Should be here:

http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/configureTools/

HTH,
-Alex

From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "dev@royale.apache.org" <dev@royale.apache.org>
Date: Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 9:37 PM
To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI

I'm a bit stumped here.  The royale-compiler is failing with this error:


BUILD FAILED

c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\jenkins.xml:55: Execute failed: 
java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "git" (in directory 
"c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler"): CreateProcess error=2, The system 
cannot find the file specified

  at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(Unknown Source)


It is from this part of the jenkins.xml:


    <target name="closure-lib-download" description="Copies Closure Library 
from GitHub">
        <echo message="Be patient. This takes a few minutes..." />
        <exec executable="git" failifexecutionfails="true">
            <arg value="clone" />
            <arg 
value="https://github.com/google/closure-library<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-library&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0dd5709b5c23458c5f0508d7e4e47f47%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229542364320116&sdata=yH8RnSomTWYMU5qKf%2FnQhztdjHhVRIb%2BdtmaU6cIUzQ%3D&reserved=0>"
 />
            <arg value="${closure.root}" />
        </exec>
        <echo>Cloned fresh copy of Google Closure Library</echo>
    </target>

I am not sure how this executable call works without the full path.

I checked the env variables, I do have both the git/bin and git/cmd directory 
in the PATH:

[cid:ii_k97zkk9o0]

What am I missing?

Thanks,
Om

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:54 PM OmPrakash Muppirala 
<bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Update - I have successfully attached my VM as a slave agent of our Jenkins 
instance.
I am going to pull the job - /royale-asjs_jsonly and tie it to my agent so I 
can test it.

It will fail for a sometime while I go set up my VM with all the dependencies.

Once we have the job successfully building on my VM, we can figure out how to 
divide the load between the master and agent.

Thanks,
Om

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 8:59 AM OmPrakash Muppirala 
<bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
We could achieve the same by creating a new agent (separate vm) and attaching 
it as a slave to the current Jenkins server.

Then we can use labels/tags to tie release jobs to one agent and non release 
jobs to another agent.

That way we can maintain everything in one UI, one login while achieving the 
concurrent building capabilities we want.

Jenkins is built for this kind of stuff and I think it would be best we 
followed this practice.

Thanks,
Om
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 8:18 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
Om, I thought you were going to get the image from my VM and run it on another 
VM.  Then we'd remove all non-release jobs from your VM and all of the release 
jobs from my VM.  That won't solve the problem of how long it takes for a 
commit to be built and tested, but will allow the RM to get a release out 
without getting stuck behind the commit jobs.  Is that currently the plan?

-Alex

On 4/18/20, 12:43 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" 
<bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Makes sense to me.  I will set parallel executors back to 1.

    And start working on a new Jenkins instance.

    Thanks,
    Om


    On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 12:28 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:

    > Are you saying that Java, Ant and Maven do not know how to distribute work
    > to different cores?
    >
    > To repeat my main concern:  our Jenkins jobs often use shared resources.
    > If you want to take the time to fix that, feel free, but I do not know how
    > you are going to keep two jobs from both trying to launch Flash Player
    > Debugger at the same time and open the same socket to communicate with it,
    > or try to parse the flashlog.txt that they have both written to.
    >
    > The royale-asjs job will use the royale-compiler workspace to get the
    > compiler.  If the compiler is building, the jars are not there and the
    > royale-asjs build fails.
    >
    > There is also only so much memory and some of our jobs use all of it and
    > I'm not sure if jobs slowed down due to paging memory and writing/reading
    > from disk, even if it is an SSD.
    >
    > I'm done for tonight, but that's what I was seeing last time I tried to
    > have both master and an agent running jobs in parallel.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > -Alex
    >
    > On 4/17/20, 11:52 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" 
<bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
    >
    >     A typical setup would be to have 0 executors on master and at least n
    >     number of executors on each agent, where n = number of cpu cores.
    >     I see that the current VM has 2 cores.  So, I started with setting the
    > num
    >     executors on the current agent to 2.
    >
    >     This should improve things quite a bit.  If this doesn't work, I will
    >     create a new VM and make it the slave agent of the current Jenkins
    > master.
    >
    >
    >     Thanks,
    >     Om
    >
    >     On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:31 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     wrote:
    >
    >     > On your VM or mine?  I don't think mine can handle it.  I used to
    > run jobs
    >     > of master and agent and we got lots of failures and jobs took
    > forever.  If
    >     > two jobs are trying to run tests with the shared Flash Player
    > Debugger, for
    >     > example, you won't get consistent results.
    >     >
    >     > -Alex
    >     >
    >     > On 4/17/20, 11:23 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" 
<bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>>
    > wrote:
    >     >
    >     >     I just realized that we have only one Agent (node) listed under
    >     > Jenkins.  I
    >     >     am going to add at least one more node to start with.
    >     >
    >     >     Thanks,
    >     >     Om
    >     >
    >     >     On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:58 AM Alex Harui
    > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     > wrote:
    >     >
    >     >     > I think I followed the instructions and enabled SSH.
    >     >     >
    >     >     > On 4/16/20, 9:37 AM, "Yishay Weiss" 
<yishayj...@hotmail.com<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>>
    > wrote:
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     I haven’t gotten it to work. Could be ssh needs to be
    > enabled on
    >     > the
    >     >     > VM [1]. This is nice to have but not essential. So Alex, let
    > me know
    >     > if you
    >     >     > want to try that, otherwise I’ll suspend my efforts on this.
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     [1]
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Ftechinpieces%2Fpractical-azure-how-to-enable-ssh-on-azure-vm-84d8fba8103e&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C15fe635dba674d69308108d7e36c2ea2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227926092990578&amp;sdata=%2FdPPdqLaeWZYyshv14%2BhhL0ffSznS%2BAUOGQ3xNnwido%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Ftechinpieces%2Fpractical-azure-how-to-enable-ssh-on-azure-vm-84d8fba8103e&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0dd5709b5c23458c5f0508d7e4e47f47%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229542364330112&sdata=7px%2Fi%2FK64cMzUmtgJXgLikG3iBXXpmp1LT6YZmZk%2FpU%3D&reserved=0>
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     From: Yishay 
Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>>
    >     >     >     Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 5:09 PM
    >     >     >     To: 
dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>>
    >     >     >     Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     I’d like to try and install an ssh server. Can anyone
    > think of a
    >     >     > reason not to do that? I’m asking in terms of security, and if
    > there
    >     > might
    >     >     > be a problem because it’s a VM.
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     Thanks.
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     From: Yishay 
Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>>
    >     >     >     Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 10:02 AM
    >     >     >     To: 
dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>>
    >     >     >     Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     Related, as most (all?) of the instructions don’t require
    >     > anything but
    >     >     > a shell wouldn’t it be easier and faster to access the machine
    > with
    >     > ssh
    >     >     > [1], rather than using remote desktop?
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     [1]
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-server%2Fadministration%2Fopenssh%2Fopenssh_install_firstuse&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C15fe635dba674d69308108d7e36c2ea2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227926092990578&amp;sdata=pKNVfpAa0zGTTCz2jnsF9Uley6b%2BY%2Bg1ZlSWJ0%2FiYcY%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-server%2Fadministration%2Fopenssh%2Fopenssh_install_firstuse&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0dd5709b5c23458c5f0508d7e4e47f47%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229542364340114&sdata=wefrwBy0B5PnAklSrSYqF5VzRtCXYOmV70vGipgK%2B%2F4%3D&reserved=0>
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     From: Yishay 
Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>>
    >     >     >     Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 9:55 AM
    >     >     >     To: 
dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>>
    >     >     >     Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     Can’t you do that with remote desktop?
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     ________________________________
    >     >     >     From: OmPrakash Muppirala 
<bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>>
    >     >     >     Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 9:51:25 AM
    >     >     >     To: Apache Royale Development 
<dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>>
    >     >     >     Subject: Re: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     Alex,
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     I believe this is your personal Azure subscription right?
    > Any
    >     > chance
    >     >     > I can
    >     >     >     get access to it so I can try to copy the image out the
    > machine
    >     > and
    >     >     >     redeploy it somewhere else?
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     Thanks,
    >     >     >     Om
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 6:18 PM OmPrakash Muppirala <
    >     >     > bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>>
    >     >     >     wrote:
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     > I can help set this up on Azure.  Give me some time to
    > work
    >     > out the
    >     >     >     > details?
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     > Thanks,
    >     >     >     > Om
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020, 11:49 AM Harbs <
    > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
    >     > wrote:
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >> OK. Good to know.
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >> > On Apr 12, 2020, at 9:45 PM, Alex Harui
    >     > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
    >     >     > >
    >     >     >     >> wrote:
    >     >     >     >> >
    >     >     >     >> > FWIW, I just looked and the longest job in the 
release
    >     > steps so
    >     >     > far is
    >     >     >     >> 8 minutes.  Most are under 2 minutes.  There might be
    > jobs
    >     > later
    >     >     > that take
    >     >     >     >> longer that we haven't run yet.  IMO, the issue isn't
    > speed
    >     > of the
    >     >     > machine,
    >     >     >     >> it is just that we are sharing the machine with longer
    > jobs
    >     > (1 hour
    >     >     > for
    >     >     >     >> TourDeFlexMigration).  And again, the machine will be
    > idle for
    >     >     > stretches of
    >     >     >     >> time while the RM verifies artifacts after each step.
    >     >     >     >> >
    >     >     >     >> > -Alex
    >     >     >     >> >
    >     >     >     >> > On 4/12/20, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" 
<harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>
    >     > <mailto:
    >     >     >     >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>> 
wrote:
    >     >     >     >> >
    >     >     >     >> >    Fair enough.
    >     >     >     >> >
    >     >     >     >> >    I expect builds to be somewhere between 10 and 20
    > times
    >     > faster
    >     >     > on a
    >     >     >     >> powerful machine.
    >     >     >     >> >
    >     >     >     >> >    Yeah. It’s probably going to be a bit of work
    > changing
    >     > the
    >     >     > server,
    >     >     >     >> but probably worth it in the long run.
    >     >     >     >> >
    >     >     >     >> >    I think I’ll try this when I do the next release
    > unless
    >     > Yishay
    >     >     > wants
    >     >     >     >> to work with me on this for this release — but I’m not
    > going
    >     > to be
    >     >     > able to
    >     >     >     >> help until after Passover (i.e. next week).
    >     >     >     >> >
    >     >     >     >> >    Thanks,
    >     >     >     >> >    Harbs
    >     >     >     >> >
    >     >     >     >> >> On Apr 12, 2020, at 9:22 PM, Alex Harui
    >     > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
    >     >     > >
    >     >     >     >> wrote:
    >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >     >     >> >> The Azure portal says: Standard F2s_v2 (2 vcpus, 4
    > GiB
    >     > memory)
    >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >     >     >> >> I think I am reading changes to the build process in
    > your
    >     >     >     >> suggestions.  I do not really want to spend more of my
    > time
    >     > on this
    >     >     >     >> process.  But if you want to do the work, that's fine
    > with me.
    >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >     >     >> >> -Alex
    >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >     >     >> >> On 4/12/20, 10:57 AM, "Harbs" 
<harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>
    >     > <mailto:
    >     >     >     >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> 
<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>
    > <mailto:
    >     >     >     >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>>> 
wrote:
    >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >     >     >> >>   What kind of horsepower is included in the free
    > Azure
    >     > account?
    >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >     >     >> >>   The server I mentioned builds (considerably)
    > faster than
    >     > my own
    >     >     >     >> local machine. The ci server seems to build many times
    > slower.
    >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >     >     >> >>   One thing we can do to minimize running server 
time
    >     > would be to
    >     >     >     >> transfer the artifacts to storage instead of keeping
    > them on
    >     > the
    >     >     > server. On
    >     >     >     >> AWS, I’d probably use S3. Not sure what the similar
    > service on
    >     >     > Azure is
    >     >     >     >> called.
    >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >     >     >> >>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 8:26 PM, Alex Harui
    >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
    >     >     >     >> 
<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>>> wrote:
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>> OK, that's pretty much how I understand Azure as
    > well.
    >     > The key
    >     >     > thing
    >     >     >     >> is that "running" includes time where the CI server is
    > not
    >     > running
    >     >     > any
    >     >     >     >> Jenkins jobs.  The CI Server steps might take only a 
few
    >     > hours of
    >     >     > actual
    >     >     >     >> server time, but there is time where the RM is 
verifying
    >     > artifacts
    >     >     > locally
    >     >     >     >> so you'd be paying for that or the RM would have to 
keep
    >     > shutting
    >     >     > down and
    >     >     >     >> restarting.
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>> Seems like it would be cheaper/simpler to get the
    > free
    >     > MSDN
    >     >     > account
    >     >     >     >> and leave it running.
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>> -Alex
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>> On 4/12/20, 10:15 AM, "Harbs" <
    > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>
    >     > <mailto:
    >     >     >     >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>> 
wrote:
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>  My experience is with AWS.
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>  I assume Microsoft has similar offerings, but I
    > don’t
    >     > have
    >     >     >     >> experience with Azure.
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>  AWS has on-demand EC2 instances which you pay for
    > only
    >     > the
    >     >     > actual
    >     >     >     >> time that they are running.[1]
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>  Instances can be started and stopped via command
    > line
    >     > (or via
    >     >     > the
    >     >     >     >> web interface) as long as you have valid credentials to
    > do so.
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>  For example: an m5.4xlarge instance has 16 cores
    > and
    >     > costs
    >     >     > about
    >     >     >     >> $1.5 per hour. On a machine like that, a full build
    > would
    >     > probably
    >     >     > take
    >     >     >     >> less than 10 minutes. It’s probably possible to do a
    > full
    >     > release
    >     >     > with only
    >     >     >     >> a few hours of server time.
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>  Leaving a server like that running all the time
    > would get
    >     >     > expensive,
    >     >     >     >> but if it’s just spun up for releases, you’d get very
    > fast
    >     > builds
    >     >     > at a
    >     >     >     >> reasonable price.
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>  I’d be happy to pay $10-$50 (and possibly more) 
per
    >     > release to
    >     >     > make
    >     >     >     >> the release process painless for the RM.
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>  [1]
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C15fe635dba674d69308108d7e36c2ea2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227926092990578&amp;sdata=AlpLmsJYbBpN%2BLTXIwn2ESklg5aU04KGAfWe2vhJxyc%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0dd5709b5c23458c5f0508d7e4e47f47%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229542364340114&sdata=41K%2BATYi7LVVlRri0xuMXsyxGTcbKZ25kNwwkZvuBjE%3D&reserved=0>
    >     >     >     >> <
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C15fe635dba674d69308108d7e36c2ea2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227926092990578&amp;sdata=AlpLmsJYbBpN%2BLTXIwn2ESklg5aU04KGAfWe2vhJxyc%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0dd5709b5c23458c5f0508d7e4e47f47%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229542364350105&sdata=gZiMiKr%2BHVB2nZ%2B%2Fc5800BhJU0qZJdBKOci8VHBX4iM%3D&reserved=0>
    >     >     >     >> ><
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C15fe635dba674d69308108d7e36c2ea2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227926092990578&amp;sdata=AlpLmsJYbBpN%2BLTXIwn2ESklg5aU04KGAfWe2vhJxyc%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0dd5709b5c23458c5f0508d7e4e47f47%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229542364360099&sdata=FOiH4WuVekfyBUwXcJMTTV5BTli4R3XObAAR5aQy90Y%3D&reserved=0>
    >     >     >     >> <
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C15fe635dba674d69308108d7e36c2ea2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227926092990578&amp;sdata=AlpLmsJYbBpN%2BLTXIwn2ESklg5aU04KGAfWe2vhJxyc%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0dd5709b5c23458c5f0508d7e4e47f47%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229542364360099&sdata=FOiH4WuVekfyBUwXcJMTTV5BTli4R3XObAAR5aQy90Y%3D&reserved=0>
    >     >     >     >> >><
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C15fe635dba674d69308108d7e36c2ea2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227926092990578&amp;sdata=AlpLmsJYbBpN%2BLTXIwn2ESklg5aU04KGAfWe2vhJxyc%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0dd5709b5c23458c5f0508d7e4e47f47%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229542364370100&sdata=daWwHVoCUnh%2BFJluzPj1CFre8b1SdwTYvGAM1ag2EZc%3D&reserved=0>
    >     >     >     >> <
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C15fe635dba674d69308108d7e36c2ea2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227926093000574&amp;sdata=YZE52sCQqRXb6CAMtU4DW3RKXjg%2FffHhiGy5b0Yz2I0%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0dd5709b5c23458c5f0508d7e4e47f47%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229542364370100&sdata=daWwHVoCUnh%2BFJluzPj1CFre8b1SdwTYvGAM1ag2EZc%3D&reserved=0>
    >     >     >     >> ><
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C15fe635dba674d69308108d7e36c2ea2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227926093000574&amp;sdata=YZE52sCQqRXb6CAMtU4DW3RKXjg%2FffHhiGy5b0Yz2I0%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0dd5709b5c23458c5f0508d7e4e47f47%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229542364380093&sdata=FUO4FFIy4h6Y793ePdbcnEoR4sV%2FnjHfnIWX1M0tcyg%3D&reserved=0>
    >     >     >     >> <
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C15fe635dba674d69308108d7e36c2ea2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227926093000574&amp;sdata=YZE52sCQqRXb6CAMtU4DW3RKXjg%2FffHhiGy5b0Yz2I0%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0dd5709b5c23458c5f0508d7e4e47f47%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229542364390094&sdata=04q6yASC3OU6KPZ9ROXkDV0taI9D%2FG1EKoKcdPj7tAs%3D&reserved=0>
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 7:45 PM, Alex Harui
    >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
    >     >     >     >> wrote:
    >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>> I'm not very experienced with spinning up
    > servers.  The
    >     > CI
    >     >     > server we
    >     >     >     >> are using is effectively free, based on a generous
    > donation
    >     > from
    >     >     > Microsoft
    >     >     >     >> of MSDN accounts to ASF committers.  So I leave it up
    > 24/7,
    >     > and
    >     >     > share the
    >     >     >     >> RDP access on private@.  I think any other ASF
    > committer
    >     > could do
    >     >     > the
    >     >     >     >> same.  IIRC, if that server actually is stopped, I have
    > to
    >     > use my
    >     >     > personal
    >     >     >     >> (unshared) MSDN credentials to start it again.   AIUI,
    > if I
    >     >     > actually paid
    >     >     >     >> for the server, it would cost me to leave it running
    > even if
    >     > it
    >     >     > didn't run
    >     >     >     >> jobs between releases.
    >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>> Is that what you are basically saying?  I think it
    > might
    >     > be
    >     >     > best if
    >     >     >     >> another committer got a CI server going via the MS
    > donation
    >     > and
    >     >     > could leave
    >     >     >     >> it up 24/7.
    >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>> -Alex
    >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>> On 4/12/20, 9:28 AM, "Harbs" <
    > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
    >     > wrote:
    >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>> I’m willing to do this.
    >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>> Considering that the release will be run
    > infrequently, it
    >     >     > should be
    >     >     >     >> doable to have a relatively powerful server that could
    > be
    >     > spun up on
    >     >     >     >> demand. This is something I have setup for my own
    > releases.
    >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>> The only complication would be that each RM would
    > need
    >     > valid
    >     >     >     >> credentials to spin up the server.
    >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>> Harbs
    >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 7:10 PM, Alex Harui
    >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
    >     >     >     >> wrote:
    >     >     >     >> >>>>>
    >     >     >     >> >>>>> A better solution, IMO, is for someone else to
    > offer up
    >     > a CI
    >     >     > server
    >     >     >     >> only for release jobs.
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >
    >
    >

Reply via email to