Application > > until > > > it works, but I'm concerned > > > > that you can't always copy code from > > > mx:Application. > > > > > > > > If you want to take on a big > challenge > > like > > > getting Appilcation to work > > > > that is fine, but I guess I can delay > > my > > > work on Charts and get Spark > > > > Application to work. Let me know > what > > you > > > decide. But I am very concerned > > > > about the accuracy of the data you > have > > > provided. I'm wondering what else > > > > you are using that we don't know > about. > > > > > > > > I'm done for today. I will see what > > you > > > decide in my morning. > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/26/18, 12:22 AM, "Alina Kazi" < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex , > > > > I am using skinClass 2 times > > overall in > > > my Application. I can skip > > > > that if it takes a lot of time. > > > > I don't know How API report skip > > some > > > API's. > > > > We need SparkApplication at many > > places > > > in our Application. > > > > If you can explain more in [1] , > > we want > > > to also participate in > > > > getting emulation component to run. > > > > > > > > Like Spark TextInput is now > > working as > > > MX TextInput, We have copied > > > > some source from MX TextInput to > Spark > > > TextInput after reading [1] and it > > > > worked. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FEmulation-Components%23getting-an-emulation-component-to-run&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519989677&sdata=8b6my8j9pSVJsTcAubdvj4Cls1mZ7KXL9YDcXo7UkA0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > > > [email protected]] > > > > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 > > 11:50 AM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation > > > Component To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > In your API report, only > > > mx.core.Application was referenced. I don't > > > > understand why Spark Application was > > not > > > referenced, yet you are using it > > > > now. We have not spent any time > > getting > > > Spark Application to run. If > > > > that's really what you need, I would > > start > > > copying code from > > > > mx.core.Application. if you don't > have > > > custom skins for Application, you > > > > can probably skip the > skinning-related > > code. > > > > > > > > Good luck, > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/25/18, 11:10 PM, "Alina > > Kazi" < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > > > We are able to compile our > > > Application and Library Projects > > > > successfully. Application Launch file > > uses a > > > file that extends Spark > > > > Application.as file. This Spark > > > Application.as file is present in Apache > > > > Royale SDK repo and has been > emulated. > > But > > > when we run the application, No > > > > visual output is shown in index.html > > (i.e > > > output file) > > > > > > > > Spark Application extends > > > SkinnableContainer in Flex SDK > > > > default.css for SkinnableContainer > is: > > > > SkinnableContainer > > > > { > > > > skinClass: > > > > > > > ClassReference("spark.skins.spark.SkinnableContainerSkin"); > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > In Flex mx:Application > extends > > > LayoutContainer extends Container > > > > in Flex SDK default.css for Container > > is > > > > > > > > Container > > > > { > > > > borderSkin: > > > > > > > ClassReference("mx.skins.spark.ContainerBorderSkin"); > > > > borderStyle: > > "none"; > > > > cornerRadius: 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > You have added in MXRoyale > > > default.css > > > > > > > > Container > > > > { > > > > IBeadView: > > > > > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.ContainerView"); > > > > IBeadLayout: > > > > > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.layouts.BasicLayout"); > > > > IViewport: > > > > > > > > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.ScrollingViewport"); > > > > > IViewportModel: > > > > > > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.models.ViewportModel"); > > > > } > > > > > > > > And mx:Application shows > > output. > > > > > > > > For Example : > > > > > > > > [1] Nothing in Output > > > > <s:Application xmlns:fx=" > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519989677&sdata=aLx6DM3z8z7ukjt%2F4AHz03OwIEb1rs73jQTQVgdRLBw%3D&reserved=0 > > > " > > > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:s="library:// > > > ns.apache.org/royale/spark" > > > > > > > > xmlns:mx="library:// > > ns.apache.org/royale/mx" > > > height = "100%" width = > > > > "100%" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <s:Button x="30" y="30" > > > > id="searchBtn" label="Search"/> > > > > > > > > </s:Application> > > > > > > > > [2] It shows Button in output > > file > > > > <mx:Application xmlns:fx=" > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519989677&sdata=aLx6DM3z8z7ukjt%2F4AHz03OwIEb1rs73jQTQVgdRLBw%3D&reserved=0 > > > " > > > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:s="library:// > > > ns.apache.org/royale/spark" > > > > > > > > xmlns:mx="library:// > > ns.apache.org/royale/mx" > > > height = "100%" width = > > > > "100%" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <s:Button x="30" y="30" > > > > id="searchBtn" label="Search"/> > > > > > > > > </mx:Application> > > > > > > > > How can I get Spark > Application > > > working as MX Application ? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alina > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > > > [email protected]] > > > > Sent: Monday, October 22, > 2018 > > 10:04 > > > PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An > > Emulation > > > Component To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > Again, I cannot help you as > > > efficiently if you do not provide > > > > important details. > > > > > > > > You are showing some part of > > the > > > console for building the > > > > application. But did the compiler > > hang, or > > > did it think it finished? What > > > > does your build.xml look like? What > > was the > > > full console output? I would > > > > want to see what command you typed > and > > all > > > output up to and including the > > > > command prompt after it finished. > As I > > > mentioned in prior emails, use > > > > paste.apache.org if necessary for > > large > > > quantities of console output. > > > > > > > > From the one line you pasted > > below, > > > it implied the build did not > > > > finish, yet you are saying that you > > tried to > > > run it and nothing showed up. > > > > Why would you try to run it if the > > build did > > > not finish? If the build did > > > > finish, did you get the expected > output > > > files? If the build did not > > > > finish, try stripping down what is in > > the > > > Module until it works, or compare > > > > the build.xml settings against > > > examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules. > > > > > > > > There are so many ways things > > can go > > > wrong, especially when > > > > developing new code. You must learn > > how to > > > work efficiently in these > > > > conditions. > > > > > > > > Another technique is to > compare > > > working against non-working. > > > > Examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules > > is able > > > to compile and load modules. > > > > You can set breakpoints in the > > > tourdeflexmodules code and follow how it > > > > works and set breakpoints in similar > > places > > > in your code and follow how it > > > > works and compares. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/22/18, 1:12 AM, "Alina > > Kazi" < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > This time I told you > about > > > folders hierarchy its same as > > > > examples/royale/ModuleExample. > > > > js:UIModuleLoader is > > replaced > > > with mx:ModuleLoader url > > > > property is added in ModuleLoader and > > extra > > > properties are removed, > > > > js:UIModule is replaced with > mx:Module > > > > js:Application is > replaced > > with > > > mx:Application > > > > namespace is replaced > with > > mx > > > namespace > > > > > > > > Console output stopped at > > : > > > > [mxmlc] 109142 bytes > > written to > > > > > > > > > > D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\royale\ModuleExample\Module\bin-debug\Module.swf > > > > in 3.220 seconds > > > > > > > > How else I can explain it > > in a > > > better way. > > > > Simply I just want same > > working > > > like > > > > examples/royale/ModuleExample with Mx > > > Controls. > > > > I am not using > TitleWindow > > in my > > > current example. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original > Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > > > [email protected]] > > > > Sent: Monday, October 22, > > 2018 > > > 12:40 PM > > > > To: > [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An > > > Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > Again, half a world > away, I > > > cannot know what your folder > > > > structure and build files look like, > > or what > > > you tried or didn't try. And > > > > now, I have to stop working and we > > missed an > > > opportunity to help you > > > > because the important information was > > not > > > provided in your earlier email. > > > > I wrote some techniques in this > email: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread.html%2Fe6f3aa4010dca8c9bdbe2828a89295039d05d23806a5fe03ae18dbe4%40%253Cdev.royale.apache.org%253E&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519989677&sdata=mELpQYlfbuQ5T8xdv0ELfGZP9ZOCopXir8GtAHnXMc8%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > In your next email, I > > expect you > > > see evidence that you have > > > > understood and tried the techniques > in > > the > > > email I linked. You will be > > > > expected to provide console output or > > > information about the tree of > > > > elements. And this might be a good > > > opportunity for you to try the debugger > > > > and set breakpoints in various > > places. Even > > > if you don't actually solve > > > > the problem you are facing, you are > > going to > > > have to become an expert in > > > > debugging JavaScript output from the > > Royale > > > Compiler. > > > > > > > > Please reserve the time > to > > write > > > a really good email with the > > > > important information and questions. > > It > > > will save all of us time. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/21/18, 11:39 PM, > > "Alex > > > Harui" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > The key piece for > > modules is > > > getting the output in the > > > > right place. Flex/Flash has some > > > interesting rules around how URLs got > > > > loaded. I haven't found a practical > > way to > > > replicate that in the Browser, > > > > so for now, it is up to you to put > the > > > output where you are telling > > > > ModuleLoader to load it. > > > > > > > > If you look at the > Ant > > > build.xml for royale/ModuleExample, > > > > the Module/build.xml assumes the > > MainApp has > > > been built first and copies > > > > its output files into the MainApp's > > output > > > folders. > > > > > > > > If you look at the > > build.xml > > > for > > > > mxroyale/touredeflexexamples, it uses > > the > > > -module-output compiler option to > > > > redirect the output. > > > > > > > > If you look in the > > Browser > > > console, I expect you will see > > > > errors that it couldn’t find a > > particular JS > > > file for the module. Pay > > > > attention to the folders and adjust > > your > > > build script to place the output > > > > in the right place (or adjust where > > you tell > > > ModuleLoader to find the > > > > module. > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/21/18, 11:22 > PM, > > > "Alina Kazi" <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > Created an > example > > > contains two files : > > > > 1. Module.mxml > > > > <mx:Module > > xmlns:fx=" > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519989677&sdata=aLx6DM3z8z7ukjt%2F4AHz03OwIEb1rs73jQTQVgdRLBw%3D&reserved=0 > > > > " > > > > > > > xmlns:mx="library:// > > > > ns.apache.org/royale/mx"> > > > > > > > > <mx:Label > > text="This > > > Label is in the module" /> > > > > <mx:TextInput > > > id="ti" text="This TextInput is also > > > > in the module" /> > > > > </mx:Module> > > > > > > > > 2. MainApp.mxml > > > > <mx:Application > > > xmlns:fx=" > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519989677&sdata=aLx6DM3z8z7ukjt%2F4AHz03OwIEb1rs73jQTQVgdRLBw%3D&reserved=0 > > > > " > > > > > > > xmlns:mx="library:// > > > > ns.apache.org/royale/mx" > > > > > > > > > <mx:Button > > > label="Btn in Application" /> > > > > > > > > > > <mx:ModuleLoader id > > > = "ml1" x="30" y="30" url = > > > > "Module.swf" /> > > > > > > > > </mx:Application> > > > > > > > > No visual output > > shown . > > > I want it to work like > > > > examples\royale\ModuleExample > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in > Advance , > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > -----Original > > > Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui > > [mailto: > > > [email protected]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, > > October > > > 16, 2018 9:33 PM > > > > To: > > > [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: > > Getting An > > > Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > I think there is > a > > > misunderstanding somewhere. > > > > > > > > How has your > > company > > > built the Flex app over the past > > > > years? Is it all from an IDE or do > > you have > > > some sort of script or build > > > > tool? > > > > > > > > Whatever you are > > using > > > to build the Flex app should be > > > > translated to the Ant script. What > is > > > currently in the Ant script you > > > > copied from tourdeflexmodules is > custom > > > designed for tourdeflexmodules. It > > > > presumes lots of little applications > > that > > > don't use custom libraries. > > > > > > > > The mxmlc task in > > Ant is > > > just like running mxml from > > > > the command line or having an > > Application > > > project in an IDE. > > > > The compc task in > > Ant is > > > just like running compc from > > > > the command line or having a Library > > project > > > in an IDE. > > > > > > > > You can see from > > the > > > build.xml files in the > > > > royale-asjs repo that we build SWCs > by > > > having a build.xml in each library > > > > folder and calling them from a > > build.xml in > > > a parent folder. You might > > > > find that pattern useful. > > > > > > > > You will need to > > > understand the -source-path and > > > > -library-path and > > -external-library-path and > > > other compiler options that > > > > were used to build the Flex app and > > copy > > > probably all of those options into > > > > the right place in the Ant scripts. > > > > > > > > It would be > > uncommon to > > > compile a file called shmUtil > > > > with mxmlc. shmUtil sounds like a > > file in a > > > library, not a standalone > > > > application. I'll bet it comes from > a > > > library that should be compiled with > > > > compc along with a lot of other > files. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are having > > > trouble with Ant, also try the > > > > command-line, then others may be able > > to > > > help you see the differences > > > > between your Ant script and what > > worked on > > > the command-line. If you use an > > > > IDE to build the Flex app, you will > > need to > > > find out all of the compiler > > > > options the IDE sets up for you. I > > think > > > others can help you with that as > > > > well. > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/16/18, 2:17 > > AM, > > > "Alina Kazi" < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > Created a > > mxmlc task > > > directly in build.xml still > > > > an error is occured : > > > > Added to > > Build.xml : > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FwBDm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519989677&sdata=IA51Iw4lXrUmzbPzgyj8Vg0lSOEmLdsk%2FO4obpAy0y0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > Error : > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOXFT&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519989677&sdata=TC%2FgylzJAdLNrVXlcaoEv2QzoUXV4a4WmTC6mKR4ToY%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original > > > Message----- > > > > From: Alex > > Harui > > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > > Sent: > Tuesday, > > > October 16, 2018 11:46 AM > > > > To: > > > [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: > > Getting > > > An Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > The example > in > > > > examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest > > is > > > working and accesses the server > > > > that is in examples/amf/ > > SampleAmfWebApp. > > > Theoretically, your old > > > > mx:RemoteObject code should work > > untouched. > > > Try it without touching it and > > > > tell us what kinds of errors you are > > > getting. If you are getting runtime > > > > errors, see how the > > RemoteObjectAMFTest uses > > > "casting" to be explicit about > > > > the types of the RemoteObject > > expressions. > > > You'll see "as Operation" to > > > > indicate that an mx:method in an > > > mx:RemoteObject is an Operation. > > > > > > > > The > > compile-mxml > > > macro is in the build.xml file. > > > > It has certain expectations of the > > structure > > > of the source files. Your > > > > source files are likely have a > > different > > > folder structure. You will need > > > > to add source-paths and other > compiler > > > options to the macro, or stop using > > > > the macro and call the mxmlc ant task > > > directly. That is up to you. This > > > > is a good opportunity to get to know > > Ant and > > > the compiler better. > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/15/18, > > 11:07 > > > PM, "Alina Kazi" < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex & > > Carlos, > > > > I haven't > > tested > > > my ported Application with > > > > server side functionality yet. > > > > Can you > > please > > > share an Example that I can > > > > follow to get my mx:RemoteObject > > working as > > > FLEX. > > > > > > > > I have > > another > > > question > > > > > > > > I am > > working on > > > my Application and it has two > > > > different directories like > > > com->shm->modules->AP and > > > > com->shm->modules->components and I > > want to > > > compile a file inside > > > > com->shm->modules->AP->abc.mxml and > it > > uses > > > a file inside > > > > > > com->shm->modules->components->xyz.mxml. > > > > I have > > added > > > <compile-mxml > > > > folder="/com/shm/modules/AP/" > example=" > > > abc"/> to build.xml. > > > > unable > to > > > access xyz inside abc. > > > > > > > > Like > > > > > > > > > > D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\mxroyale\tourdeflexmodules\src\spark\components\ > > > > VideoPlayerExample.mxml is using > > > VideoPlayer.mxml in my case > > > > VideoPlayer.mxml is not is the same > > > directory. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alina > Kazi > > > > > > > > > > -----Original > > > Message----- > > > > From: > > Carlos > > > Rovira [mailto: > > > > [email protected]] > > > > Sent: > > Tuesday, > > > October 16, 2018 12:26 AM > > > > To: > > > [email protected] > > > > Subject: > > Re: > > > Getting An Emulation Component To > > > > Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > yes, I > > added > > > those classes when worked trying > > > > to make it work in net RO, but I > found > > a > > > wall at that time. I think DSK > > > > objects had a different code when > > > deserialized, and our AMF implementation > > > > was not able to handle that. > > > > I was not > > able > > > to know how to deal with that > > > > so I had to abandon. At least I could > > pass > > > that disabling small messages on > > > > BlazeDS. > > > > > > > > I don't > > think > > > Small Messages are very > > > > important, don't know how "small" > > > > will be, > > so I > > > think we can go to other things > > > > more important. If I found some > > problem as I > > > start to grow my application > > > > that could be related to small > > messages I'll > > > report. Hope not find any issue > > > > > > > > The only > > > drawback could be people coming that > > > > must know they need to disable small > > > messages on their BlazeDS. > > > > > > > > I think > it > > will > > > be more important later since > > > > IExternalizable in itself seems an > > important > > > addition. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El lun., > > 15 oct. > > > 2018 a las 20:21, Alex Harui > > > > (<[email protected]>) > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > The > > classes > > > that represent DSK, DSA and DSC > > > > are in the MXRoyale and > > > > > Network > > > projects, but it looks like they > > > > implement IExternalizable. I > > > > > don't > > see any > > > evidence that the JS AMF > > > > support currently handles > > > > > > > > IExternalizable. > > > > > > > > > > I'm not > > clear > > > on how important SmallMessages > > > > and IExternalizable are. > > > > > If it > > isn't > > > that important, there are plenty > > > > of other things to work > > > > > on. If > > it is > > > important, do we have a test > > > > case that uses IExternalizable? > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > On > > 10/15/18, > > > 10:55 AM, "Carlos Rovira" < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, > > > > > > > > > > I > > tried > > > today (with code > > > > pre-callProperty, that I think does > > not make > > > > > > > difference > > > for this). > > > > > > > There's > > > small message support in RPC > > > > classes, but when I looked at that > > > > > > code > > when > > > I investigate it, I think must > > > > be accompanied from some AMF > > > > > > > > serialization/deserialization support. I > > > > couldn't find any resources on > > > > > > this > > in > > > the internet about how to handle > > > > DSK, DSA or DSC. Maybe > > > > > you can > > ask > > > > > > > internally > > > in Adobe how to deal with > > > > that. My guess is that this > > > > > was > added > > > > > to > > Flash > > > plugin AMF serialization > > > > capabilities. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El > > lun., > > > 15 oct. 2018 a las 19:03, Alex > > > > Harui > > > > > > > > (<[email protected]>) > > > > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Carlos, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have you > > > verified that small messages > > > > do not work with the MX > > > > > > > > > RemoteObject? I thought I saw Small > > > > Message support when I was > > > > > > migrating > > > > > > > > the code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > On > > > 10/15/18, 10:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira" > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > Alina, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just > > > for if you don't know. If you > > > > use BlazeDS Java server, > > > > > > remember > > > > > > > to > > set > > > > > > > > up > > > small messages to false, or you > > > > RemoteObjects will not work. > > > > > To get > > > > > > > > > small messages we'll need to > > > > upgrade AMF > > > > > > > > serialization-deserialization > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > know > > > how to handle DSK, DSA, and > > > > DSC RemoteClass aliases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El > > > lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 18:39, > > > > Alex Harui > > > > > > > > > (<[email protected]>) > > > > > > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > Alina, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good to know. You (and anybody > > > > working with the emulation > > > > > > > > > components) are > > > > > > > > > > > > expected to keep track of the > > > > commits to the royale-compiler > > > > > as well > > > > > > > as > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > royale-asjs repos and stay > > > > updated. We are still finding bugs > > > > > in the > > > > > > > > > > > > transpiling that may affect you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On > > > 10/15/18, 2:17 AM, "Alina > > > > Kazi" <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot it worked for > > > > me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alina kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > > > > [email protected]] > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 15, > > > > 2018 2:07 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An > > > > Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you sure you are using > > > > the latest compiler? Try > > > > > > compiling > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest. It > > > compiles without > > > > > errors > > > > > > > > for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have to stop for tonight. > > > > Hopefully others will help > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/15/18, 1:37 AM, "Alina > > > > Kazi" <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > We are using MX Remote > > > > Object in almost our every > > > > > Class > > like > > > > > > > > this: > > > > > > > > > > > > <mx:RemoteObject > > > > > > > > > > > > > channelSet="{parentApplication.amfChannelSet}" > > > > > > > > > > > > id="DataProviderService" > > > > showBusyCursor="true" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > destination="shmBasic" > > > > fault="handleFault(event);" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > result="handleResult(event);" /> > > > > > > > > > > > > We get error ASBlocker > > > > subsystem. > > > > > > > > > > > > When we comment > > > > RemoteObject we need to comment > methods > > > > > > > > those are > > > > > > > > > > > > using it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with that if I > > > > will delete some code for > > > > > > > compilation > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > will face other issues at later > > > > stage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can I replace > > > > mx:remoteObject with : > > > > > > > > > > > > <s:RemoteObject id="ro" > > > > endpoint=" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jamesward.com%2Fcensus2-tests%2Fmessagebroker%2Famf&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519989677&sdata=j5dX3LsBCuv%2FDWs9j3VsGx%2BHrV54D9xFxkPwuLZLqFg%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > " > > > > > > > > > > > > destination="census"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > > > > > > > > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original > > > > Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > > > > [email protected]] > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October > > > > 15, 2018 1:16 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > To: > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An > > > > Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I recommend just running > > > > the compiled application and > > > > > fixing > > > > > > > > > > > > problems as you run into them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you start copying > > > > code and deleting other code, you > > > > > cannot > > > > > > > > > > > > guarantee that the results will > > > > run. I'm not even sure > > > > > > > TitleWindow > > > > > > > is > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > valid child control of an > > > > Application. Usually it is a popup > > > > > dialog. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you run the > > > > application, you will probably find > > > > > > > > > exceptions in > > > > > > > > > > > > the console. Set a breakpoint, > > > > see if you can figure out why > > > > > it is > > > > > > > > > > > > generating an exception. Change > > > > the code as needed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you aren’t getting > > > > exceptions, then look at the > > > > > element > > > > > > > > tree. > > > > > > > > > > > > Either all of the expected > > > > elements have been created or not. > > > > > If > > > > > > > > not, then > > > > > > > > > > > > look at the innermost element to > > > > see what it is. In the > > > > > > > properties > > > > > > > > for the > > > > > > > > > > > > element is a royale_wrapper > > > > property that points to the > > > > > > > transpiled > > > > > > > AS3 > > > > > > > > > > > > class. That can help you know > > > > what class didn't create its > > > > > > children. > > > > > > > > > > > > Check the _beads array of that > > > > class to see if it created its > > > > > beads > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > not. If not, check the CSS for > > > > that element, or debug into > > > > > its > code. > > > > > > > > > > > > Usually, addedToParent is where > > > > the view bead is added. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the elements have > > > > been created, check the sizes. > > > > > Often > > > > > > > > some of > > > > > > > > > > > > them will have width or height = > > > > 0. Try to figure why it is > > > > > getting > > > > > > a > > bad > > > > > > > > > > > > size. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you take this > > > > approach, then if you get stuck you > > > > > can ask > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > much more specific question and > > > > we can give you more specific > > > > > > > > answers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, our days > > > > only overlap by a few hours, > > > > > but I > > > > > > > > hope > > > > > > > > > > > > other committers can help as > > > > well. It is in their best > > > > > > interest > > to > > > > > > > > improve > > > > > > > > > > > > their help and debugging skills. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/15/18, 12:59 AM, > > > > "Alina Kazi" < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > As our whole > > > > application is compiled successfully > > > > > without > > > > > > > > > > > > error as a part of SparkRoyale > > > > Library. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, We have created > > > > a project like > > > > > > > > tourdeflexmodules to > > > > > > > > > > > > compile and visually see the > > > > application output. > > > > > > > > > > > > Initially started > > > > with the basic(small) file of our > > > > > > > > > > > > application that is used by most > > > > of the files of our > > > > > > > Application. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have a file in > > > > our application "Picklist.mxml" > > > > > > > > > > > > It was actually like > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FRVtj&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519999686&sdata=XxwWELrbgLLMcs7K3dgaKB%2Bl6MqcD2yerGu%2B0c0855M%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want to see it > > > > visually as all our mx and spark > > > > > > > > controls > > > > > > > > > > > > are already added in Apache > > > > Royale. > > > > > > > > > > > > Deleted whole code > > > > accept visual controls from src > > > > > file : > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FH4Sm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519999686&sdata=iWsFY2fECVOJqYLpWdBN9oia6GH17iu2XKG8P7y%2FXDQ%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nothing shows inside > > > > spark BorderContainer & > > > > > > > TitleWindow. > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FEpS8&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519999686&sdata=3zrGhcHIZRJnsP95gOBrJp1FCMYdw8E3ywz81AHq6mU%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > How can we see all > > > > visual controls as they were in > > > > > Flex > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > this particular file. > > > > > > > > > > > > Even spark > > > > BorderContainer default.css is copied > > > > > from > > > > > > > > Flex > > > > > > > > > > > > ->Royale. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original > > > > Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Alex Harui > > > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, > > > > October 15, 2018 11:15 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > To: > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Getting > > > > An Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Different APIs will > > > > have different solutions. > > > > > Pick an > > > > > > > > API you > > > > > > > > > > > > want to have work and let's > > > > discuss how to make it work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/14/18, 10:48 > > > > PM, "Alina Kazi" < > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All mx and spark > > > > class methods those were left > > > > > empty > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > the compilation of Application. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also Module does > > > > not show anything on screen. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in > > > > Advance, > > > > > > > > > > > > Alina > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original > > > > Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Alex Harui > > > > [mailto: > > > > > > > > [email protected]] > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, > > > > October 11, 2018 12:32 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > To: > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: > > > > Getting An Emulation Component To > > > > > Run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which components > > > > or properties are you trying > > > > > to get > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > run? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/10/18, > > > > 10:40 PM, "Alina Kazi" < > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What if CSS > > > > for a component is not written > > > > > in > > > > > > > > Basic / > > > > > > > > > > > > Express defaults.css? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And We need > > > > it in MXRoyale / SparkRoyale > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Alex > > > > Harui [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: > > > > Monday, October 08, 2018 8:40 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > To: Alina > > > > Kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: > > > > Getting An Emulation > > > > > > > Component To > > > > > > > Run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please ask > > > > these questions on dev@ as > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CSS with > > > > ClassReference is a way to use > > > > > > > > > Composition to > > > > > > > > > > > > customize components. Copying > > > > code is usually a bad practice > > > > > as it > > > > > > > > > > > > creates maintenance issues. So, > > > > in general, the preference > > > > > should > > > > > > > be > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > use CSS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Alina > > > > Kazi <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: > > > > Monday, October 8, 2018 at 2:02 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > To: Alex > > > > Harui <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: > > > > Getting An Emulation Component To > > > > > Run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We want to > > > > know how can we identify which > > > > > is the > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > > > > stub? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Example: > > > > selected property written > > > > > > > > > differently in > > > > > > > > > > > > CheckBox, RadioButton and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want > > > > selected property for Button. How > > > > > can we > > > > > > > > > > > > identify and pick the right code > > > > for Button? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > copying the little bits of code > > > > > from > the > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic or Express version into > > > > the right stub in the Emulation > > > > > > > > Component > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. > > > > copying the CSS from Basic or > > > > > Express > > > > > > > > > > > > defaults.css into the MXRoyale > > > > or SparkRoyale defaults.css > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in > > > > Advance, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519999686&sdata=4qJIRQnz6%2BZ%2BKpf%2F2wpYQkG8vXHNH7pKwHUgM0ZJq2w%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Carlos > > > Rovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout. > > > > > > > > me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui% > > > > 40adobe.com%7C04eb29f37fce > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40d3df9908d632c77330%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6367 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 52229546474497&sdata=7S2M%2BRlyCsWd2pShdvTsjfyJp9xyZ5bdaAc3zZQrilU > > > > > > > > %3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Carlos > > Rovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519999686&sdata=4qJIRQnz6%2BZ%2BKpf%2F2wpYQkG8vXHNH7pKwHUgM0ZJq2w%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > Patreon: * > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519999686&sdata=Uku%2B9CX2dZ0dg1hDOwJACM8TUZpaW%2BCegvpICx44%2FLc%3D&reserved=0 > > > < > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519999686&sdata=Uku%2B9CX2dZ0dg1hDOwJACM8TUZpaW%2BCegvpICx44%2FLc%3D&reserved=0 > > > >* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadc6521cadd74641e1f308d64934cfc5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776888519999686&sdata=4qJIRQnz6%2BZ%2BKpf%2F2wpYQkG8vXHNH7pKwHUgM0ZJq2w%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
